Summarize the main points Griffin, Khan and Ickowitz make in favor of redistributive land reforms - Assignment Example

Redistributive Land reform Land Reforms have gained attention of several scholars throughout different times; the main objective of the reform is to reduce inequalities. Redistributive land reform refers to advocating the peasants and farmers by providing employment and increasing production output through the land (Griffin and Khan). This reflection paper aims to discuss the significance of redistributive land reform the authors have discussed in the articles (Griffin and Khan). It provides insight to the historical significance of the redistributive land reforms to eliminate poverty in the society (Griffin and Khan).

In addition, the authors argue the redistribution land reform of the twentieth century developed a broader vision of land reforms in 1920’s and 1970’s.Land Reform is considered to an effective effort to overcome the unequal distribution of the allocation of the land ownership and the use of rights. Land policies have historically played a significant role to shape experience of different countries (Griffin and Khan). Griffin and Khan (reviews the previous argument and compares it with the contemporary land reform policies.

In addition, the author favor redistributive land reform on the bases of segmented factor market and labor control systems. Similarly, Ray elaborates economical benefits and significances of the land reforms in the contemporary times. In the article, he draws attention of the reader towards the unequal distribution of land that has a major obstacle in the development of economy. In addition, the author highlights economic efficiency in agriculture through political, environmental and economic perspectives (Ray).

Analyzing the both article, it shall be noted that both authors have highlighted importance of the redistributive land reforms. Griffin and Khan highlights the significance to the issue through discussing the historical issues (Griffin and Khan). It further incorporates arguments throughout the time to develop a broader understanding towards the land reform (Griffin and Khan). I believe the statistical and historical data and information provides a brief understanding towards the issues. Ray illustrates the importance of equal distribution of land as a source of economic growth and prosperity.

Ray focuses on the effective and maximizing output of the land, as a social, environment and economical prosperity (Ray). I believe the article develops importance and significance of the issue with the economical aspect. It associates unequal distribution of land market as an important element for the proper functioning for the development of the economy. The authors of the both article provide a great insight about the problems that are faced due to unequal land distribution. Griffin and Khan illustrate that the redistributive land reform shall promote equality, whereas, it shall promote economic prosperity as a cure to poverty.

On the other hand, Ray discusses the issue as economic issues that shall eventually affect political, social and environmental aspects of the society (Ray). I believe both authors have provided a brief insight to the issues. Griffin and Khan suggest the poverty shall be eliminated from the society through the redistributive land reform. According to Ray, Redistributive Land Reform shall enhance economic prosperity and shall not only provide economic prosperity but also address several other problems of the society.

Therefore, I believe that the arguments of Ray provide broad information on the issues, whereas Griffin and Khan have a narrow approach to address the issue. Works CitedGriffin, Keith and Azizur Rahman Khan. "Poverty and Distribution of Land." Journal of Agrarian Change (2002): 279-330. Print.Ray, Debraj. Development Economic. New York: Princeton University Press, 2011. Print.