American Women's Literature of the 19th Century - Term Paper Example

American Women’s Literature American Women’s Literature American women have always been the center of discussion for the past two centuries even in American writing. There are several primary reasons attached to it. The first being their lifestyle and the way they used to dress up. Americans as we all know have been famous for creating trends with the help of their dressing and styling. Similarly, the case of American women is also unique and has been discussed with the help of literature. This report is a discussion about the life of American women in the 19th Century with the help of all the supported documents available. The American Women in the 19th Century When it comes to the discussion of American women, let us look back into the history and start with the nineteenth century literature. Toni Morrison is a famous writer who has written on the topic of American Literature related to that of women. Morrison also has generalized the concept of women in a worldly manner. She belonged to a simple family and grew up in a small rural town that had been exposed to the realities of the world such as racism and murder and therefore gave us a clear idea about the culture of African-American women. To further delve into the topic, she also learned the folklore and the music of African American culture (Donaghy) (Showalter, Baechler and Litz). European and American women in the nineteenth century existed during a time described by gender disparity. Toward the start of the century, women were eligible for few of the legitimate, social, or political rights that are presently take for granted in western nations: they couldnt vote, couldnt sue or be sued, couldnt affirm in court, had “amazingly” forced control over individual property after marriage, were seldom conceded lawful authority of their kids in instances of separation, and were banished from foundations of advanced education (Andrews, Foster and Harris 39). Women relied upon staying obedient to their fathers and spouses. They were also restricted to take important decisions in the family. According to Gilbert and Gubar, young women for the most part stayed home, take care of their children and run the family unit. Lower-class women frequently did work outside the home, yet more often than not women were paid local servants or workers in production lines and factories (107). The onset of industrialization, urbanization, and in addition the development of the business sector economy, the white collar class changed European and American social orders and family life. For the majority of the eighteenth century through the initial couple of years of the nineteenth century, families cooperated, separating cultivating obligations or work in little scale family-possessed organizations to help themselves (Showalter). With the quick commercial development, huge business, and relocation of bigger urban communities after 1830, then again, the family home as the focal point of monetary creation was a step by step replaced with laborers who earned their living outside the home (James, James and Boyer). Most researchers concur that the Victorian Age was a period of heightening gender polarization as women were relied upon to stick to a pitiless characterized circle of local and good obligations, limitations that women progressively opposed in the last two-thirds of the century (Habegger). Academic examination of nineteenth-century women has included examination of gender roles and safety on either side of the Atlantic, regularly, concentrating on contrasts and similitudes between the lives of women in the United States, England, and France. While the dominant part of these studies have focused on how white, working class women responded to their allotted household or private circle in the nineteenth century, there has additionally been enthusiasm toward the motion of gender parts and societal desires in minority and lower-class groups. Despite the fact that these studies can be correlated, Hart and Leininger additionally highlight the trouble of making speculations about the lives of women from distinctive social, racial, financial, and religious foundations in a century of unfaltering change (104). Where speculations can be made, notwithstanding, "the woman question," as it was brought in civil arguments of the time, has been seen as an issue to portray the part of women in her private home life. Frequently, portrayals of the lives of nineteenth-century women, whether European or American, rich or poor, is depicted in negative terms, focusing on their constrained range of prominence contrasted with that of men from comparative foundations (Walker). Nonetheless, the private circle of nineteenth-century women had seemingly more positive pictures, characterizing women as the more ethically refined of the two genders and in this manner the watchman of profound quality and social union. Women had the capacity to utilize this more positive picture as an issue for requesting access to open doors, for a long time ago denied to them by openly underscoring and attesting the requirement for and profits of a more "socialized" and "cultured" impact in legislative issues, craftsmanship, and training (Ugalde). The same societal changes that were generally in charge of womens status being characterized regarding family life and profound quality likewise attempted to incite gender difference and change as they were considered inexperienced and not good in critical decision making and therefore could not match themselves with the men in the society. Women on both