John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Name Professor Course Date John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek Since the end of World War 2, the fundamental and conflicting ideals pertaining to economic freedom between Friedrich von Hayek and John Maynard Keynes have engulfed the economic landscape for a long time…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.9% of users find it useful
John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek"

John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek Since the end of World War 2, the fundamental and conflicting ideals pertaining toeconomic freedom between Friedrich von Hayek and John Maynard Keynes have engulfed the economic landscape for a long time. Evidently, both of these renowned economists advanced different perspectives concerning economic freedom pertaining to markets, monetary policy, and fiscal policy. It is important to note that both economists believed the effect of economic ideas on public policy was enormous. In the period after Word War 2, there was a pertinent economic question that sought to examine the right role that government should play in the economy. According to Keynes, the governments’ role related to the borrowing of funds for spending on pertinent issues like public works. In turn, the deficit spending would be utilized in job creation that eventually increases purchasing power. In addition, Keynes argued that attempts at balancing the budget by the government during a slump would only make situations worse rather than better Arnon, Arie, Weinblatt, and Warren, 23). This was in reference to the Great Depression that occurred between 1929 and 1932. Keynes noted that owing the contraction of economies, governments adjusted by setting up budget deficits through cutting spending and raising taxes. Consequently, he formulated the General Theory in 1936. The theory attempted to explain why recovery was increasingly feeble. To this end, he theorised that in the advent of a major shock, in most cases a drastic drop in investment, there existed no automatic recovery systems in a market economy. Furthermore, the economy would witness a increase in shrinking until it attained a measure of low stability. Keynes termed this phenomenon as “under-employment equilibrium” (Keynes, 35). The reason advanced for this phenomenon was that the capacity of activity, employment and output, was dependent on the aggregate level of spending power or demand. This meant that if spending power decreased, output would equally decrease. Consequently, in such a scenario it was the duty of the government to increase its own spending that would eventually offset the decrease in public spending. Hence, Keynes asserted that cutting of government spending was totally wrong in the event of an economic slump. On the other hand, during an economic boom, the right policy at the Treasury is a hair shirt. To this end, Keynes’s point of view created the foundation for macroeconomics which provided a holistic view on government use of deficits, fiscal policy, tax and spending. Moreover, Keynes asserted that such economic tools could be applied in the management of aggregate demand and consequently guaranteed full employment. Friedrich Hayek challenged Keynes economic views. As opposed to Keynes, Hayek was of the opinion that long term recovery from a post-boom crash extended beyond the need for adequate spending. In addition, it called for resumption to sustainable production era distortions due to easy money. To this end, it is critical to note that Hayek was negatively referred to as someone out to liquidate, farmers, labour, stocks and so on. Furthermore, Hayek believed that the primary cause of economic slumps was excessive credit generated by the banks which ultimately led to overspending. Consequently, the slump represented the reality while the boom was majorly an illusion. Hayek equally contradicted Keynes economic views by placing blame on the central planning mechanisms. To this end, he noted that there lacked a mechanism of economic calculation which would influence rationality in decision making when deciding on where to put place resources or purchase a good from somewhere. This was due to a lack of a pricing system capable of weighing alternatives. Consequently, central planners were capable of making technical decision but incompetent at economic decisions. Moreover, Hayek believed that minimal intervention by the government translated to increased economic freedom. Consequently, when people are in a capacity to choose freely, the economy functions more efficiently. It is critical to note that this differs from Keynes intervention which prescribed for intervention from the government. On the issue of monetary policy, Hayek is in total opposition to it since he believed that its implementation is what results to boom-bust cycle in the first place (Birner and Jack, 45). In contrast, Keynes was of the opinion that monetary policy performs a minor role in stimulating aggregate demand and the economy. Consequently, Keynes notion suggested that the solution lay in government spending. On the matter of fiscal policy, Hayek was in opposition of such an intervention in economic recession. To this end, he believed that fiscal policy would interfere and interrupt the market process. On the other hand, Keynes believed that fiscal policy would assist in the recovery process following a recession. This could be attained through stimulus packages by the government which would pull up the economy (Wapshott, 25). In general, the economic perceptions of Fredrich von Hayek and Maynard Keynes have defined the U.S economy after World War 2. In the period of 1950s-to 1970s, Keynes theory of the government as the dominant actor in the economy was significantly popular (White, 67). Most of the interventions undertaken by the American government in stimulating the economy have been aligned towards Keynesian economics. This has been evident through the stimulus packages passed by the Congress that eventually leads to inflation of money supply by the Central bank. However, Hayek’s economic suggest that such stimulus packages and inflation lay the ground for the next bust. In the period after the 1970’s, Hayek’s theory that the government should have a minimal participation in the economy has gained acceptance. In conclusion, it is important to note that both Hayek and Keynes economics represented the ends of the continuum. Furthermore, in practice, even a highly market oriented society exhibits an mixed economy in which the government has a minor but substantial role. References Arnon, Arie, J. Weinblatt, and Warren Young. Perspectives on keynesian economics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011. Print. Birner, Jack. F.A. Hayek as a political economist: economic analysis and values. London: Routledge, 2002. Print. Keynes, John Maynard. The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1997. Print. Wapshott, Nicholas. Keynes Hayek: the clash that defined modern economics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2011. Print. White, Lawrence H.. The clash of economic ideas: the great policy debates and experiments of the last hundred years. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(John Maynard Keynes Vs Friedrich Hayek Research Paper)
“John Maynard Keynes Vs Friedrich Hayek Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek

