StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Quality Improvement in Health Care: Concepts Analyzed - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author states that quality improvement is a systematic and problem-based solution to combat growing pressures for better health provisions. Not only does it tackle the root problems in clinical practice, but it also considers the management approach in the different organizational structures…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.2% of users find it useful
Quality Improvement in Health Care: Concepts Analyzed
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Quality Improvement in Health Care: Concepts Analyzed"

 Quality Improvement in Health Care: Concepts Analyzed Introduction Ordinary people are bestowed with a single life, thus, they highly depend on health services when well-being manifests otherwise. Consequently, American citizens have high expectation regarding delivery of health services, as they must be “safe, effective...equitable, and efficient” (Lynn et al., 2007, p. 666). To meet them, experts suggest several tool parameters, “continuous quality improvement (CQI),” to enhance how services are provided. This is an organizational strategy between top management and clinical participants in establishing methodological processes and effective mechanisms that support high quality performance by all institutional staff during delivery of overall health services (Mclaughlin & Kaluzny, 2004). The encompassing definition shows the import of attaining provisions in quality health and services through competent CQI, although several aspects may account for its difficulty to thrive in hospital organizations. Foundation in Quality Improvement Quality improvement in clinical setting possesses complex nature. A valid study indicates its success lies on the elements surrounding such concept (see Figure 1 in Appendix A). In the illustration, a variety of influences affect the execution of quality improvement in clinical settings: “culture, implementation approach, perceived impact...clinical conditions, and bed size” (Shortell et al., 1995, p. 380). Each factor can alter the degree of health service delivery, giving them the critical role, and the necessary dynamics that can be assessed for significant evaluation of existing resistance. Despite the basic proponents in quality improvement, different perspectives emerge, depending on how improvement tool should be carried out for relevant participants. Kovner, Knickman, and Jonas (2008) identified four primary stakeholders directly involved in CQI: “providers, patients, payers, and policymakers” (p. 415). The health care team plays provider role, where they focus technical aspect of care, including application of medical knowledge and skills, and ethical standards in clinical service. They cater to patients, another stakeholder, who view quality care on the psychological side. For patients, quality improvement depends on expressed level of sincere attention and respectful care from health providers. Actual payers of treatments aspire to have technical and touch aspect of health services. Practical efficiency and emotional efficacy of clinical interventions must collaborate to bring excellent services that health team are supposed to provide. Lastly, policy makers seek to place regulatory measures to ensure that both clinical practice and professional attitudes are within institutional and societal boundaries (Kovner et al., 2008). All of them view quality improvement in different lights, but they all agree that improvements are closely needed. As presented earlier, health care providers and their patients profess different perceptions on quality improvement. Their belief clash impedes the full application of CQI. Health teams are integral in maintaining benchmarks dictated in quality improvement methods. They are the source with which clinical progress initially originates. Nonetheless, quality parameters cannot proceed without the cooperation of patients. Their full consent is crucial, since they will directly benefit from employed improvements. They are informed of potential risks and given opportunities to refuse (Lynn et al., 2007). With more patients declining, the probability of determining the efficacy of CQI is relevantly diminished. In this case, the collaboration of both providers and patients should be established before any steps towards attaining quality improvement are performed. Practical Appraisal on Quality Improvement The filtration of quality improvement in health industry is past overdue, as it strives to keep up with other economic industries (Mclaughlin & Kaluzny, 2004). This area is not solely involved in making profits, as lives are at stake. Irreparable health conditions may occur; in worst cases, deaths result. In quality improvement, ethical principles of doing good and doing no harm are ensured, safeguarding patients’ safety. Aside from these, continuous feature in improvement procedures assumes that appropriate clinical mechanisms must be employed in cost-efficient manner (Counte & Meurer, 2001). On internal level, clinicians are given opportunities for active involvement in administrative and leadership department. Their suggestions regarding clinical conduct and services are highly necessary for successful health operations (Weiner, Shortell, & Alexander, 1997). By