Research Design And Analysis Week 5 2 - Assignment Example

Research design and analysis Research design and theoretical framework are some of the elements of a scientific research. An may discuss them explicitly, indirectly, or may fail to discuss them in an article. This paper discusses aspects of the two elements in the article, ‘using critical praxis to understand and teach teamwork.’The article is a qualitative study and its corresponding characteristics with features of a qualitative study explain this. One of the features of a qualitative study is the use of words instead of numbers to communicate and interpret results and is evident in the article.

Qualitative studies also focus on development of meaning on a subject matter as opposed to the scope of quantitative research that focuses on identifying and testing existence of causal relationships. The scope of the article however identifies focus on understanding the role of critical praxis in teamwork. Qualitative research is also subjective, depends on people’s opinion and this identifies with the authors’ approach that express their informed opinion on the subject. Use of words, subjectivity, and focus on development of meaning therefore identifies the article as a qualitative article (Seibold & Kang 2008; Gerrish & Lacey, 2013).

The author does not offer a theoretical framework for the study that is exploratory. No discussion therefore exists on a theory or previous application of a theory. The authors also failed to develop research questions for their study. In addition, the authors do not state their study’s dependent and independent variables. The exploratory scope of the study also fails to offer a basis for assuming variables and their relationship (Seibold, 2008).A qualitative approach can be identified with the study but it is silent on theoretical its framework.

Works citedGerrish, K. & Lacey, A. (2013). The research process in nursing. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Seibold, D. & Kang, P. (2008). Using critical praxis to understand and teach teamwork. Business Communication Quarterly, 71(4), 421-438.