StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

What Is the Relationship between Globalization, Poverty and Inequality - Coursework Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "What Is the Relationship between Globalization, Poverty and Inequality" discusses that poverty and inequality have been an offshoot of human development starting from the rapid human industrial activity. If one looks at the problems produced, the solutions lie in correcting the flaws…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.8% of users find it useful
What Is the Relationship between Globalization, Poverty and Inequality
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "What Is the Relationship between Globalization, Poverty and Inequality"

What is the relationship between globalization, poverty and inequality? Since 1980s the integration of the global trade, investment and immigration has steadily materialized in the spirit of globalization. The emergent global is seen as ideal because such structural integration of the international economy encouraged the mobility of wealth creating assets, launched the renaissance of the market system, increased the need opportunities with the global market, created competitive pressures that prompted the sourcing and production of goods, and provided the ease of environment allowing for fast, cost-effective transborder trade and communication. (Tharackan, Bulcke and Plasschaert 1998, p. 81) However, people started to criticize globalization as it labored forward. In the history of this phenomenon, there emerged several debates in regard particularly questioning its economic, political, social and cultural effects. One of the most controversial of these is that the global economic integration is starting to contribute a major part in the increasing incidence of poverty around the world. Specifically, there is the claim that globalization is beneficial only to the rich countries and rich population than to the poor. This paper will outline the relationship between globalization and global inequality and global poverty. In the process, it is expected that the forces that underpin globalization and the issues that concern the evolution of the global political system and the development of governance would be demonstrated. Background There are earlier waves of globalization that occurred prior to the globalization that we have today. The period between 1820 and 1914, for instance, demonstrated an increase in the ratio of trade to gross domestic product driven by the development of steam shipping and by the start of the French and American trade partnership. According to David Held and Ayse Kaya, the world during this period reached levels of economic integration comparable in many ways to those of today, adding further: From the end of World War II to about 1980, industrialized countries restored much of the integration that had existed among them. They negotiated a series of mutual trade liberalizations under the auspices of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). (p. 76) This does not mean, however, that globalization originated during this period alone or that it is a recent phenomenon. Essentially, globalization does not have a starting point. Rather the trend had a long gestation period with no particular timeline of conception. Jan Scholte cited three phases of globalization to date. To quote: First, global consciousness began to tease secular imaginations half a millennium ago. Second, supraterritoriality made its initial more substantial appearances from the middle of nineteenth century and spread at a mostly gradual rate for the next hundred years. Third, global relations have mainly proliferated and attained their greatest significance since the 1960s. (p. 62) While the concept of globalization is not entirely novel and that its incidence, as this paper has pointed out, occurred in earlier periods of human history, the internationalization of business and capital trade from 1960s onwards are unprecedented, with the added dimension of increased international migration and the integration and openness that characterized the modern global economy. The role of China was important in hastening globalization since the trend for global integration became speedier after its market started to open to the world in 1978 and revamped its economic policy, a development that coincided with the oil crisis, which, for its part, contributed greatly to the external debt crises that swept Latin America and in other Third World countries. These developments affected the way other economies in Latin America, South Asia and Africa developed their own strategies. According to Held and Kaya, this complemented globalization because the majority of developing economies shifted from an inward-focused strategy to a more outward-oriented one. (p. 76) And the rest is history. What must be underscored with the evolution of globalization is that today it has so permeated the globe that it became the international system that strongly influences domestic politics as well as the foreign relation policies of virtually every country. Globalization and Poverty The World Bank – the main barometer for the global poverty evaluation said through the then bank’s president James Wolfensohn (2002), “Over the past 20 years the number of people living in less than $1 a day has fallen by 200 million, after rising steadily for 200 years.” (p. 6) In the organization’s World Development Report 2005, it reported that nearly half of the world’s people live on less than $2 a day and the 1.2 billion barely survive on less than $1 a day.” (p. 189) However, there are those who do not believe in these figures. For instance, Robert Wade argued that the World Bank’s new methodology of poverty measurement does not result into the true and accurate state of poverty across the globe. He specifically cited the new $PPP1.08 international poverty line as faulty since it significantly lowered national poverty lines in 77 percent of the 94 countries for which data are available, containing 82 percent of their population. (in Held and Koenig-Archibugi, p. 20) Wade’s point is that the new poverty line would not be representative of the real situation due to the fact that the global average consumption patterns, on which the international poverty line is based, geared toward services whose relative prices are much lower in poor than in rich countries, allows the false impression that the increase in the cost of the basic consumption of goods required by the poor is lower than it is. This makes sense since the poverty line is generalizing poverty and disregarding variables such as the differences in consumption patterns, the differences between the cost of living between urban and rural areas, and so forth. Considering the above variables, it is difficult to determine which side is true, whether poverty is being eradicated or whether it is worsening. This is particularly frustrating because the true trend could finally confirm whether globalization leads to an increase in global poverty or that it improves peoples’ lives. Although this paper recognizes the validity of Wade’s argument, the current figures on the global poverty trends per the World Bank estimates, although may not be accurate, is too large to ignore and that, generally, it shows a positive development. Furthermore, this aspect may be different from the issue of inequality generated by globalization and hence would be discussed separately. Left to its natural course, globalization could indeed reduce poverty. The very concept is promising and is actually better than most economic models of international trade. With the integration of the global market, national borders are eradicated and opportunities are created with the faster flow of financial capital and goods, which are further buttressed by innovations in technology and communications. Held, writing with Koenig-Archibugi, declared: evidence from the current wave of globalization thus confirms the predictions of neoliberal economic theory – that more open economies are more prosperous, that as any one economy liberalizes it experiences a faster rate of progress, and that those who resist economic liberalization must be acting out of special interests. (p. 18) Despite the above facts, however, new issues emerged that demonstrate the possible weakness of globalization. The developments today points to the fact that the movement is being taken advantage by transnational corporations in such a way that freedom in international trade becomes a tool to maximize profits at the expense of the environment, public safety and labor protection. Along with the idea about the domination of the corporations of the global market, comes the proposition that globalization is spiraling out of control. This is reflected in the so-called danger signals outlined by Abbas Ali (2000), identifying the misery caused by the current globalization trend: 1. Wages and social environmental conditions tend to fall to the level of the most desperate. 