Download file to see previous pages...
In America, the constitution governs corrections as it provides the system for administration of the justice. The decision on which classification an offender would be subjected to would be accomplished through use of instruments such as the National Institution of Corrections which undertakes this process on admission of an inmate then six months to one year henceforth. As inmates join the prison system, they would be assessed at the reception or classification facility depending on their crime, escape risk, criminal history, behavioral risk and health needs, generally classified as needs and risks by Voorhis, Braswell, and Lester (140). According to Serin (5), the placement into a specific classification would be prioritized first with security needs, then space availability and finally the needs of the inmate. Women and children would be classified under facilities separate from those of adult males. Prisoners do not have any control over their classification though after serving for some time, they could request to be taken to facilities close to their families.
From the historic times, prisons were designated places to punish and simultaneously rehabilitate offenders, away from the community then later integrate them back to the community. With the expansion in the number of prisons in the US, the need to classify them has arisen. In the correctional system, classification refers to the placement of prisoners in a suitable custody from the various available ones so as to match the needs of the offender with the correctional resources. This classification system aims at differentiating prisoners based on their security risks thus predicting where to place them; be it minimum, medium or maximum custody (Voorhis, Braswell and Lester 140).
The initial idea was to combine maximum and medium security level prisons. Later, supermax prisons were developed with Alarid and Reichel (132) arguing on Alcatraz Prison being the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Offender correctional classification systems Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1609385-offender-correctional-classification-systems
(Offender Correctional Classification Systems Research Paper)
“Offender Correctional Classification Systems Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1609385-offender-correctional-classification-systems.
This is a report on correction management that seeks to identify, analyze and recommend solutions to issues facing the Mermon Correctional Facility. The correctional facility faced a problem in the year 2010 and a number of issues have emerged in relation to the management of the facility.
Even though rape or any kind of sexual assault in correctional facilities is prevented by the 2003 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA), still the cases of sexual offences in correctional facilities are increasing. This paper briefly analyses the rape in correctional facilities and the possible solutions to eliminate sexual assault cases behind the bar.
Most of these people get caught after this crime more than once. The society tends to outcast these offenders from the society. Most of the offenders tend to commit this crime after getting out of jail. The correctional facilities have failed in rectifying these criminals and help them become a part of the society.
Instead, prisons now are more broadly viewed as corrections facilities in order to rehabilitate and modify the behavior of the convicts in preparation for their assimilation back to society, most especially for cases that do not warrant life sentence or death penalty.
The Washington Department of Corrections employs a multi-staged approach that preliminarily focuses on the recognition of the problem, encourages the offender to take responsibility for this action, introduces the offender with means by which they can minimize the risks associated with such behavior, understand the underlying factors that contribute/increase this risk, and ways in which they can work to mitigate such risks in the future (Spencer, 1999).
(Law and Owe, 2006).
a) The deductive approach to accounting classification identifies environmental factors and links them to national accounting practices to propose international classifications, while the inductive approach identifies development partterns, analysis practices and proposes explanations by referring to various factors such as economic, social, political and cutural factors.
the past, offenders who are proven to be mentally ill are ordered to be confined to a mental health institution, nowadays, jails are now being repository for the mentally ill. This is for the simple reason that the keeping offenders in jail instead of in a mental health
Various theories have been developed to classify as well as understand the etiology of the crimes. However, these offenders have multiple variations in terms of their victim selection, their motivation in engaging in
If such offenders remain in the community, they would pose a threat to the community members. Therefore, application of relevant programs that would extend the help they need is necessary.
This category is composed of offenders with
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Offender correctional classification systems for FREE!