Nobody downloaded yet

Justice Scalia's Fundamental Rights - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
[Author’s Name] [Class] 06 June 2012 Justice Scalia’s Fundamental Rights In one of his recent interviews, Justice Scalia expressed his opinion on the relevance and effectiveness of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in the context of gender and sexual discrimination in the U.S…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.3% of users find it useful
Justice Scalias Fundamental Rights
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Justice Scalia's Fundamental Rights"

Download file to see previous pages Constitution as an instrument to protect the fundamental rights of citizens in America. The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is concerned primarily with the fundamental rights of citizens of the United States. Based on the, 14th Amendment, “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” (Legal Information Institute). Simply put, the 14th Amendment limits the power of Congress and other federal and state powers to discriminate against individuals. The 14th Amendment is the document of equal protection that outlaws individual rights violations. Since the 1970s, the 14th Amendment has been used as one of the central tools of legal defense against labor and employment discrimination. However, not everyone agrees that the 14th Amendment is a valid argument against discrimination. When a public figure as popular as Justice Scalia expresses a divergent opinion, it is natural and logical that the public reaction will be immediate. In one of his recent interviews, Justice Scalia expressed an opinion that the 14th Amendment has nothing to do with discrimination and individual rights: according to Scalia, the U.S. Constitution by itself does not outlaw discrimination (Terkel). Rather, the Constitution simply provides the basis and creates a legal context, which allows passing legislation that outlaws different forms of discrimination against individuals (Terkel). Justice Scalia is confident that the Constitution does not prohibit discrimination, and it is within the power of U.S. legislators, not the Constitution, to enact laws that defend the fundamental rights of American citizens. As a result, the Fourteenth Amendment can hardly serve a relevant ground for legal protection against sexual and gender discrimination in the workplace or in courts. To some extent, Justice Scalia is correct: the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was passed with the intent to keep illegal immigrants and aliens from accessing and using the benefits provided by U.S. Government. This is why the 14th Amendment limits the scope of the legal rights protection to citizens or those naturalized in the United States (The 14th Amendment). It was not before the 1970s that the legal meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment was changed to become one of the key instruments and legal arguments against sexual and other types of individual discrimination in the U.S. Even today, the 14th Amendment remains the source of major legal controversies, since there is no explicit statement that could be directly related to the issue of sexual or gender discrimination. However, the role which the Fourteenth Amendment plays in the protection of individual rights and the elimination of inequality and discrimination cannot be ignored. Simultaneously, Justice Scalia’s homophobic prejudices are well-known to the American public. It is no wonder that Scalia does not believe the 14th Amendment and its equal protection clause applies to women, gays or lesbians (LaVictoire). In the notorious case of Lawrence v. Texas Justice Scalia claimed ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Justice Scalia's Fundamental Rights Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Justice Scalia'S Fundamental Rights Research Paper)
“Justice Scalia'S Fundamental Rights Research Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Justice Scalia's Fundamental Rights

Rules, Rights and Justice

...of one or both of their parents. Conclusion From the discussion above it is fundamental to note that parliament has a great role to play in today’s’ legislation process. The lawmakers must be conversant with the different laws and the plight of the minority in seeking the actual justice in a world without one. Besides, as noted also it is beneficial to state that the right channels must be followed into making sure that the laws drafted are real and serve the purpose they were meant to. A well established guideline on the ways of dealing with emergency has the best ways of Crisis management is very vital to enable the state provide the necessary basic right. The House of...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Is Justice Scalia Wise Enough in His Supreme Court Rulings

...captures the philosophies that inspired the Amendment to the Constitution. Scalia believes various constitutional changes to the US laws should be interpreted with respect to their essence at the period of amendment. Nevertheless, the justice is at pains to explain his judicial approach relative to the verdict of Brown v. Board of Education of 1954, which declared segregated learning facilities illegal. The ruling also cited the Fourteenth Amendment, which the justice interprets otherwise, as a deciding factor in the case. The enactment of the Amendment contradicts Scalia’s observations as it allowed corporations some rights under the constitution (Niose...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Justice Antonin Scalia and the Doctrine of Original Intent

