Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1676060-leadership
https://studentshare.org/management/1676060-leadership.
The shortage of competent business performers and the urge to motivate top-level managers have contributed to the rise in pay. However, it is indisputable that organizations should pay salaries that are proportional to their income.
If I was offered a high package to work in an organization that is laying off employees and on the verge of running bankrupt I would be hesitant to accept the offer. From a personal perspective, the cost of running an organization should be reflected by the organization performance. On this note, an organization that is laying off its employees and pays high salaries to the executives lacks the capacity to grow (Barkema & Gomez-Mejia, 2010). Notably, there are a number of reasons why organizations offer huge packages to their executive members. The main argument is to avoid executives turnover when business talent is limited and to motivate them to drive the organization to success.
My decision to accept or refuse a high package from a failing organization would have consequences. To begin with, paying a high salary to top-level management will increase the expenses to the organization (Barkema & Gomez-Mejia, 2010). From a personal perspective, accepting the job offer would increase my burden in handling my duties. I would be forced to seek alternative ways to reduce the cost of running the organization. I would prefer an organization that provides less pay but maintains its labor force intact. This way, I would work together with a strong team to achieve higher profits. Read More