2. Lower wages and reduced public spending means less buying power, leading to stagnation, recession and unemployment aggravated by the accumulation of national debt. 3. The reduction of the individual’s and communities’ capabilities to shape their own destiny. 4. The rise of transnational corporations, the world’s most powerful economic actors that are not subjected to any degree of corporate accountability. 5. The production of chaotic and destructive rivalries. (p. 113-114) Globalization and Inequality A good number of literature available on the subject would point to a relationship between globalization and inequality. There is a lack of empirical evidence that would support this, particularly on the causal relationship of these two variables, but there is circumstantial legitimacy in such a claim. Goethals, Sorenson and Burns, stated that currently, the level of income inequality in the world stands at least as high as inequality in the most unequal nations. (p. 575) This is further supported by statistics that paints a disturbing scenario: 900 million people residing in the Western world enjoy 86 percent of the world’s consumption expenditures, 79 percent of world income, 58 percent of world energy consumption and 74 percent of all telephone lines and that by comparison, the poorest 1.2 billion of the world’s population have to share only 1.3 percent of world’s consumption, 4 percent of world energy consumption, and 1.5 percent of all telephone lines. (Held 2004, p. 34) It is, hence, not difficult to understand the link especially with the idea that in the vastness of the global economic system, the economic elite and the powerful economies tend to dominate. A specific argument that demonstrates the role of globalization in the incidence of inequality concerns the policy distortion that is prevalent among developed countries. There is a tendency among the economic elites to harm the investment climates of poor countries. This is illuminated in the tariff barriers being set in place on goods that could help alleviate poverty in the Third World. In addition, developed countries are also notorious for their support and subsidies on domestic industries. Talking about its repercussions, the World Bank stressed: Tariff escalation is particularly harmful because it reduces opportunities for developing countries to diversify away from commodities by expanding into higher-value-added products. It has been estimated that removing the various distortions imposed by developed countries could deliver gains to developing countries of $85 billion in 2015 0 or more than four times the development assistance currently provided for investment climate improvements. (World Bank p. 190) David Held also pointed to the “rapidly diverging patterns of life chances between men and women” stressing that this and the other points, as raised by this paper, underscore that while globalization may work for some countries, for some regions, for some people, it certainly does not work for all. (p. 37) Conclusion These – the arguments outlined by this paper - are not to say that globalization is now a global menace that it became the main culprit behind the incidence of global poverty. After all, it operates in specific contexts and is still influenced by policy interventions on national and transnational levels. Furthermore, poverty and inequality has been an offshoot of human development starting from the rapid human industrial activity. If one looks at the current problems produced, the solutions lie not in the replacement of the economic model but in correcting the flaws. For example, international rights and standards must be established or the enforcement of code of conduct that would govern international corporations and institutions. Furthermore, it is important to underscore that globalization is an evolving phenomenon. The problem that produces inequality, (i.e. the tariff reduction and subsidies on certain industries) are still being discussed and negotiated by countries, undermined by the influence of industrialized economies and the independent bilateral and multilateral trade agreements that are consequences of politics and client. Presently, these still remain as agenda languishing on bargaining tables. The flaws of globalization are not fundamentally structural. Instead, most of it comes from the failure of states to commit to the idea that it espouses. Countries, especially the rich economies, are still resistant to eliminate trade barriers, opting to protect domestic industries. Then, there is the lack of a governing mechanism that would regulate the conduct of multinational corporations to prevent their excesses and made them accountable for their acts and force them to follow international standards - not just in the context of business, production, wage, human rights, - but also in the area of ethics. References Ali, Abbas. Globalization of business: practice and theory. New York: Routledge, 2000. Goethals, George, Sorenson, Georgia and Burns, James. Encyclopedia of Leadership. SAGE, 2004. Held, David. Global covenant: the social democratic alternative to the Washington Consensus. Wiley-Blackwell, 2004. Held, David and Kaya, Ayse. Global inequality: patterns and explanations. Polity, 2007. Held, David and Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias. Taming globalization: frontiers of governance. Wiley-Blackwell, 2003. Scholte, Jan. Globalization: a critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan, 2000. Tharakan, Matthew, Bulcke, D. and Plasschaert, Sylvain. International trade, foreign direct investment, and the economic environment: essays in honour of professor Sylvain Plasschaert. Palgrave Macmillan, 1998. Wolfensohn, James. A case for aid: building consensus for development assistance. World Bank Publications, 2002. World Bank. World Development Report 2005: Investment Climate, Growth and Poverty. World Bank Publications, 2004. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(What Is the Relationship between Globalization, Poverty and Inequality Coursework, n.d.)
What Is the Relationship between Globalization, Poverty and Inequality Coursework. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1561947-what-is-the-relationship-between-globalisation-poverty-and-inequality
(What Is the Relationship Between Globalization, Poverty and Inequality Coursework)
What Is the Relationship Between Globalization, Poverty and Inequality Coursework. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1561947-what-is-the-relationship-between-globalisation-poverty-and-inequality.
“What Is the Relationship Between Globalization, Poverty and Inequality Coursework”. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1561947-what-is-the-relationship-between-globalisation-poverty-and-inequality.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF What Is the Relationship between Globalization, Poverty and Inequality

