Critical Legal Thinking - Assignment Example

Critical Legal Thinking In the 7-7 case, where Steven Soderbergh claims approval to sell the defendants’ DVDs in an edited version without their consent, it would not be fair if the court rules in favor of the plaintiff. For every decision made in any field of business, there are six guiding steps, which one ought to follow. Among them is the justification step. In this section, one is able to evaluate whether the business activities that come along with the decision are morally upright. This way, every businessperson is able to scrap any decisions, which might cause trouble between them and their competitors, customers or even the society.

In the filed case, it is vivid enough that this step was ignored when the plaintiff made the decision of editing products from different companies and selling them out without the owner’s consent. This should have been legalized by making an agreement with the original owners of the films before altering and selling them out. Unfortunately, in law, ignorance is never an excuse. As for case 7-8, the answer is yes; a small group of well-organized activists can dictate how a large or major corporation conducts its business affairs.

Every citizen is under the law. Before any court of law, all human beings and groups with the relevant nationality are equal as long as they are governed by the same state laws. This is the explanation as to why the law is generally referred to as the shield of the inferior. It protects those citizens who are viewed as weaker than others are. This condition frequently occurs in business fields. As for the current case, the small group has the ability to dictate the major corporation as long as the arguments presented are justified under the state laws.

Once the small group files suit against the major corporation, it is the duty of the court to see to it that justice is practiced and the claims are fulfilled. Not any other factors, size inclusive, are considered in enforcement of the law. This makes it very easy for such a small group to dictate how affairs of major corporations should run. As a high-level manager for a shoe manufacturer, I would take note of the fact that any decision I make concerning the business is vital and may bring about highly significant results.

Bearing this in mind, I would evaluate keenly the options I have in making specific decisions. To help me in this, I would apply the steps that act as guidance in making good decisions in business. One of the steps states that the decisions should be in terms with the state laws that govern business activities in the specified field. The fact that there have been cases in court related to the risk I am almost engaging in is enough evidence on the importance of practicing legal activities in business.

There are strong laws that defend women even during international business activities. This is proof that messing around with their role in business could put any organization into great trouble. I would hence find better and safer ways of earning more profits other than violating the law.