The is a short paper written in the style of a letter to the editor in the Wall Street Journal - Assignment Example

Address, Phone, Email address 23rd September, The Editor, The Wall Street Journal, Address. RE: Skeptics Facing Pentagon’s Weapons PushDear Editor, I salute Doug Cameron, who highlighted the issue of the Pentagon’s move to encourage military contractors to invest more of their private funds in developing better arms. The article titled Pentagon’s Weapons Push Faces Skeptics appeared in your magazine on 22nd September, 2014. Cameron acknowledged that encouraging military contractors to broaden their research focused on advancing the United States’ military abilities is a worthy cause.

Pentagon, as he stated, realized that most firms shy away from bidding on Pentagon’s offerings on the same since they end up overspending through underbidding. The previous type of acquiring Pentagon’s projects through bidding has been keeping bidders away since complex projects led to (extra) impulse spending. Relying on contractors, as was the case in the past, can be termed as the reason why emerging nations such as Russia and China have been overshadowing our military. The reasons behind this include unnecessary expenditure, longer research times, and an overall lagging military force.

This move concurs with the 2010 initiative titled “Better Buying Power” which sought to incorporate more military research in evaluating which resources were required, and how much they cost. This task was previously mandated to other contractors. If this trend is furthered, we are bound to experience lesser violation of federal performance and costs. I agree that as the United States, we possess sufficient reasons to expand our weapons research programs, and this will be achieved by decreasing our reliance on ‘other” contractors and encouraging more military contractors.

Yours Sincerely, Name Works CitedCameron, Doug. “Pentagon’s Weapons Push Faces Skeptics”, The Wall Street Journal, 2014. Web. 23 Sept. 2014.