sides of the Atlantic, including Charlotte Brontë, Sarah Josepha Hale, Elizabeth Gaskell, George Eliot and Frances Power Cobbe, all communicated about the sexism and hence this was one of the major reasons behind their dismissal in spite of being one of the best writers of the century. Through their books, letters, papers, articles, flyers, and talks, these and other nineteenth-century women depicted the regularly clashing desires forced on them by society. These women, alongside others, communicated notions of endless women who were not able to talk, and brought consideration and backing to their worries (Kellogg). Current basic examinations frequently concentrate on the strategies utilized by women to develop their reason while as of now, keeping up their fragile difference of legitimacy and the ladylike request by not "undermining" men, or the family unit (MacLean and Bose). The mid-nineteenth-century young lady invested the majority of her time in the company of women. Specifically, working class young ladies invested time with their moms, sisters and any female servant or babysitter that may have existed with them. Their center experience was that of a female group in which home life and their future residential part were the center of discussion. There was almost no communication with young men, as frequently young ladies were instructed in single-sex schools and their siblings were swayed to standardize with different young men and play outside. Young ladies were seen as physically substandard and excessively fragile to play the way that young men did and were urged to play inside, consequently sending an unobtrusive message that their circle was inside the home. Young ladies likewise normally had little connection with their fathers. From the center to late nineteenth century, an expansive rate of men was included in the Civil War and were far from home (Parker and Cole). As indicated by Theriot and Theriot Girls were offered next to zero backing from any male figures and it has been set that "a piece of the message young people were given was that the genders were so not the same as one another that correspondence and shared comprehension were uncommon among women and men." (14) indeed, in the late nineteenth century, there were not very many men as an issue of the mass setbacks from the war however it kept going just four years. The condition of war and women being left to watch over the family made the female group significantly all the more hard weave, especially even with damage and passing of male family figures, both fathers and senior children. Hence young ladies were likewise given a heftier obligation regarding nurturing more youthful kin and assuming control over their mothers tasks, empowering her thus to tackle all the obligations of the missing or involved father or child. Regularly the message sent to a daughter by her mother was that of selflessness and the importance of familial obligation notwithstanding difficulty. The household obligations, nonetheless, were not all that overwhelming that young ladies did not have room schedule-wise to play. Indeed, much of their local preparing was at play. Young ladies figured out how to cook by cooking little suppers for themselves, their mates and their dolls. Their dolls, all by themselves, were models for adapting great tyke raising and consideration taking aptitudes. By and large, most young ladies tackled a huge part of the family obligations. A few moms gave their daughters few genuine family errands with the goal that they may have a period in their lives in which they were merry. "As indicated by mid-century onlookers and late-century women who made up the daughters era, the female, immature way of life was described by a certain instructive experience, a lot of relaxation time for perusing, gatherings, and courting, and the nonattendance of household obligations. This moderately unimportant youth can be seen as an issues last blessing to her daughter, a blessing for which the mother yielded." However, this was genuinely bizarre. In many family units, the commitments of the children were essential, yet despite the fact that the young ladies utilized play as an issue of learning household assignments, they were still relying on to help the family unit especially regarding finishing residential tasks. Young ladies commitment to the house was critical, yet their lives were not by any stretch of the imagination made up of household obligation. It was really very basic for young ladies to be too instructed as their siblings and to be fulfilled in what was viewed as more proper abilities, for example, music and workmanship too. For the lower and working classes, normal or government funded schools were accessible (despite the fact that not yet obligatory) and additionally little non-public schools. Young ladies were regularly instructed from the age of six to the age of fourteen or fifteen. Towards the end of the nineteenth century, advanced education was likewise accessible, however meagerly gone to. The most well-known sort of school to which white collar class young ladies went was a little, private, single-sex school run by a solitary lady or man. A few young ladies went to school for a year and after that got to be educators; nonetheless, it was normal that after a year or two of instructing, a young lady would then get married and resign from educating. Regularly the instructors were very little more seasoned than the understudies they taught. A fourteen-year-old understudy may effortlessly have a sixteen-year-old educator. By the late nineteenth century, training itself had