...of that particular constitution. Justice Scalia opts to use an originalism theory that is softer, that is to say, interpretation should be made based on the time of constitution adaptation. Scalia feels this is much stricter as compared to allowing attempts by Justices to decipher author’s intent. Textualism is what Justice Scalia advocates for since he believes that Intent ruling is as ambiguous as a living constitution. He believes this allows greater discretion as compare to other methods of interpretation. According to the conservative originalists, rights are those made via the democratic process and written...
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper

Fundamental Rights

...Fundamental Rights Fundamental rights are a set of legal guidelines, in a legal context, formulated to protect people and offer them rights that transcend over other implications set by law or man. These fundamental rights translate to human rights that are promoted by legal concepts that emphasize the importance of human rights being fundamental rights. The concept of human rights is realized by different freedoms that people are entitled to, and they are viewed as essential constituents of a just life. These freedoms allow people to...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Fundamental rights

...?Comparison between Four Fundamental Individual's Rights, ly Health Care, Social Care, Privacy, and Education, as Mentioned in the Constitution of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait Both the states, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are economically strong enough to spend on the fundamental individual’s rights of its people, to ensure adherence to high individual standards, as envisaged in the United Nations directives. Although Saudi Arab and Kuwait are relatively new entrants with relatively less mature legal framework to other advanced countries of the world, yet these states have made huge strides in the matter of empowering their people by safeguarding their health care, social, educational, and privacy interests at policy level. The real issue... is that...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Justice, Rights and State

...Running Head: Justice, Rights and Justice, Rights and of The fundamental goal of any country is justice whereas in many other countries it is power. Many countries fail to implement justice because there is only one type of justice and all countries follow their own rules. So it can be said that every society has the right to pursue this justice or not. The main role or purpose of justice is to set limits, but the question is that can a state decide to follow no limits on benefits or losses. It is proven that almost every country of the world rely on...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Fundamental Rights of EU Law

.... 4 The Edicts of Ashoka which were inscribed in boulders and cave walls in Northern India showed that even in 272-231 BC, human rights was practiced and recognised by the Emperor Asoka of the Indian dynasty of Maurya. Etched were social and moral precepts that included respect for man's dignity, religion, justice, tolerance, truthfulness, kindness, right to prisoners to be heard and to make an appeal for their cases, amnesty, respect for animal life, establishment of 'officers of the faith' to ensure that citizens are free...
66 Pages(16500 words)Dissertation

Protection of Fundamental Rights in EU

...of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression and information, freedom of assembly and of association, freedom of the arts and sciences, right to education are just to name a few. European countries always had fundamental rights and liberties5; only they had never taken a consistent form of a group or a union. Fundamental rights have really empowered the European union citizens and to see that, there is no other better place than European Court of Justice where the citizens vociferously fight for these new rights that have become theirs now. With this, EU has tried to wipe out centuries of inner...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Public Order Legislation and Fundamental Rights

...the freedom to protest6. But this right to public assembly is not one of the fundamental rights, such as that of the right to life or the right against torture7, therefore these rights may be regulated to some extent by the Government through the police in the interest of maintaining law and order. But how far can policing be extended? While these rights may certainly be regulated, they cannot be obstructed and developments that have been occurring within the UK for the past two decades appear to point in that direction. The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act of 1994: Public protest has been a part...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Women's Rights

...Women rights Women rights is a global social and development concern. Looking back at history, women have made prodigious strides in fighting for their rights. They were always discriminated in suffrage, opportunities at the workplace and even in education. However, today, gender inequality continues to create a huge barrier for many women. Especially those who are poor, those discriminated in terms of color or even immigrants. Continuing struggles against gender inequality include ensuring equal education and economic opportunities and stopping gender-based violence (Fernandez 72). Criminal justice system is in the front line in addressing harm to girls and...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Justice Scalia's Fundamental Rights for FREE!

Contact Us