Justify public administrators' - Research Paper Example

The personal points of view are necessary when formulating, assessing and looking for concrete plans of action for an administrative situation. However, it is better to question how an individual relays solutions through public service given bureaucracy follows certain levels of hierarchy. Weber asserted that there is a “logically consistent” function in his ideal type (Kim, 2007) In terms of public administration, how can this be achieved? This consistency, ultimately, faces difficulties before it can be achieved.

Now, before fully deliberating the ideal type of Max Weber, there should be a thorough knowledge of what public administration is. Public administration is a field of study that deals with the function of government as an institution and the general public it serves and how it handles the matters that involves society through centralized governance (Raadschelders, 2008). At the same time, public administration involves “organizational theory, management science and concept of public interest” (Henry, 1975). . Paradoxically, the ideal type, no matter how good it is can have its flaws not just on the manner of administration but also on the level of organization.

According to Weber, the problem that rises with the ideal type is oligarchy, dehumanization, and irrationality (Kim, 2007). How do these factors really affect the manner of how public administration is implemented within the organized structure of a system and the ideal type? The government really has a role as to how they will exercise governance effectively. Most of the time, the elite of a society take part on the administration government and has the capacity to determine the manner of governance they want to uphold (Raadschelders, 2008).

Now here lies the problem. How are people really guaranteed that efficient governance is achieved since the elite has a very strong capacity to maintain their hold on to power to further their personal interests rather than the interest of the general public. Corruption, abuse and exploitation together with irrational thinking distort the logical consistency that the ideal type imposes. Democracy, in its context, is good yet the manner of administration becomes undemocratic especially if the consistency of labour is not administered properly.

Public administration also calls for objective criticism (Henry, 1975). As seen in the local and global contemporary politics, criticisms have been rampant to fully expose the flaws of the bureaucratic status quo. In its greatest sense, bureaucracy is good yet the manner of addressing criticisms, especially in the case of the leader, is not really adequate. They may recognize their flaws in terms of leadership that destroys the logical consistency asserted by Weber’s ideal type yet concrete plans of