Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
The report "Pro-Model Simulation Issues" focuses on building a model of a specific manufacturing system and using the Pro-model software to explain different aspects of the manufacturing system and recommending the most effective and cost-effective production system…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Surname
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
ProModel Simulation
Abstract
There are of six if not eight major areas of operations which includes milling, drilling, turning and machine grinding. Some other areas include assembly, inspection, washing and station for packaging. This paper aimed at building a model of specific manufacturing system and to use the Pro-model software to explain different aspect of the manufacturing system and recommend the most effective and cost effective production system. The results shows cost minimized product and it recommends more use of the simulation process for easy decision making process.
Introduction
Manufacturing Companies produces products in steps and each step in production attract cost which consist of both variable and fixed cost. While fixed cost is constant throughout production period, variable cost can be changed depending on various factors the surrounds the type and nature of production machines involves. There are of six if not eight major areas of operations which includes milling, drilling, turning and machine grinding. Some other areas include assembly, inspection, washing and station for packaging (Harrell et al., p23). These particular functions are being directed as the first to the last part being processed reaching in the last stage.
In all stages, the company aimed at minimizing cost hence cost minimization is very important in production system and that is the aim of any organization. The cost minimization can be reduced either through cost optimization or modeling. Therefore, this paper aimed at carried out cost modelling using Pro-model software to help in developing a system. It will have major functions of production system through carrying out experimental design to collect data and simulate the result (Harrell et al., p173). The results will help in decision making in the production cost. Major components of ProModel software looks like the figure shown below:-
Aims and Objectives
The ProModel optimization usually suites a powerful yet simple to use simulation tool that is capable of modeling all manufacturing systems. It is flexible manufacturing modeling system and it can help in supply chain management. The main aim of this report is to build a model of specific manufacturing system and to use the Pro-model software to explain different aspect of the manufacturing system and recommend the most effective and cost effective production system. The ProModel simulation software is a computer based discrete event which is a simulating modelling package for cost in manufacturing sector.
Model details
The simulation components of manufacturing system include the following aspects:- The first part of the model is arrives at every 30 minutes with starting time at 0. In the second part of the system is reached after every 30 minutes with starting time as 20. While the last part is stating after every 30 minutes with starting time at 40. The major aspect of the model include:-
Turning Triangular (6, 8, 12)
Milling Triangular (15, 20, 25)
Drilling Normal mean =7 STD = 2
Grinding Triangular (9, 13, 16)
Assembly Normal Mean = 5, STD = 1
Inspection Normal Mean = 8 STD = 3
Washing Normal Mean = 4, STD = 1
Packing Normal Mean = 5, STD = 1
The data was fed into the simulation software to help in building the system.
Location
In ProModel, locations are describes as fixed places within the systems and they include items like machines system, queues, areas of the storage, work stations among other items. In modeling, location here may include single unit, or multiple location like in this case, we are working with multiple locations.
Results of simulation process.
