StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
Name Professor Course Date John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek Since the end of World War 2, the fundamental and conflicting ideals pertaining to economic freedom between Friedrich von Hayek and John Maynard Keynes have engulfed the economic landscape for a long time…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.1% of users find it useful
John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek"

John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek Since the end of World War 2, the fundamental and conflicting ideals pertaining toeconomic freedom between Friedrich von Hayek and John Maynard Keynes have engulfed the economic landscape for a long time. Evidently, both of these renowned economists advanced different perspectives concerning economic freedom pertaining to markets, monetary policy, and fiscal policy. It is important to note that both economists believed the effect of economic ideas on public policy was enormous. In the period after Word War 2, there was a pertinent economic question that sought to examine the right role that government should play in the economy. According to Keynes, the governments’ role related to the borrowing of funds for spending on pertinent issues like public works. In turn, the deficit spending would be utilized in job creation that eventually increases purchasing power. In addition, Keynes argued that attempts at balancing the budget by the government during a slump would only make situations worse rather than better Arnon, Arie, Weinblatt, and Warren, 23). This was in reference to the Great Depression that occurred between 1929 and 1932. Keynes noted that owing the contraction of economies, governments adjusted by setting up budget deficits through cutting spending and raising taxes. Consequently, he formulated the General Theory in 1936. The theory attempted to explain why recovery was increasingly feeble. To this end, he theorised that in the advent of a major shock, in most cases a drastic drop in investment, there existed no automatic recovery systems in a market economy. Furthermore, the economy would witness a increase in shrinking until it attained a measure of low stability. Keynes termed this phenomenon as “under-employment equilibrium” (Keynes, 35). The reason advanced for this phenomenon was that the capacity of activity, employment and output, was dependent on the aggregate level of spending power or demand. This meant that if spending power decreased, output would equally decrease. Consequently, in such a scenario it was the duty of the government to increase its own spending that would eventually offset the decrease in public spending. Hence, Keynes asserted that cutting of government spending was totally wrong in the event of an economic slump. On the other hand, during an economic boom, the right policy at the Treasury is a hair shirt. To this end, Keynes’s point of view created the foundation for macroeconomics which provided a holistic view on government use of deficits, fiscal policy, tax and spending. Moreover, Keynes asserted that such economic tools could be applied in the management of aggregate demand and consequently guaranteed full employment. Friedrich Hayek challenged Keynes economic views. As opposed to Keynes, Hayek was of the opinion that long term recovery from a post-boom crash extended beyond the need for adequate spending. In addition, it called for resumption to sustainable production era distortions due to easy money. To this end, it is critical to note that Hayek was negatively referred to as someone out to liquidate, farmers, labour, stocks and so on. Furthermore, Hayek believed that the primary cause of economic slumps was excessive credit generated by the banks which ultimately led to overspending. Consequently, the slump represented the reality while the boom was majorly an illusion. Hayek equally contradicted Keynes economic views by placing blame on the central planning mechanisms. To this end, he noted that there lacked a mechanism of economic calculation which would influence rationality in decision making when deciding on where to put place resources or purchase a good from somewhere. This was due to a lack of a pricing system capable of weighing alternatives. Consequently, central planners were capable of making technical decision but incompetent at economic decisions. Moreover, Hayek believed that minimal intervention by the government translated to increased economic freedom. Consequently, when people are in a capacity to choose freely, the economy functions more efficiently. It is critical to note that this differs from Keynes intervention which prescribed for intervention from the government. On the issue of monetary policy, Hayek is in total opposition to it since he believed that its implementation is what results to boom-bust cycle in the first place (Birner and Jack, 45). In contrast, Keynes was of the opinion that monetary policy performs a minor role in stimulating aggregate demand and the economy. Consequently, Keynes notion suggested that the solution lay in government spending. On the matter of fiscal policy, Hayek was in opposition of such an intervention in economic recession. To this end, he believed that fiscal policy would interfere and interrupt the market process. On the other hand, Keynes believed that fiscal policy would assist in the recovery process following a recession. This could be attained through stimulus packages by the government which would pull up the economy (Wapshott, 25). In general, the economic perceptions of Fredrich von Hayek and Maynard Keynes have defined the U.S economy after World War 2. In the period of 1950s-to 1970s, Keynes theory of the government as the dominant actor in the economy was significantly popular (White, 67). Most of the interventions undertaken by the American government in stimulating the economy have been aligned towards Keynesian economics. This has been evident through the stimulus packages passed by the Congress that eventually leads to inflation of money supply by the Central bank. However, Hayek’s economic suggest that such stimulus packages and inflation lay the ground for the next bust. In the period after the 1970’s, Hayek’s theory that the government should have a minimal participation in the economy has gained acceptance. In conclusion, it is important to note that both Hayek and Keynes economics represented the ends of the continuum. Furthermore, in practice, even a highly market oriented society exhibits an mixed economy in which the government has a minor but substantial role. References Arnon, Arie, J. Weinblatt, and Warren Young. Perspectives on keynesian economics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011. Print. Birner, Jack. F.A. Hayek as a political economist: economic analysis and values. London: Routledge, 2002. Print. Keynes, John Maynard. The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1997. Print. Wapshott, Nicholas. Keynes Hayek: the clash that defined modern economics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2011. Print. White, Lawrence H.. The clash of economic ideas: the great policy debates and experiments of the last hundred years. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1471030-john-maynard-keynes-vs-friedrich-hayek
(John Maynard Keynes Vs Friedrich Hayek Research Paper)
https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1471030-john-maynard-keynes-vs-friedrich-hayek.
“John Maynard Keynes Vs Friedrich Hayek Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1471030-john-maynard-keynes-vs-friedrich-hayek.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek

