Adaptive Project Framework, Traditional Project Management, and Extreme Project Management - Essay Example

AFP has its results on an incremental basis and more often compared to EPM which is not regular and whose results are not incremental.

However, TPM has also incremental outcomes. In the bargain, APF’s change is progression to an efficient solution similar to TPM but EPM has no progression change. The APF model offers increased business value in a certain time compared to the EPM model. EPM needs processes to start over from the original beginning point hence no value to the business. However, TPM also brings more value to the business. TPM has a fixed scope, while APF and EPM have a variable scope. TPM hates change while APF embraces change but EPM drives the change since it is necessary.

On planning, TPM is driven by a fixed plan while APF and EPM are driven by Just in time form of planning. TPM has a good breakdown structure, while APF has a middle-level work breakdown structure but EPM has no work breakdown structure (Wysocki 297-488). What’s more, all changes in APF and TPM are temporary while EPM are permanent. At the same time, the focus APF is drawn toward the delivery of products compared to EPM and TPM which are focused on the actual work itself. Lastly, there is a partnership strategy between the entire stakeholders which is critical in APF compared to EPM which lacks collaboration, and TPM which has minimal partnerships.