this, direct association between clinicians and non-clinical employees are strengthened for better quality care collaboration. Quality improvement is an experiential learning regarding professional values and practice. On the clinicians’ side, full participation is rendered to deliver efficient and appropriate treatment interventions, with the inclusion of other responsibilities in scheduling work shifts, dispensing medications, and documenting clinical interventions (Lynn et al., 2007). Aside from basic medical obligations, three aspect of clinical discrepancies are expounded--underuse (more benefit versus less risk), overuse (less benefit versus more risks), and misuse (mismanagement of appropriate services) (Chassin, 1997). These forms exhibit faulty judgment by clinicians in executing professionals’ duties, hence, the need for quality improvement. To prevent and contain clinical damages, accrediting and regulatory bodies are established, from National Committee on Quality Assurance, Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations, and Institutional Review Boards, as well as specific clinical associations that evaluate educational and skilled competence of clinicians and allied health practitioners (Iglehart, 1996). They perform the task of assessing whether institutions and affiliated practitioners are following standardized practice dictate by state laws. In carrying such tasks, these organizations require cooperation of resource stakeholders, including “U.S. Health Resource and Services Administration, Institute for Health Care Improvement, National Health Service, and Veterans Health Administration’s Quality Enhancement Research Initiative” (Mittman, 2004, p. 897). They are influential organizations with capacities to persuade interested parties and associations on funding and supporting the practical cause of CQI. By doing so, initiation and sustenance in procedural and experiential application of CQI can proceed until its efficacy is evidently exhibited and integrated in hospital systems. Conclusion All in all, continuous quality improvement is a systematic and problem-based solution to combat growing pressures for better health provisions. Not only does it tackle the root problems in clinical practice, it also considers management approach in the different organizational structures. Such method clarifies involvement of non-clinical personnel in improvement system, proving its applicable dynamism in any institutional areas. Most importantly, as CQI seeks to significantly address conflicts in medical practice and management, this is guided by accrediting and regulating bodies, appraising both the institution as a whole and competency of practitioners it houses. In doing so, not only is CQI in the process of establishing its evidence-based qualifications on medical field, it proves that the method holds positive potentials in bringing what it aspires--delivering effective quality health improvements in a patient-cored concept. References Chassin, M.R. (1997). Assessing strategies for quality improvement. Health Affairs, 16 (3), 152-161. Counte, M.A., & Meurer, S. (2001). Issues in the assessment of continuous quality improvement implementation in health care organizations. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 13 (3), 197-207. Iglehart, J.K. (1996). The national committee for quality assurance. The New England Journal of Medicine, 335 (13), 995-999. Kovner, A.R., Knickman, J., & Jonas, S. eds. (2008). Health care delivery in the United States. 9th ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing House. Lynn, J.L., Bally, M.A., Bottrel, M., Jennings, B., Levine, R.J., Davidoff, F.,...James, B. (2007). The ethics of using quality improvement methods in health care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146 (9), 666-679. Mclaughlin, C.P., & Kaluzny, A.D. (2004). Continuous quality improvement in health care (2nd ed). Canada: Jones and Barlett Publishers. Mittman, B.S. (2004). Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140 (11), 897-901. Shortell, S.M., O’Brien, J.L., Carman, J.M., Foster, R.W., Hughes, E.F., Boerstler, H., & O’Connor, E.J. (1995). Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/ total quality management: Concept versus implementation. Health Services Research, 30 (2), 377-401. Weiner, B.J., Shortell, S.M., & Alexander, J. (1997). Promoting clinical involvement in hospital quality improvement efforts: The effects of top management, board, and physician leadership. Health Service Research, 32 (4), 491-510. Appendix A Figure 1. Framework on Factors in Implementing Quality Improvement (Shortell et al., 1995) Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Quality Improvement in Health Care: Concepts Analyzed Term Paper - 1, n.d.)
Quality Improvement in Health Care: Concepts Analyzed Term Paper - 1. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1575501-quality-improvement-report
(Quality Improvement in Health Care: Concepts Analyzed Term Paper - 1)
Quality Improvement in Health Care: Concepts Analyzed Term Paper - 1. https://studentshare.org/management/1575501-quality-improvement-report.
“Quality Improvement in Health Care: Concepts Analyzed Term Paper - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1575501-quality-improvement-report.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Quality Improvement in Health Care: Concepts Analyzed