To what extent was John Maynard Keynes' principal contribution to political economy a re-conceptualisation of optimal relation

...?To what extent was John Maynard Keynes’ principal contribution to political economy a re-conceptualisation of optimal relationships between the and the market? Introduction There is often an inconsistency on the minds of political scientists between what an author articulates and what his theories turn out to be. This is always an inducement to the mind to go deep in search of more plausible and more believable source of information on which academia can rely on. In most cases and very often, obvious anomalies are merely discarded as miscalculations, leaving the initial elucidation unaffected. This is often the case between Keynesian economists and other reformists’ theories....
20 Pages(5000 words)Essay

John Maynard Keynes

... John Maynard Keynes’ Aggregate Expenditure Model The aggregate expenditure model of John Maynard Keynes concentrates on the correlation between aggregate expenditure and income. Keynes applied the income-expenditure approach to explain that real GDP’s equilibrium level may not signify real GDP’s normal level (Tucker 2008). In the income-expenditure framework, real GDP’s equilibrium level is real GDP’s level that is in agreement with the existing aggregate expenditure level (Tucker 2008). *picture taken from Tucker (2008, p. 224) The above diagram is the income-expenditure model of real GDP’s equilibrium formulated by Keynes. If the existing aggregate expenditure level is not adequate to acquire the whole supplied real GDP, output... ). The...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Professional Development and Differentiated Instruction

4 Pages(1000 words)Speech or Presentation

John Maynard Keynes contribution to macro economics

...? JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES CONTRIBUTION TO MACROECONOMICS Macroeconomics 4/24 Keynes General theory John Maynard Keynes is a very prolific contributor to modern macroeconomics. He played a very big role in the development of macroeconomics theories that are in use up to date. Keynesian general theory of macroeconomics states that in the short run, economic output is strongly influenced by aggregate demand. Keynes also said that the total economy expenditure is not a reflection of its productivity. Keynes states that in order for aggregate supply to meet aggregate demand, the goods supplied...
8 Pages(2000 words)Term Paper

John M. Keynes

...? John Maynard Keynes: The Relevance of His Economic Theories Details: al Affiliation: Submission John Maynard Keynes: The Relevance of His Economic Theories John Maynard Keynes, a man of towering intellect with a capability of moving an entire generation towards an economic thought, was, without a doubt, a gravitating influential figure whose efforts have, though not entirely, enabled a democratic, flourishing civil world. Coming from a background with a hard academic excellence coupled with a solid experience of a working economy spanning from the Kings College to Cambridge University...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

John Maynard Keynes

...Lecturer: "Ideas shape the of history." John Maynard Keynes Introduction Historians often that if a nation does not know where it has come from then it will be unable to plan effectively for where it will go in the future. However, for the economic history of the USA, unlike many other nations across the globe, its history took place entirely in the time of modern capitalism. A key player in the 20th century economic history of North America is John Maynard Keynes. John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) was a British economist who is renowned in the present and is considered to be one...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

The advancement of medical research

83 Pages(20750 words)Dissertation

Adam Smith & John Maynard Keynes

...Adam Smith & John Maynard Keynes. Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes are great economists. Their economic theories did not have much in common, however, no one can deny the impressive influence Smith and Keynes had on the policies of their times and even on the theoretical positions of their most vocal opponents. What is more, John Maynard Keynes and Adam Smith offered more than economic theory; they proposed policy solutions to the existing economic problems. These solutions were developed in order to improve macroeconomic performance and national prosperity. As Wesley Mitchell put it, Smith sought to convince people that "the wealth of a nation would be promoted with vastly greater effectiveness by the ‘obvious and simple system... , or in...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay


... between 1946 and 1981 in the four volumes of John Maynard Keynes: Critical Assessments, while Mark Blaug included another 73 published from 1981 to 1989 in the Keynes volumes of Pioneers of Economics. By contrast, one volume of Pioneers of Economics comprising nine articles suffices for Irving Fisher, Arthur Hadley, Ragnar Frisch, Friedrich Hayek, Allyn Young, and Ugo Mazzola.” (Snowdon & Vane, 1995) Joseph Stiglitz and Bruce Greenwald are two contemporary economists affiliated to the Keynesian school. They support the old Keynesian position that increasing wage and price flexibility may worsen a recession. On the other hand, the new Keynesians would suggest that natural economic processes can exaggerate economic shocks... Assess the...
13 Pages(3250 words)Essay

Brittany maynard

...Brittany Maynard was an American woman with terminal brain cancer, who realized that she no longer could fight this battle with terminal cancer. In her own words, it was a huge decision because from her perspective the remedy was to pull the plug. From my understanding, I felt that it was the ethical thing to get the right treatment. On the contrary, there are some moral implications of understanding the issues that are revolved in providing life to someone who does not want to live in vegetative state or with a disability. It is clear that most people are not in touch with disabled individuals, which gives them a false sense of living with disability. This itself becomes a testament to the fear of not complete living... , which is what...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic John Maynard Keynes vs Friedrich Hayek for FREE!

Contact Us