turned into a female occupation in which the women who had been beforehand thought cannily second rate and unnecessary to instruct were instructing the young men and youngsters who were relied upon to turn into the future intellectuals and pioneers of the group. The course of study for young ladies was shockingly thorough. In spite of the fact that young ladies were not supported as intensely as young men were, the educational program was generally as trying. In the journal of a ten-year old young lady living in 1849 the principles of her school were recorded, and it was unequivocally affirmed that all youngsters were required to be prompt and flawless and to not fall flat in any lessons (Havens). In perusing the journal of this ten-year old young lady, one can see in her written work the unrivaled instruction she had gotten. The quality and accuracy of her written work would be viewed as astounding for a ten-year-old of today. Another author of that time utilized a physiological contention as a part of an article entitled "Control of Children in School" printed in The Mothers Assistant in 1845. The essayist felt that children ought not be "restricted" in school for more than four hours on the grounds that "youthful children cant keep up a reason quite a while, nor an exertion quite a while, without exhaustion for their muscles oblige more continuous variations than those of grownups." As it was, moms couldnt manage the cost of their children, especially their daughters, returning tired since they were required to proceed with their local instruction on finishing of their regular training. For mothers, the residential training needed to outweigh everything else, so that their daughter could be relevantly arranged for their unavoidable future as an issue and mother. Prior to the nineteenth century, relational unions were organized focused around financial need and parental decision, particularly in center and high society New England. The nineteenth century introduced another age in which companionate marriage, or organization focused around adoration and appreciation, turned into the standard. Obviously, the man was required to propose and the lady was relied upon to acknowledge. The womens restricted part in this course of action was mourned by one young person who clarified, "genuine we have the freedom of declining those we dislike, yet not of selecting those we do." Although there were no more masterminded relational unions as a general rule marriage remained a financial game plan with unmistakably characterized parts for both men and women (Wayne). The man was the provider and the lady was basically a home maker. The discussion highlights the most important aspects of the American Women’s Literature with a generalized discussion, spread across the timeframe of the 19th century. During these times, several changes have incorporated in the American Women and they have been viewed as the trend setter. Works Cited Andrews, William L, Frances Smith Foster, and Trudier Harris. The Oxford Companion To African American Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Print. Donaghy, Daniel. Women And Literature: A Look At Toni Morrison. Oxfordaasc.com. Web. 29 Nov. 2014. Ellet, E. F. The Women Of The American Revolution. New York: Haskell House, 1969. Print. Franklin, V. P. Introduction: African American Student Activism In The 20Th Century. The Journal of African American History 88.2 (2003): 105. Web. Gilbert, Sandra M, and Susan Gubar. The Norton Anthology Of Literature By Women. New York: W.W. Norton, 1985. Print. Habegger, Alfred. Gender, Fantasy, And Realism In American Literature. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982. Print. Hart, James D, and Phillip Leininger. The Oxford Companion To American Literature. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. Print. Havens, Catherine Elizabeth. Diary Of A Little Girl In Old New York. New York: H.C. Brown, 1920. Print. James, Edward T, Janet Wilson James, and Paul S Boyer. Notable American Women, 1607-1950. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971. Print. Kellogg, S. Women In Ancient America; The Women Of Colonial Latin America. Ethnohistory 48.4 (2001): 735-738. Web. MacLean, Alair, and Christine E. Bose. Women In 1900: Gateway To The Political Economy Of The 20Th Century. Contemporary Sociology 31.4 (2002): 419. Web. Mattern, Joanne. Katharine Graham And 20Th Century American Journalism. New York: Parker, Alison M, and Stephanie Cole. Women And The Unstable State In Nineteenth-Century America. College Station: Published for the University of Texas at Arlington by Texas A & M University Press, 2000. Print. Showalter, Elaine, Lea Baechler, and A. Walton Litz. Modern American Women Writers. New York: Scribner, 1991. Print. Showalter, Elaine. Womens Time, Womens Space: Writing The History Of Feminist Criticism. Tulsa Studies in Womens Literature 3.1/2 (1984): 29. Web. Theriot, Nancy M, and Nancy M Theriot. Mothers And Daughters In Nineteenth-Century America. Lexington, Ky.: University Press of Kentucky, 1996. Print. Ugalde, Sharon Keefe. The Feminization Of Female Figures In Spanish Womens Poetry Of The 1980S. Studies in 20th & 21st Century Literature 16.1 (1992): n. pag. Web. Verbrugge, Martha H. Gender, Science & Fitness: Perspectives On Womens Exercise In The United States In The 20Th Century. Health and History 4.1 (2002): 52. Web. Walker, Nancy. American Women Humorists. Tulsa Studies in Womens Literature 1.1 (1982): 87. Web. Wayne, Tiffany K. Womens Roles In Nineteenth-Century America. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 2007. Print. Read More