Critical Issue of Homelessness

With the availability of better medical and health care facilities, life span expectancy has improved the world over.... n light of the fast economical changes taking place, the issue most important after the environment is health care for the aged, particularly those who are left alone and have nowhere to go.... Health promotional concepts have been emerging ubiquitously with encouraging response from the people of all age groups.... iven the opportunity, there could be no doubt the elderly would be only too happy to immerse themselves in activities which guide them in the art of health-promoting self-care behavior, self-efficacy, and self-care agency....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

The Improvement of Diabetes Care Concept

Result showed improvement in hospital stay and HbA1c control, but not significantly.... Juvenile diabetes is definitely more troublesome, as the patient has to deal with complete 'packing up' of pancreas. This study focuses on research and evidence based practice for the improvement of diabetes care concept by examining the recent evidence of research articles to apply for the use of self, professionals and families in order to improve care and empowering professionals....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

Health and Quality Care Administration

The essay 'Health and Quality Care Administration' raises the important question of continuous quality improvement - the management philosophy that organizations use to reduce waste, increase efficiency and increase internal (meaning, employees) and external (meaning, client) satisfaction - sorted out in the text in the context of healthcare.... hellip; Continuous quality improvement (CQI) has several philosophical elements.... nbsp; These elements include strategic focus, customer focus, systems view, data-driven analysis, implementer involvement, multiple causation, solution identification, process optimization, continuing improvement, and organizational learning....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Current Reform Efforts in Health Professions Education

The cost of healthcare and the increase in health care allocation by the government and various investors have given birth to various improvements and innovations in the rehabilitation and care of patients.... This entails stressing upon health care students the need to identify and respect the varied preferences, values, and needs of patients.... The reform efforts The current reform efforts in health professions education also focus on instructing members of the health care profession to work in interdisciplinary teams....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Quality Improvement Methods

Delays in customer service and duplicates in patient information are some of the most common wastes in health care organizations.... Six sigmaThis is a process improvement technique aimed at reducing errors and improving quality in health organizations.... The techniques help in improvement of processes and programs, assessing and providing response to needs… The prescribed methods comprises of the following; the six sigma, lean and Plan Do Check Act (PDCA). This is a process improvement technique aimed at reducing errors and improving quality in of affiliation Compare and contrast the following continuous quality improvement methods: Six Sigma, Lean, and PDCA (Plan Do Check Act)Continuous quality improvement (CQM) is a concept that is commonly applied in various organizations....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Triple Aim: Care, Health, and Cost

This paper deals with the implementation of the triple aims in the delivery of health care services throughout the world.... The improvement of health care depends on three aims; improvement of care, improvement of the health of the public and reduction of cost of providing health.... A health care system based on the three aims is more preferable than one which is based on only one aim.... Despite the obstacles, there are innovators who are challenging the current approach to health care delivery and they are in alignment with the objectives of the triple aim such as innovations in the medical home and Minute Clinics....
5 Pages (1250 words) Term Paper

Managing Quality in Health and Social Care

In HNS hospital, the management of the health care system is poor thus… The key stakeholders in the delivery of service in the institution are the receptionists, nurses, and doctors.... The clients can never approve anything concerning the quality of health care services because of the various preferences to the consultation service they have encountered or would like to have in place working for them (Mollenkopf and Alan 215).... The concept of quality in this case varies depending on the perspective of the users of the services....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

Different Aspects of Religious Health Care

Specific areas it touches including management roles and responsibilities of various types of health care institutions.... Further, impressive competence… The study also explores community, human resource management, Information services, customer services, and marketing and strategies (Olson & Gehm, 1988). Religion health care functions in a In order to scale up their productivity, the facility has to eliminate mistakes in its operation.... There are fundamental questions that this write-up will address in relation to the strategic performance of Religious health care as discussed below ( Milano, 1998)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us