John Miltons Concept of God in Paradise Lost

However, Milton understood that the ways of God were manifold and not necessarily understandable to his creations. Therefore, it should not be surprising that while his concept of God as expressed in this epic demonstrates a god who is both reasonable and just, He is also seen as paradoxical, often expecting what should not reasonably be expected. In addition to presenting his readers with his image of a good yet contradictory God, Milton carefully outlines his concept of the importance of Free Will as opposed to the concept of predetermination.

Milton begins painting his image of God as all powerful and all reasonable with the first book, as Satan talks with his companion about the fall they have experienced together....
9 Pages(2250 words)Book Report/Review

Symbolic vs. Functional Recruitment: Wendys

There is social inequality in India, a difference like lack of teamwork, managers like working individually unlike the Americans, the Indians give priority to culture and family over work while for the Americans work takes precedence. Both are risk-takers and developing personal relations is important for the American while it isn’t for the Indians. Such differences can make it difficult for them to work together.
The next part of the report focuses on expatriation and repatriation. The national culture might make it difficult for the expatriates to adjust unless laws and regulations are established to initiate an effort to encourage better-coordinated work between the two. The expatriates might feel insecure about thei...
16 Pages(4000 words)Assignment

America Vs Let America be America

His poem “Let America be America”
When Claude McKay was just twenty years old, he published his first book of verses titled “Songs of Jamaica” which dealt with his impressions of Black life in America. He wrote on various subjects that included love and romance using very passionate language. Later on, the main themes he wrote on, time and again was about the sufferings and injustice meted out to the blacks in America. In the earlier part of the twentieth century, his literary achievements had a great influence on the Harlem Renaissance. He was greatly respected by the younger generation
Langston Hughes completed his college education at Lincoln University, Pennsylvania. It was at Lincoln, Illinoi...
7 Pages(1750 words)Book Report/Review

The Philosophy and Theories of John Locke

The ‘state of nature’ according to social contract theory describes the hypothetical condition of humanity before the state’s foundation and its monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force (Wikipedia). The 17th and 18th-century thinkers believed that whatever good things one had in the ‘state of nature’ should not be lost when one entered into society. They even evaluated the government based on this condition. The citizens of New Orleans like everyone else had been living in the ‘state of nature’ and hence their sentiments and revolt against the government is natural when their expectations have not been met. Locke believed that in the state of nature, men mostly kept their promises....
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper

John Lockes View of Ownership in Context with the Mabo v Queensland

According to Ian Harris, Locke’s idea of justice simply suggests that the conformity between action & the rule of propriety should be understood in the sense of ‘a right to anything’ (Harris, 2000, p. 49). That means human rights must be restored in society, and when it comes to property, it can be examined in context with ‘abundance’. The more abundant is the property, the more usage of it can be met. However, the ‘abundance’ factor cannot be fulfilled in today’s economic conditions. Chapter V of the Second Treatise defines ‘property’ as land according to Locke and can be examined in two different ways. First, that land, property or external objects that are owned by...
7 Pages(1750 words)Term Paper

Black Like Me by John Howard Griffin

However, Robert Merton tried to divert the focus of structural functionalists to social functions rather than on individual motives. He developed the idea of dysfunction or, an adverse effect on the ability of the parts of a social system to function. Unlike structural functionalists who focus on the cohesion caused by shared societal values, “conflict theorists emphasize the role of power in maintaining order in society (Ritzer 87). They see the importance of raw hate, violence, crudity, and inhumanity that the Negroes/black Americans experienced from the whites in establishing order and change in society.
Symbolic interactionists, on the other hand, focus “on interaction (as well as action and people as agents)...
12 Pages(3000 words)Article

Cultural Value Orientations: German vs. Turkish

When organizational culture is discussed in the context of national culture, it is based on certain assumptions. According to Schein (2004 qt. Browaeys and Price 2008) culture can be defined as:

"...a set of basic assumptions - shared solutions to universal problems of external adaptation (how to survive) and internal integration (how to stay together) - which have evolved over time and are handed down from one generation to the next".

External adaptation here refers to factors or culture which the management can control while internal integration means the relationship which binds them to the group. In this context management styles and approaches are often influenced by the cultural value orientation - that...
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study

The British Constitution vs The Human Rights Act 1998

This research essay analyses the above statement and arrives at a conclusion.
Integration of the provisions of ECHR into U.K’s domestic law by way of HRA 1998 can be regarded as revolutionary as it facilitates the majority of the ECHR rights provisions directly applicable in the U.K. Before that integration, a U.K Court has to presume that when there is a clash between U.K’s domestic law and ECHR rights provision, the ECHR rights provision will always prevail. This principle has been laid down in R v Secretary of Home Dept ex parte Brind1 and R v Secretary of Home Dept ex parte Thakrar. 2
Courts have now the power to declare any statue which they find incompatible with ECHR provisions and order for fine-tunin...
9 Pages(2250 words)Case Study

Analysis of John Locke and Jeremy Bentham Phylosophy

John Locke spent six years there before he went on to Oxford in 1652 where he studied Logic, Metaphysics and Classical Languages. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1956 and continued in Oxford where he was successful in achieving his Master of Arts degree in 1658. It was after receiving this degree that he decided to study medicine and he came under the influence of renowned physician Thomas Sydenham. Locke later assumed the position of personal physician to Lord Ashley, who was known as one of the richest men in England at that time, and also Earl of Shaftesbury.

Locke's presence at Ashley’s home was more than that of a physician. After Lord Ashley became Earl of Shaftesbury and declared Lord Chancellor,...
9 Pages(2250 words)Term Paper

John Rawls vs Robert Nozick: Social Justice

It is logical to look at political philosophy within the framework of history and ethics emerging from it. As could be observed, the question of justice, and how we perceive its nature has remained the prime concern throughout history. This will include, among other things, the existence of specific obligations towards each other and towards the state, the existence of natural rights, claims of property/liberty and equality.

In face of this, the Anglo-American political philosophy has seen famous philosophers like John Rowels, Robert Nozick and recently Amritya Sen to focus on issues and arguments concerning the above...(political Philosophy, 2005 pp1)

As political philosophy is about politics mainly, it s...

6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek for FREE!

Contact Us