The pros and cons of Globalization

Regardless of the popularity given to this concept a number of areas are still left to be explored about globalization.... The… ent discussions on globalization involve the arguments on its existence, the importance given to it today as compared to the past, the change in the concept of nation and citizenship because of globalization, the importance of globalization as against regionalism and localism.... addition a crucial debate is continuously rising on weighing the positive and negative impacts of globalization and exploring the people who are directly or indirectly influenced by the changes brought in by this concept....
14 Pages (3500 words) Essay

The Contribution of Globalization in Transforming the Modern State

In the paper “Social Development” the author analyzes political development and social growth in the context of globalization.... He explores the contribution of globalization in transforming the modern state.... Modern and pre modern globalization take different historical forms....  … The author states that the primary focus of modern globalization in transformation of the society lies in the area of economic development....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Impact Of Economic Globalization In The World

The main objective of the dissertation "The Impact Of Economic globalization In The World" is to elucidate the impact of economic globalization on countries.... The dissertation also aims to clarify the debate regarding the issue of economic globalization.... The participation in the global market of countries is made possible by the reality of globalization.... The participation in the global market of countries is made possible by the reality of globalization....
45 Pages (11250 words) Dissertation

Globalization about Poverty

Others also argue that globalization is promoted by the rich to benefit them economically while the poor having less benefits in… In my view, I believe that globalization is less beneficial since the world poverty is slowly declining and the global inequality is still evident in most parts of the world.... In order to fully analyze the impact of globalization on poverty, we need to fully determine he income accrual to individuals globally and access the basic living standards of all the societies in the world....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Does Wealth Inequality Matter

Wealth distribution and inequality matters most not because it stokes the flames leading to envy, but because it drives debilitating dissension and creates instability in the society.... These factors include the possible link between income inequality, sustainability of growth and crises (Castaeda et al.... It is observed that globalisation is creating pressures that ultimately increase inequality levels in the contemporary society.... However, the best means to address the political problem of envy is undoing the system of the… Those systems do turn those who are envy into a perverse alliance with the most prideful of all (Keister & Moller 2000). Sustained growth is vital for the reduction of The rapid growth and development that has been witnessed in several parts of the world over the last years has led to a significant decrease in the levels of poverty....
15 Pages (3750 words) Essay

Globalization Influences Poverty And Income Inequality

Poverty is decreasing globally and inequality after 100 years is flattening off, this is a worthy result; however, it is not an indication that all is good in our fresh globalized economy.... This study attempts to provide some intuitions in the affiliation amongst income inequality, poverty, and globalization.... Various income inequality and poverty measures are applied to show how they are connected to globalization.... This are the debt issue of Africa's exposed economies, the big number of nations where development is minimal and the inequality is on the rise, the susceptibility of the developing nations, and the nations that have incorporated the liberalizing developments of the Washington consensus....
10 Pages (2500 words) Research Paper

Globalisation Causes Poverty

here is a close link between globalization and incidences of poverty across the globe.... nbsp;The link between globalization and poverty has been debated among policymakers and economists for decades.... The essay 'Globalisation Causes poverty' analyzes and discusses the arguments that globalization is the cause of the growth of poverty in the world, and also provides arguments against this statement.... The paper critically evaluates the argument that globalization causes poverty in third-world countries of the world by reviewing research evidence....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Inequality, Poverty, and Environmental Health

"Inequality, Poverty, and Environmental Health" paper siscusses how is the trend of globalization and inequality affects the relationships between chronic poverty and health.... poverty and health are closely related.... On the other hand, inequality is a form of discrimination where one individual feels more superior to the other.... There are, however, different forms of inequality.... On the other hand, inequality is a form of discrimination where one individual feels more superior to the other....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us