Conceptual Processes Of The Phenomena Intuitive Intelligence - Article Example

 CONCEPTUAL PROCESSES OF THE PHENOMENA INTUITIVE INTELLIGENCE Nina Ivarsen How intuition and its effects are conceived within the cognitive physiological theories and what are the actual effects measured if any? How conceivable and exploitable is the intuitive effects in selection, determination, controlling, judgemental processes, and in relation to cognitive risk management? This study takes intuitively-based intelligence, in its broadest essence and transforms its understanding of assessment into intuitive effects, a process used to improve performance and risk value. In the business world, people will still remain unwilling in 2011, to acknowledge their use of intuition, fearing negative responses of approaching unseriousness (Agor1, 1986).  This study seeks to redefine intuition in a form, which is acceptable to the rationalistic school as an effect tool, being the intuitive effects of the phenomena intuitive intelligence. Scientifically, that human using their intuitive intelligence as an effect tool are less thought-of, where as human that uses intuitions in their decision-making or in strategic work are briefly documented and accepted, but also deeply rooted in bias against non-rational methods (Agor2, 1986 and Mintzberg3, 1976). Traditionally reported, people’s use of intuition ranges from inferential processes, performed under their own pre-existing memory database (Agor, 1986) used as predictive abilities (Eisenhardt4, 1989). However, it is adequate to believe that intuitive intelligence as a basic instinct has always been present and affected in cognitive processes as external stimulus, internal impression and personality characteristics. The categories selected as representative characteristics; external stimulus, internal impression and personality came from our pre study building on psychological, cognitive and philosophical theories. The essence of internal impression and external stimulus assumes that it is reasonable to believe that knowledge of the concepts that came from the human inside is considered of equal importance to knowledge of the concepts gained through outside sources. It is also of interest to this study to know, that humans’ inner impression and external stimulus motivates personalities, and has the capacity to make the individual able to develop complete unique personalities to perform thoughts and actions. The factual understanding of intuitive intelligence can be compared with the non technical sensation of feelings, it does exist and its effects can be felt. Few scientist has formally intellectualize intuitive intelligence, but Einsteinian’s described intuition as the seven-sense, a practical way to make tough decisions using inner wisdom, a correlation between self and brain ‘‘knowing something without knowing how you know it’’. Accepting the concept and the phenomena of intuitive intelligence; the challenge lies in the research questions, how is intuitive effects conceived within the cognitive theories, and what is the psychological effects of intuitive intelligence? A central part of this research is to provide the scientific acceptance for the conceptuality of intuitive effect. This research examines the broader concept of intuitive intelligence and the cognitive psychological constructs of intuitive effect by means of literature review and a qualitative study of measures within an international randomised group, selected from the private and public sector. In the literature review, the nature and experience of the use of intuitive skills and abilities will be examined and discussed. Research questions regarding the relationship between intuitive effect and related effect methods are discussed. Finally, the literature review will explore rational and non-logical processing styles for intuitive intelligence and the construct of intuitive effects and the academicism positioning which call for an intuitive approach in cognitive risk management. Through qualitative research, we found three main methods of collected data, document analysis, observation and interview5. The conversation and question constructs have been more or less open in structure. As researchers, we have used ourselves in relation to people; this evokes a psychological challenge between researches and the human objectiveness and psycho-logics that processes in and among all people at any given time6 (Fog 2004:7). Responsive interviewing7 gave us answers to incident that were not possible to directly observe. The self-report model8 and the observation value, in this debate, were desirable, valid and meaningful. It is adequate to believe that intuitive intelligence always has been utilized in some form as notions true its effects. The English poet Robert Graves9 (1895-1985) defines intuition as a super logic, which cuts out all the routine processes of thoughts, and leaps straight from problem to the answer “the ability to understand or know something immediately, without conscious reasoning”. It is reasonable to believe that this can happen since it is the mind that makes human brain superior to animal brains10. Fred Alan Wolf (1984) applied the concepts of quantum physics to the study of mind and human consciousness. His point of view is described in the following quotation: "Our brains follow the same basic laws of the whole universe. These laws are quantum mechanical, in our brain dance electrons and photons - the particles of light responsible for communication between electrons. The dance of electrons with light makes up our minds and provides the stability of our 85-percent water-filled brains. Thus it is that mind will not be found in any physical pattern of our brain material, but instead in quantum wave functions (Wolf, 1984). Wolf considered that the wave function is the mind and even the consciousness, the inner impressions”. In physical theories, Wolf considers “that events taking place in the physical world are matched to events in an internal space called the mental space”. The physical events, the external stimulus are classified according to time, spatial location, energy, and momentum. In a similar manner, the internal impressions and events can be classified as