Nobody downloaded yet

A Question of Corporate Law - Literature review Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
 This review discusses the foibles of democratic institutions in corporate governance. Here, the writer critically analyzes the following statement: If the majority are abusing their powers and are depriving the minority of their rights, the minority is entitled to maintain their rights. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.9% of users find it useful
A Question of Corporate Law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "A Question of Corporate Law"

Download file to see previous pages To de Tocqueville, that is a burden of democracy. Limitless influence is dangerous because utter control is the origin of oppression. If people are mistreated, the only place to turn is the majority.
  MacDougall v Gardiner clarified the principles of majority rule. If the grievance of a minority is about something to which the majority of the company has the privilege or has done unevenly a meeting may be called, and the majority ultimately gets what it wants. Over the years, the principle of majority rule has become more inclusive, however. We recount some of the more representative policies to make our assessment of the historic nature of the question at hand.
A place to start is the generally accepted structure of corporate membership. Members of a corporation have rights against each other and against the business as outlined the company's charter.3 As such minority shareholders usually accept they cannot command the overall control of the organization and must accept the will of the majority rule. Majority rule can be wicked especially when there is a single controlling shareholder. Many exceptions have developed relative to the broad standard of majority rule. Here are some of the more common:
Where the majority votes to carry out deception against the minority, judges may allow the minority to sue.
Everyone maintains the right to file suit if the majority invades personal rights or, for example, where the company's dealings are not in accordance with the company's foundation.
It is possible for minority shareholders to secede in the name of the business when the company is controlled by the supposed wrongdoers.4
In these matters of rights and ethics, the court is supposed to favor the minority.
Court involvement in corporate voting has been minimized over the years though. Corporate law has focused on progressive minority protection and shareholders action, but a majority cannot force a dissentient minority to do that which is not allowed by the charter.5 It must allow the minority to express their opinions on the matter of the meeting, but the minority cannot irrationally hinder the resolution of the popular vote by filibuster, for example.6 The minority has no right against the majority with respect to actions of which they do not support if the majority is allowed to do them.  This standard applies where something has been done irregularly which the majority is at liberty to do regularly.8 Nevertheless, the minority may still sue when the majority is abusing power and depriving the minority their rights.9 Again, the court favors the majority while bolstering minority power when there is an ethical question.
  ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Corporate law Master Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Corporate law Master Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from
(Corporate Law Master Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Corporate Law Master Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words.
“Corporate Law Master Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF A Question of Corporate Law

Corporate Law Corporate Manslaughter

...than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick, or a tap on the head with a steam hammer. But only just. The new draft bill on corporate manslaughter is a ghost of what was once proposed. But, for the first time in the United Kingdom, there might now be a chance of prosecuting large companies for killing their workers” (2005). Between 1997 and the 2005 adoption, twelve promises were followed by delays, and five thousand people died as Parliament deliberated (Monbiot, 2005). Home Secretary claims that delays were due to complexity of the law are belied by the rapidity which the Prevention of Terrorism Act was pushed through Parliament, which allows conviction prior to a fair trial (Monbiot, 2005). The...
16 Pages(4000 words)Essay

Corporate law

...?Corporate Law Peter and Amanda have been in partnership for many years in the car trade in Kent. They have decided to incorporate their business as a private company limited by shares, called Kent Cars Ltd. As an expert on corporate law you are requested to advise on the matters listed below: (a) What provisions should be included in the article of association to ensure that Peter and Amanda can realise their shareholding in the company if either of them should wish to leave the business (b) To what extent can the company`s financial affairs be kept secret from the public? (c) Assuming the Peter and Amanda are the only directors and shareholders in the company, what...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Law of corporate governance question ( Criminalising corporate governance failures is a step too far. Discuss )

...into positions of absolute compliance. This may be thought of as codifying ethical standards and using them as law. Before the advent of Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2003, corporate officials had acted on the benefits of corporate governance as a means of survival. This reform has a very high price tag and there is no assurance that it will deter corporate governance failure. Therefore and for every reasonable corporate governance scholar, it would seem the best way is to go back to the law and criminalize corporate governance failure. Conclusion There is a variety of practical questions to which answers must be...
18 Pages(4500 words)Essay

