Indeed, there is justification to assume that the skill, capability, knowledge, and other attributes required for successful performance in team settings could be fairly different than the individual characteristics required in more customary individually focused tasks.For instance, it has been proposed that the knowledge, skills, and motivation required to work successfully in a team surpasses the integral technical skills typically evaluated in conventional selection frameworks. Others have emphasized that choosing individuals for teams demands one to take into account issues that are rarely regarded when selecting individuals to work independently.
Contextual performance, in comparison to task performance, is especially imperative in team contexts. Task performance manifests tasks that are officially identified as a component of the job, strengthen the technical heart of the organization, and strongly affect the goal accomplishment of the organization. This has been the emphasis in conventional, individually focused selection processes.Contextual performance, on the other hand, manifests tasks that strengthen the psychological, social, and organizational environment, and individual differences, thus enabling successful team performance.
For instance, the interpersonal support, initiative, and job commitment embodying contextual performance assist in making teams productive in organizational contexts. The lack of this form of contextual performance contributes to the development and survival failures of teams. LePine and colleagues (2000) actually have stressed that,Because individual task performance in teams requires cooperation among team members, acts of helpfulness could well be required aspects of task performance. However, helpful actions in teams will still have contextual implications.
...Download file to see next pages Read More