The first round of experiment results is shown in the table below:-
Type I
Type III
Type II
Avg Parts
0
0
0
0
62
0
69
69
73
70.33333333
5
70
73
71
71.33333333
15
72
74
71
72.33333333
25
73
73
71
72.33333333
50
73
77
73
74.33333333
75
74
76
71
73.66666667
100
75
76
70
73.66666667
120
76
75
73
74.66666667
150
73
77
75
75
170
70
74
78
74
200
71
75
78
74.66666667
250
72
71
76
73
300
74
70
70
71.33333333
350
72
74
76
74
400
71
74
76
73.66666667
450
71
74
75
73.33333333
500
72
74
74
73.33333333
550
72
76
71
73
600
75
75
71
73.66666667
650
72
74
70
72
700
73
75
72
73.33333333
750
73
75
77
75
800
76
73
73
74
850
74
71
67
70.66666667
900
73
76
73
74
950
73
75
71
73
1000
76
77
71
74.66666667
The replica of the experiment
Replications
Type I
Type III
Type II WAC
Avg Parts
0
0
0
0
0
1
69
69
73
70.33333333
2
71
70
73
71.33333333
3
71
70.67
72
71.22333333
4
71
71.5
71.75
71.41666667
5
70.2
70.4
71.8
70.8
10
70.8
70.6
72
71.13333333
15
71.07
71.2
71.87
71.38
20
71
71.15
71.9
71.35
25
71.24
71.48
71.64
71.45333333
30
71.43
71.6
71.67
71.56666667
35
71.34
71.6
71.74
71.56
40
71.48
71.63
71.7
71.60333333
45
71.6
71.62
71.69
71.63666667
50
71.52
71.54
71.74
71.6
60
71.57
71.52
71.68
71.59
70
71.74
71.44
71.69
71.62333333
80
71.75
71.59
71.59
71.64333333
90
71.8
71.64
71.56
71.66666667
100
71.77
71.52
71.47
71.58666667
The experiment was carried out as per the instruction using ProModel program and the results are recorded in the table below:-
Type I 25:- 0 374.2
Type II 28:- 0 206.98
Type III 13:- 0 182.77
The results further reveals that the idle percentage of transport is 54.44% while the semi-skilled is 31.63%. The T full 7, and can be 52.10%. Turning blocked by 0.57%. In this simulation, we mostly used the costing features which can help in decision making on the system based on the cost basis. We are able to monitor the costs associated with every location, entities and resource during a model run. The costing statistics will be produced in this case which will be useful in decision making process.
Discussion and Conclusion
After the three experiments, the results were graphs to explain the movement of the units against warm up time. The graph below explains the movement.
It is important to notice that from the result is that the average parts of the units starts at 60 units while the time is still 0. This shows that time is not the issue but the unit cost which needs to be minimized. The other location modeling results is shown in the table below:
Results: Locations
Name
Scheduled Time (HR)
Capacity
Total Entries
Avg Time Per Entry (MIN)
Avg Contents
Maximum Contents
Current Contents
% Utilization
Door
2
1
60.03
0.01
0.01
1.00
0.03
0.63
Desk
2
3
24.53
3.84
0.78
2.93
1.10
26.14
DriveThru Line
2
3
23.37
2.07
0.44
2.47
0.43
14.80
DriveThru Window
2
1
23.57
3.00
0.59
1.00
0.70
59.23
The section scenario is through simulation of units against the replica and investigating how the curve moves. The movement of the curve is shown in the table graph below:-
Against the replica or the replication it starts at zero showing steep movement of the graph before it flattens at 70. The movement of the graph show how the cost can be reduced in this modeling process of the manufacturing system. This can also be transposed to single capacity and in the process the results below will be produced.
Conclusion
From the results, quantitative analysis is based on the combined optimization and simulation modeling which indicates that by increasing the volume of materials and increasing the machine hours, we are able to reduce cost by 11.14%. Location and time of material delivery is also very important in this case as they help in measuring performance and cost effectiveness of the production process.
Limitation of the model
The model is complicated to use and require skilled personnel who are able to interpret the data and use the software in computing the cost reduction in an organization. This is very critical in cost management process and implies that if a skilled personnel is not present the company may not be in a position to use the software.
Alternatives
There are several alternatives which can be used in decision making process. One of them is to use other cost management tools like excel optimization software which are simple and easy to use. However, ProModel simulation programs gives quicker results compared to other models.
Recommendation
Until recently, manufacturing companies have not benefited fully from the simulation in improving the decision processes in their organization. The ProModel has been designed specifically to help in improving the decision process and this study recommends the use of Mixed Integer Program (MIP) in modeling the process and ProModel has they are tailored made for manufacturing system decision making process.
Work Cited
Harrell, Charles, Biman K. Ghosh, and Royce O. Bowden. Simulation using promodel. Boston: McGraw-Hil, 2011.
Read
More
Share:
sponsored ads
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the report on your topic
"Pro-Model Simulation Issues"
with a personal 20% discount.