Free

# Econometrics - Assignment Example

Summary
A simplified version of their model, which is to be studied, is
RM is the average number of rooms in owner occupied housing in the…

## Extract of sample "Econometrics"

Lecturer’s and Number Submitted Econometrics In an influential article, ‘‘Hedonic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air," David
Harrison and Daniel Rubinfeld study the impact of improvements in air quality on local citizens as reflected through differences in housing prices. A simplified version of their model, which is to be studied, is
ln(MVi) = β0 + β1RMi + β2 ln(DISi) +β3NOXi + β4DCHAS;i + Ɛi , (1)
where the level of observation is the census tract. Further, MVi is the median housing price (measured in \$1,000) for a given census tract in the Boston metropolitan statistical area.
RM is the average number of rooms in owner occupied housing in the census tract; DIS is a weighted distance to five major employment centers in the Boston region, NOX measures nitrogen oxide concentrations in parts per hundred million. DCHAS is a dummy variable which signifies if the Charles River passes through the census tract, i.e. DCHAS = 1 if the Charles river passes through and 0 otherwise.
Consider the table below showing the estimation of the 3 variants of the model that has the coefficients of each variant;
Dependent variable: ln MV
(1)
(2)
(3)
RM
0.329
0.306
0.294
ln(DIS)
(0.028)
(0.027)
(0.027)
0.197
0.059
0.055
(0.031)
(0.052)
(0.049)
NOX
1.479
1.529
(0.242)
(0.238)
DCHAS
0.234
(0.050)
Observations
506
506
506
R2
0.464
0.516
0.537
2
0.461
0.513
0.533
R
BP Test
< 0:001
< 0:001
< 0:001
White Test
< 0:001
< 0:001
< 0:001
RESET Test
< 0:001
< 0:001
< 0:001
1. Interpretation of the estimates in the model
For RM (average number of rooms in the owner occupied housing in the census tract), in the first variant, a 1 percent change in RM causes 0.329 % change in MV (the median housing price). In the second variant, a 1 percent change in RM causes a 0.0306 % change in the median housing price (MV). Eventually, a 1 percent changes in RM causes a 0.294 % change in the median housing price in the third variant.
In the second variable, the weighted distance to five major employment centers in the Boston region (DIS), the order of coefficients; 0.028, 0.027, and 0.027 in absolute values. In the criteria of absolutism, a one percent change in DIS causes a reduction of median housing price by 0.028 in the first variant, a reduction of 0.027 in the second variant, and a reduction of 0.027 in the third variant.
In the third variable, nitrogen oxide concentrations in parts per hundred million (NOX), the coefficients are 1.479 and 1.529 in the second and third variants respectively. These figures suggest that 1 percent change in nitrogen oxide concentration increases the medium housing price by 1.479 in the second variant and by 1.529 in the third variant.
2. The estimate of the intercept of the estimate model (1) using the beta coefficients approach
Beta coefficient is the measure of the sensitivity of the estimates in influencing the median housing price. In the estimates, the beta coefficient is the slope of the model summarized into β0, β1, β4, β3, and β2.
3. 10) Estimating model (1) using beta coefficients produces estimates of 1 and 2 of 0.566 and 0.261, respectively. What is the interpretation of these coefficient estimates?
Normally, the coefficients would imply 1 percentage change in the estimate 1 and 2 would cause an increase of 0.566 and 0.0261. However, using the beta approach, the two coefficients are below, suggesting that they are below the median housing price.
4. State formally the null and alternative hypotheses that ln(DIS) does not have a positive influence on median housing values.
Null Hypothesis; Ho: The weighted distance to five major, employment centers in the Boston region (DIS) does not have a positive influence on median housing values
Alternative hypothesis, H1: the weighted distance to five major employment centers in the Boston region (DIS) have positive influence on median housing values.
5. Comment on the fact that b2 has changed sign and significance (at conventional levels) from model (1) to model (2) but b1 has not. Use sound economic reasoning.
b2 and b1 measures the changes that occurs on the variants visa-a-vie the dependent variable. At conventional levels, they changed their signs due to low or no significance.
6. Suppose in model (3) I added in the variable NOX DCHAS, resulting in ln(MVi) = β0 + β1RMi + β2 ln(DISi) +β3NOXi + β4DCHAS;i + β5 NOX DCHAS +Ɛi . How would the interpretation of Ɛ3 change in model (3) after the inclusion of this variable? What is the interpretation of Ɛ5 in this model?
Ɛ3 implies the coefficient of the nitrogen oxide concentrations
Ɛ5implies the constrained coefficient of the nitrogen oxide concentration
7. In general can we say that heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors are always larger than regular standard errors?
Using robust standard errors in determining heteroskedasticity is always larger than the regular standard errors in economic practice
8. Under the circumstances, an hypothesis test would be involved in the following model and steps:
Model: ln(MVi) = β0 + β1RMi + β2 ln(DISi) +β3NOXi + β4DCHAS;i + Ɛi
Hypothesis Testing
Doing a t-test (independent)
Analyze / Compare means / Independent-samples T-test
Test variable = interval/ratio
Grouping variable = nominal
9. Given that the BP and White tests yield the same conclusion regarding the presence of heteroskedasticity, does this imply that the BP test is as good as the White test? Explain your reasoning in detail.
Heteroskedasticity implies to the circumstance when the variability of a variable is unequal across the range of values of a second variable that predicts it. In this circumstance, it means that the Bp test is as good as the white test since in the presence of heteroskedasticity, it is expected to be different for variability, which is not the case.
10. If there was heteroskedasticity in model (3), say, is there a concern that your parameter estimates are biased? Explain in detail.
Heteroskedasticity does not necessarily imply an error, but only imply variableness, i.e. variability of a variable is unequal across the range of values of a second variable that predicts it. However, it may raise concern of biasness in the parameter estimation. Read More
Cite this document
• APA
• MLA
• CHICAGO
(“Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1688291-econometrics
(Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1688291-econometrics.
“Econometrics Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1688291-econometrics.
Click to create a comment or rate a document

## CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Econometrics

### Econometrics

...?Econometrics Regression Model Question A The other hypothesis to be investigated by this regression was weather the level of education of women had an impact on their level of availability or participation in the work place. This was to be monitored using the coefficient educ. The availability and increase of other sources of income for the family was also considered to find out weather the same affected their level of commitment at work. This was done using the variable nwifeinc. The estimated coefficients had the signs as expected and were of statistical significance, this was demonstrated clearly buy the patterns displayed by the respective graphs of the variable coefficients. It therefore demonstrated beyond any...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

### Econometrics

...in the dependent variable are explained by changes in the independent variables. Including an insignificant variable as one of the independent variables may minimize the effects of the actual variable causing the variation in the independent variable. Like in the example above, if truly age is not a determinant of income as stated in equation 1, then including it like in equations 2 and 3 will minimize the actual effects of education on income. BIBLIOGRAPHY Greene W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. Fifth Edition. Prentice Hall. Pearson Education International. Anderson D. R., Sweeney D. J., Williams T. A. (2005). Statistics for Business and Economics. Ninth Edition. Thomson...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

### Econometrics

...Part The key hypothesis in this paper is that “Democracies have bad rood conditions compared to autocratic rule holding all other explanatory variables constant”.. This means that governments in the world which are perceived or are build on democratic principles have poor rood networks. The authors motivates this hypothesis by first looking at the reasons why autocratic governments may be forced to have good roads probably to enable troops to move around in case of both internal and external aggressions. Further, the author argues that autocratic government’s belief that good infrastructure facilities tend to blind the electorate. On the other hand, democratically elected governments due to the aspect of resource distribution may... The key...
5 Pages(1250 words)Speech or Presentation

### Econometrics

...Question No. 8 Box and Jenkins utilized sample autocorrelation function and partial autocorrelation functions to identify order of an ARMA (autocorrelated moving average) model. If y0, y1, ... yT-1 are a sequence of values from a process, the sample autocorrelation function is Rt = ct / c0, t = 0, 1, ..., T-1 Where Ct = 1/T ∑ (yi – y-bar)(yi-t – y-bar) Is the empirical autocovariance at lag t and c0 is the sample variance. The sample partial autocorrelation pt at lag t is the correlation between the two sets of residuals obtained from regressing yi and yi-t on the set of values in between them. Box and Jenkin’s method has three steps, namely model selection, model estimation and model checking. Frequently Box and Jenkin’s... No. 8 Box and...
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment

### Econometrics

...ECONOMETRICS PART Question a) From table the correlation coefficient between health status and years of education is 0.33. When the correlation coefficient in absolute values is between 0.1 and 0.5, there is a weak correlation between the variables and when the values are between 0.5 and 0.9 there is a strong correlation. In this case, there is a weak positive correlation between the two variables. Since the coefficient is positive, there is a positive linear relationship between health status and years of education. When years in education increase, there is an improvement in health status of the individual. Question 1 (b) i. Number of doctor visits and gender The results of the regression are demonstrated in table 2....
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

### Econometrics

...work Finance and Accounting Econometrics Question Model2 (Model 2) read = 419.7 – 18.6 * noroom – 50.0 * noeng + 29.4 * fiction N = 11984, R2 = 0.204 (1.7) (2.6) (3.1) (0.6) Interpretation of the coefficient for noroom Because noroom is one of the continuous variables, its coefficient is represented by -18.6 which is a constant. If the value of noroom increases, the model value reduces Hypothesis test In order to test for the hypothesis, we use t test as follows t = (1.7-2.6)/(3.1/SQRT(18.6)) = The t score is less than 0.5 at the 5% significance level (Dougherty, 2008). This confirms the null hypothesis, that the parameter is -20 against the alternative hypothesis that the parameter is greater than -20. Question 2 The...
3 Pages(750 words)Coursework

### Econometrics

... Question 3 Use the data set shorttbills.wf1. Limit the sample so that it begins in 2002. Regress the three month treasury bill rate (tb3ms) on the lagged three month rate and the twice lagged 6 month rate (tb6ms(-2)). Do the coefficients make much sense? (Okay, explain why they don’t.) Test, at the 1% level, for first-order serial correlation using the Breusch-Godfrey test. Now run the regression correcting for serial correlation by including AR(1) in the regression. Do the coefficients make sense now? Correct for second order serial correlation (add AR(1) and AR(2)). How about the coefficients now? The regression output looks like Dependent Variable: TB3MS Method: Least Squares Date: 09/17/12 Time: 15:24 Sample: 2002M01... Question 3...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

### Econometrics

... Econometrics Question Required coefficients in the estimate table become evident through writing of the needed estimates using the fitted model, μ12 will be = (ΣkY12k)/n12 = (Σkμ)/n12 + (Σkα1)/n12 + (Σkβ2)/n12 + (Σkαβ12)/n12 + (Σkε12k)/n12 We then assume that averages of the errors in this context are zero (εijk): = μ + α1 + β2 + αβ12 Question 2 In the same way, the mean in table 1 will be: μ11 = μ + α1 + β1 + αβ11 Getting the estimates of table 1 mean, add the estimates at μ, α1, β2, and αβ12. Achieving this goes by multiplying the solution vector with a vector coefficients (e.g. Sum-product) Solution for Coefficient estimates Effect a b Estimate Standard Error DF t Value Pr > |t| Intercept     21.6100 0.2958 72 83.21 <.0001 a 1... Econometrics...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

### Econometrics

...APPLIED ECONOMETRICS Q1. Interpretation of estimated coefficients in model 3 from table Table shows the least ordinary squares (OLS) of regressions of log per capita income on protection against expropriation variable in a variety of samples. The values in the brackets are the standard errors, occurred during the research. On average, if a country has a protection against expropriation of 10 percent, then per capita income increases by 4.3%, ceteris paribus (100 ×0.43 × 0.1 = 4.3%). For 0.37, the concept is the same. However, negative values of the estimates (-0.62, -1.00 and -0.25) show a reduction and not an increment in per capita income. The protection against expropriation was measured on a scale from 0-10, where a...
8 Pages(2000 words)Assignment

### Econometrics

...Applied Econometric paper s Affiliation Introduction This paper gives answers to certain questions regarding a study by Acemoglu, Johnson & Robinson (2001): Colonial Origins of Comparative Development. In their study, they claim that countries with quality institutions and secure property rights appear to have higher economic growth than their counterparts. From the econometric model adopted by Acemoglu, Johnson & Robinson (2001), the following questions will be answered appropriately. Question 1 The coefficient estimate (β1) measures how economic growth increases due to the increase in institutions ` quality. Therefore, economic growth will increase by 43% whenever the quality of institution increases...
11 Pages(2750 words)Speech or Presentation