Law - Corporate Law

...?Corporate law Task: Currently, Tinky, Lola and Daphne are in a partnership. However, the accomplishment of their entity has necessitated a change in their business’s form to one that provides more legal stability. Presently, the three partners Tinky, Lola and Daphne are responsible for all the incomes and debts of their entity since their business has no legal identity. As such, they will bear responsibility for any matter pertaining to the business1. Tinky, Lola and Daphne wish to expand Platini into a series of restaurants. Converting their current business into a chain of bistro and restaurants will require considerable funding necessitating a better legal basis for the business. The partners wish to bring in more funding... into the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Corporate law

...?Corporate Law Table of Contents Introduction 3 Legal Issues Prevalent to Laws of Directors’ Remuneration 4 The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) 5 Effectiveness of New Regulations of Laws in Meeting Stakeholders’ Interest 7 Conclusion 10 Bibliography 13 Introduction Corporations Act 2001, informally known as Corps Act establishes the law for the purpose of governing the business activities effectively in Australia at both interstate and federal levels. The focus of this law primarily lies on the companies, but still it has coverage over various other business entities like the partnership and other schemes...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Corporate law

...? Corporate Law Corporate law is a branch of the judicial system in the UK that deals with litigation matters they involve business enterprises and entrepreneurship. It governs the relationships that exist between corporations and helps sort out differences that arise between them. Corporate law serves to regulate the activities of businesses that were formed under the Companies Act of 2006, and other previous enactments that remain relevant, in today’s corporate world. This paper aims to discuss the nature of corporate law in UK by highlighting two cases that are going...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Corporate law

... to be presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. The accuser has the hard work to prove the accused is guilty. If the Australian Securities and Investment Commission will sustain this theory and it can be proven by evidence, this would constitute vitiation ( impairing the quality or effectiveness of an act such as to contaminate, spoil, make invalid) of consent which would make the contract voidable ( contract is valid unless it is questioned or objected, then, it is made illegal or void).( Under the corporation law of Australia, the contract is invalid if voidable. A voidable contract may be held valid if there is failure to question the same within the time prescribed by Australian law... of the...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Corporate Law

...Running Head: Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 Critically assess the provisions of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 [Name of the writer] [Name of the institution] Critically assess the provisions f the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 After more than 10 years f delay, consultation and lobbying from campaigners, trade unions and industry, the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 has finally entered the statute book. Its main provisions come into force on 6 April 2008. The war f attrition between the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay


...Corporate Law a) Conditions for redemption of shares at premium Sections 684 to 689 of the Companies Act 2006 (c.46 deal with various issues relating to redemption of shares including the premium payable on such redemptions. The directors of Mirza Plc intend to redeem 10000 redeemable shares of £ 1 face value for a total sum of £ 15000. That is to say the redemption of shares is at a premium of £ 5000. It is pertinent to note that these shares were initially issued at a premium of £ 2500. The other plan of the directors of Mirza Plc is that the redemption of such shares shall be financed by a fresh issue of 5000 shares of £1 each at a premium of £ 0.30 each share. The total value (including premium) of...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Corporate Law

...Corporate Law Table of Contents Introduction 2 A Brief Analysis of the Scenario 3 A Brief Overview of the Remedies 6 Conclusion 10 References 11 Introduction The term, ‘minority shareholders’ is often referred to those shareholders who possess marginal stakes in a particular business company, owning generally less than 50% of the total equity shares, where more than 50% shares are acquired by ‘majority shareholders’. The minority shareholders of a business firm are also considered as the equity holders who do not possess the voting rights as well as market exit options. Moreover, the minority shareholders do not bear any controlling interest upon a company. The minority shareholders possess several...
8 Pages(2000 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Literature review on topic A Question of Corporate Law for FREE!

Contact Us