Management for organizations - Research Paper Example

Management for organizations In the running of any business or organization, a proper management is very paramount. Management of any venture or business dictates whether or not the goals and achievements of the venture will be reached. In the formation of any business or organization, a management team is the most scrutinized team to be put in place. The team consists of extraordinary persons with the ability of creating a business empire with the help of the provided resources. The management team at all levels of a business should be well scrutinized. The most important part of managing organizations is to have an efficient management team at all levels of the organization. In analyzing a management system, the principles or the functions should be considered. It is from the functions of the management that analyzing of managing systems begins. Knowing and analyzing the functions of management helps generate the body’s validity, reliability and accuracy. Due to the validity and reliability of a management team, the results obtained from that particular organization provide the best data. From the data obtained, an assessment program can detect areas that need improvement (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010). For an assessment to be accurate, the analysis of management of an organization should be aimed at removing the sources of errors in the managing team. This paper will look into the five functions of management. It will also provide an assessment with the required validity and reliability. Additionally, the paper will provide an assessment analysis based on accuracy and how to provide an accurate assessment exercise. The five core principles of management are planning, organizing, staffing, leading and controlling. This is usually a process which starts from organizing and ends in controlling. Planning entails the creation of strategies to achieve certain goals. For instance, managers may be given a task of increasing the company’s sales. In the planning, they should find out what the most appropriate advertisement tool is – to advertise with the help of media or to create a sales force team. After planning, the organizing part commences. Organizing is the putting in place the strategies generated from the planning part. After organizing the managers will need a workforce to help them achieve their goals. The incorporation of the workforce is referred to as staffing. This entails training, recruiting and developing employees. After staffing, the managers should play the role of the leaders. With a plan in place and a working force in place, the managers need to be motivators and encouragers to their team. This brings the whole team together and the confidence level in the whole team is increases. Controlling entails keeping track of the project being undertaken. This also includes correcting mistakes which may occur in the course of the project. In controlling, a manager compares the goals set for the project and the development of the project. This ensures that the original set of goals is achieved. Due to the analysis of the functions of management the assessment process becomes easier, since for every step of management the requirements are well known. The outcome of proper management provides the best mode of analyzing its success. However, there should be an accurate process of determining whether or not a management strategy is successful. In analyzing the success of management, each principle should be analyzed separately. This provides room for accuracy and enables to determine which principle is affected negatively. According to Kubiszyn and Borich (2010), devising an evaluation plan for a management team requires the use of results the particular management has achieved in prior processes. The main problem when it comes to management evaluation is that the assessment results are usually not reliable and accurate (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010). If this happens, the manager may be advised to take on changes which will lead to negative results. This makes the situation even worse. A proper evaluation tool for any case of management needs to be accurate since the whole organization depends on the management processes for success. For example, a market assessment can provide a proposition that media marketing is the best mode of marketing. This proposition may be based on the assumptions or on the success of other products belonging to other organizations. If a manager takes this advice, the marketing strategy will fail since the assessment was not done in relation to the organization in question. Some negative factors should be excluded from the evaluation process – for example, the errors caused by assumptions. According to an argument by Kubiszyn and Borich (2010), assumptions should not be used when providing assessments for a management strategy. Assumptions are not reliable and do not provide valid information required. This distorts the accuracy of the whole assessment plan. Assumptions should be used in management if the results of the project undertaken are known. Kubiszyn and Borich (2010) argue that any management strategy that uses assumption faces numerous uncertainties. Another source of error in management is prediction of occurrences. In most cases prediction is adaptable in any process of management. However, when it comes to the assessment and evaluation, reliability and accuracy is the main goal, and prediction cannot provide that. Incorporating predictions in an assessment plan means that the process will be based on unknowns and will be dependable on other factors. This provides a significant room for errors, and a management plan can be easily distorted by that. The main enemy of validity and reliability are the errors caused by misinterpretation of data and results. This is mostly caused by human error and incompetency. Incompetency of staff at any level of management may provide great harm to the project being undertaken. To curb this, managers are advised to carry out a proper recruitment exercise when it comes to staffing. Organizing the staff should also be appropriate to provide all employees with their required specialization. While an assessment of management of organizations is performed, these sources of errors should be addressed. Additionally, these sources of errors should be analyzed in all the functions of management. According to Kubiszyn and Borich (2010), while providing an assessment strategy for a process, all steps involved in the process should be well analyzed and evaluated. This promotes accuracy in the whole process. In my assessment of the management in organizations, the importance of managers cannot be ignored. The assessment and evaluation of the functions of management and the management process provide the most accurate assessment data. This is because all the errors preset at the management process can be linked back to the incompetency of a manager or to the misuse of the principles of management. The results obtained from the evaluation of managers are reliable and valid. This scenario is different when the evaluation is done through human resources employed. To promote accuracy in this assessment, the evaluation process should be done more than once. This ensures that the errors that may have distorted the first evaluation process are not repeated. There is a lot of significance in providing an assessment for the management process. It provides managers with information about the errors that hinder the appropriate application of the functions of management. Additionally, this evaluation process aims at promoting competency and accuracy in the field of management (Kubiszyn & Borich, 2010). Many organizations that have assessed their management process record more successful implementation of their future projects. References Kubiszyn, T., & Borich G. (2010). Educational testing and measurement classroom application and practice (9th Ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons. Read More