Court Issues Analysis - Research Paper Example

Future management issues and trends of language interpretation services Let us take the case of ongoing debate regarding victim rights amendment that at some point one could associate with a highly controversial issue of restorative justice. Victim rights amendment technically is a form of restorative justice because it gives substantial importance to the welfare of the victims. However, this must be substantially weighed knowing the fact that wrongful convictions and even executions also exist.

From the prevailing debates concerning restorative justice and victim rights amendment, one could substantially observe how each of the different side of this argument plays with words just to justify their points. In the book of Waller (2009), the current debates in criminal justice are present and everybody exactly playing with words. One of them is the issue concerning restorative justice. Severe punishment may be a significant reason why rehabilitation needs more emphasis in the criminal justice system.

In this case, juvenile justice is highly applicable. There might be a rightful justification in this case. However, it seems there are different interpretations of laws and usage of judicial terms that even would result to specific judgment that at some point may be at the wrong side (Giverlber & Farrell, 2008). Furthermore, needs have become essential justification for the justice system (Aikman, 2008). The concept of these needs might be broader in its sense because it has to be critically considered at which point of view its application is necessary.

However, what is necessary in this case may not be exactly the right thing. In other words, the future of language interpretation services is brighter, and which would enough to cover the essential regarding the right application of court proceedings. Assessment of past, present and future impact that victim rights laws have on court proceedings In the book of Murasking and Roberts (2009) there are different existing trends in the criminal justice system that could possibly surface in the 21st century.

One of them includes expansion of different courses of action and option that victims face in the 21st century. Next is the probable commercialization or market creation for antitheft and personal security devices. Then there is increase of professional advocates for helping victims achieve formal rights within the criminal justice system. Next to this is the possibility of private prosecutors in the event of continuous dissatisfaction on public prosecutors’ services. Then victim-offender-reconciliation programs are at the possibility to proliferate to handle wide variety of case.

Finally, there would be recognition of differential justice as a problem, which is exactly the issue of how criminal justice agencies handled privileged victims and second-class complaints. These are just some of the probable trends that will possibly surface in the US criminal justice system at present and in the future in order to further enhance its efficiency to serve and address the needs of the people. These ideas are mere reflections on the level of the prevailing contentment of the people towards the US criminal justice system from the past and at present.

In other words, the thought that the above details strongly emphasize dynamic changes, then one could substantially evaluate that the US criminal justice system necessarily have to give meaningful emphasis on the