thoughts, sensations, feelings, and intuitions in the Jungian sense and every physical event has a corresponding mental event (Wolf 198411). Human has the motivation and the capacity to know that she or he is an individual with the ability to develop complete unique personalities, thoughts and actions. It is reasonable to think that humans also have the ability to accept the concept of intuition and intuitive effects; the challenge lies in the research questions, how is intuitive effects conceived within the cognitive theories, and what is the psychological effects of intuitive intelligence? It will be a central part of this study to provide the scientific accept for the conceptual intuition and the intuitive effects looking at the phenomena in the light of science. Our expectation is to understand the intuitive effects and adopt the understanding of this effect into actual and recognisable event. The idea of the psychological maturity of intuitive effects is an important factor to consider in determination whether the purpose of intuitive effects settings is to increase performance and persistency, and the rewards when successful, increases the effect of the gold on performance and persistence as quality statements in calculated risk. The designable difference of the concept intuitive effects seen from the philosophical or law oriented notion of theory, taps into the organisation of the concept towards other disciplines. Intuitive effects are a mixed construct of networking between knowledge and philosophical challenges within methods used in mainstream apertures12. Networkings are philosophical borrowings, and address a standard position13 of normative natural science in a dualistic framework drawn from the classics14. Utilising a contextual approach, we have been able to use comparison of theoretical15 and empirical trends to search for truly16intuitive effects in present situation17. What is understood as an intuitive effect, and what is a constructed intuitive notion, opens a discussion of realism and interpretation of the phenomena within the research question. Our finding is that people report that what is perceived as an intuitive effect is not only what you see or observe, but in a logical disciplinary positivistic observation modus, can correlate with effects identical and closely related to interaction of cognition, emotions, knowledge, rewards, risks, psychological infrastructure, instincts. The acceptance of intuitive effects is reported relate to scepticisms as seen in natural science of meta physics, where any statements of observations are based on the conception, maybe, but not only (study of atoms in research lab18). Several interviews started out with the scepticisms as if it really exist a phenomena as intuitive effects. The use of hypothetical deductive modelling gave the research a start as the best shot of understanding the effects of intuition. By introducing basis inputs to standard views, it was possible to rout the thinking and the justification of the results to models of connections in a network of disciplinary matrix, in order to end up with specific sets of symbols for causes and claims. A result of questioning people of their understanding of intuition and intuitive effects, we ended up with master examples that were used as base indexes. Content analyses gave wisdom to get it as right as possible, but the experiments did not control for everything. Building blocks of believes and cause of process can make intuitive mechanisms and pattern of intuitive social structures of human motivation to act and react are different from culture to culture. Language as a tool to self report on the phenomena and notion of intuitive effects created interesting syntaxes of linguistic as a dimension of the construct, just by simply understanding people when talking to them. Regression techniques and test of various approaches of intuitive effects, gave us some randomised control and understanding of the construct without hampering the knowledge of the concept. The phenomenology, we aimed for, were to capture the actual happening sequence of the effects of intuits and de-idealise prejudice and biases that existed. Toy models was used to build replica situations and thought experiments, testing and reflecting real life adversarial effects of intuits. Contradictions were tested by simplifying and isolation the object in a law like regularity. Extreme isolation of the object did not work, as people started acting and unrealistic prediction and assumptions made the model predictable in a consistent way. The momentum of the construct was vulnerable to stage settings as the human mind and soul easily adapts to complex cognitive forms and starts mental cause analysis controlling the process, where as the intuitive effect as seen in the research loses impact and value. The position and the contextual understanding of micro-connections and macros (“totality”) of the intuitive effects, addresses the contemporary rhetorical symbolism, the missing element in the conversion “knowing something you do not know you know”. The missing elements based on the contextual transparent position, make risk probability synthesise a subject consciousness in relationship to objects. The gateway to knowing stimulate actions. We should not be “persist in the traditional conception, according to which the thing to be known is something which exists prior to and wholly apart from the act of knowing (Dewey 1929)”19 The intuitive effects can be understood as a system of sensing – acting – knowing, a chain construct between man as an organism and the environment, a sensorial experience20. Before our research is concluded, our main findings are that people do have an understanding of intuitive effects, and do recognise the actuality of effect. The intuitive effects are, so far, not easy to identify since the phenomena is lacking references, and therefore difficult to verbally describe. The intuitive effects are seen as entry point, a starting point of other psychological effects, and as a quality control in the end of processes. So fare our research has establishes models of generalizability to be tested, and constructs within the phenomena have proven to identify common elements with general applied values. Read More