This paper "The Moral and Economic Implications of the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Movement"ar gues that the movement was an attack against extreme forms of capitalism that marginalize the poor and concentrate the wealth of the world in the hands of a select few. …
Download file to see previous pages...
It raised questions about the humanity of the people at the helm of affairs and also questioned the political will of the nation’s system of governance whereby the sincerity of the nation’s political establishment in creating a certain amount of parity within the population is rendered suspect. There are other aspects of this movement and the government’s response that need to be looked into. Apart from not offering any tax sops to the common man and talks of doing away with tax-cuts that were offered during the Bush-era, the government had fuelled the anger of the common man. The brutalities that were carried out upon the protestors by the police came out in the open only due to the work of independent cameramen who were not associated with any news agency. The incidents that occurred during the movement thus bring to light the role of the media as well in the success or failure of such movements. The movement is described by itself as being the result of a series of movements that supports democracy. These, the movement claims, includes the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt where the common man protested against the marginalization of a majority of the population for the purpose of the welfare of the minority that constituted the ruling elite (Occupy Wall Street: The Revolution Continues Worldwide, n.d.). Having this as a moral backing definitely provides a cushion for the movement in terms of the support that it would be able to gather at an international level. There is thus an element of diplomatic support that the supporters of the movement expected to get through their efforts for an equitable society in which everybody would be provided with equal opportunities. In the absence of this, people would live lives whereby their work would be used for the benefit of others and not themselves. Apart from the moral degeneracy of this position, there is also the fact of its unsustainability from an economic point of view that needs to be looked into. The creativity that is necessary for a happy nation and society and a robust economy would be lacking in case the demands that were raised by the movement are ignored. The brutalities that were practiced for the quelling of the revolution also point to the development of a state which brooks no dissent, thus stunting the intellectual growth of the nation and also constructive thought that may lead to a better way of managing the economy. If one looks at these problems from a utilitarian perspective, one would feel that the movement and the rationale behind it need to be lauded. The principle that the movement fought for, a good life for the majority of the citizens of the country, is similar to what the Utilitarian philosophers of the Victorian age proposed. They sought a political system that would make the majority of the people within a society happy. This would be possible in an equitable society where people receive equal opportunities to make their lives better. The movement thus almost seems to be driven by a utilitarian philosophy which would lead to the happiness of the masses and not just the ruling elite. This points to a sad situation where there is a great disjunction between the two.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“The Moral and Economic Implications of the Occupy Wall Street Movement Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1455270-2011-occupy-wall-street-movement
(The Moral and Economic Implications of the Occupy Wall Street Movement Research Paper)
“The Moral and Economic Implications of the Occupy Wall Street Movement Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/macro-microeconomics/1455270-2011-occupy-wall-street-movement.
The protests and public discussions of OWS were centered on the flawed policy priorities of the body politic. It also addressed the greed-based actions of Corporate America which put profits ahead of social responsibility. The failures of the political and business establishments hurt a majority of ordinary Americans – the other 99%, as the slogan proclaims.
Fantasy theme analysis is based upon the theory of symbolic convergence, which has two major assumptions: reality is created through communication and individual interpretations of symbols can converge and create a shared reality for those involved. This happens in a social context in which individual worlds and interpretations converge, resulting in a shared reality for those involved.
The Occupy Movement is the grievance against the social and the economic inequality, unemployment, democratic rights, poverty, corruption and financial crisis. The movement started in Wall Street and gradually soon spread around the other parts of the world.
The variations between the rich and the poor form the central peak for the “Occupy Wall Street” (OWS). The OWS is a movement for enabling technical support to resistance movements. It began in September 2011 and has spread widely since its inception. Its tenets fight against the socio-economic domination by multinationals, corporations, banks, insurance and large businesses (Vag, 2011).
The campaign of Wall Street initiated in the suburban areas of the US, and then it spread across the whole nation like a bush fire. The basic reason of this unpleasant situation is the lack of righteousness. According to the activists, the fiscal system at the organization is unfair and immoral.
It is as a result of such upheavals that there have been several developments in the world. This is especially in relation to the people who see it that they are fighting for their rights (Wood, 2005). One of the most recent movements, which have gained the spotlight and gained international notice, is the Occupy Wall Street Movement.
Courtesy of media awareness and publication and the globalised nature of the world, Occupy Movement spread to other parts of the world such as the United Kingdom, Canada, Denmark, Australia, Belgium, Czechoslovakia, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Ireland and Malaysia (and other states) and thereby taking on a global mien.
The Tea Party Movement main aim is to pressurize the government to have lower taxes. In addition to this, the government should spend less and reduce the amount of regulation in the market. The Occupy Wall
The movement started by absconding taxes in what they termed as new move to prevent the government’s ability to participate in the oppression of the poor. They felt that despite their loyalties to pay government tax, the government used the money to develop oppressive
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic The Moral and Economic Implications of the Occupy Wall Street Movement for FREE!