William Shakespeare's Hamlet Literature Based report - Research Paper Example

c. He acknowledges that too much thinking is a sign of cowardice. But the irony is that a coward never thinks too much. A considerate and brave man who wants thinks much about the possibility of committing a foul. The soliloquies in “Hamlet” play a great role in working out this indecisive nature of Hamlet in the play. The aforementioned soliloquies of Hamlet reveal a great deal of Hamlet’s indecisive but noble mind. In this soliloquy, it is evident that Hamlet suffers much from the internal agony and conflict.

Hamlet is neither brave nor cowardly. Rather he is a noble and considerate man who thinks much about the consequence of his action. He wants to be sure that he does not commit any injustice to the main suspect, Claudius. So, he delays the revenge in order to sure of that Claudius is truly the murderer. Still an astute reader can put his action into question. Hamlet stages the play of Gonzales to catch the conscience of Claudius. It is not clear why he delays the revenge, even though by staging this play he gets clear proofs of Claudius’s guilt.

A deep analysis of Hamlet’s psychology will necessarily reveal that delaying the revenge is essentially the outcomes of his excessively thoughtful nature. After the play of Gonzales, Hamlet gets a chance to kill Claudius who was then praying. But he does not kill him because he thinks that killing Claudius in prayer will send him to heaven. Such action reveals that Hamlet is excessively obsessed with the consequences of his actions. His soliloquies also reveal a great deal of his thoughtful indecisive nature.

The monologues of Hamlet expose that he vehemently suffers from an existential inner conflict. His failure to take the revenge snatches away the meaning of life. On the other hand, he cannot decide whether he should take the revenge. In his soliloquies, Hamlet often rebukes himself for his inertia and inability to act promptly. It seems that he is locked within his head.