Nobody downloaded yet

Trial by Jury, Is the Lamp That Shows That Freedom Lives - Assignment Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
“TRIAL BY JURY…IS THE LAMP that shows that freedom lives” One of the most fundamental rights of a person accused of a criminal offence is the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty by a jury. The right to a trial by jury is a cherished right in this jurisdiction as it was decreed that a freeman shall not be imprisoned unless by the judgement of his peers1 however this deeply enshrined tradition of “being tried by a jury of one’s peers” is under attack because it is slow and it entails more expense than a trial before the magistrates’ courts…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96% of users find it useful
Trial by Jury, Is the Lamp That Shows That Freedom Lives
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Trial by Jury, Is the Lamp That Shows That Freedom Lives"

Download file to see previous pages The task of this paper is to determine whether “the lamp that shows that freedom lives” has lost its glow or is there still a need for jury service? The answers to the questions are in the affirmative. The prevailing government policy is to limit access to trial by jury to the most serious offences or indictable offences such as murder and rape and persons accused of summary offences such as driving offences, drunkenness or disorderly behaviour, common assault and criminal damage where the damage cost is less than ?50003 shall not be entitled to a trial by jury. Cases of this nature shall fall within the jurisdiction of the Magistrates Court. On the other hand, the Magistrates or Crown Court has concurrent jurisdiction over offenses such as theft, burglary and assault resulting in actual bodily harm, these are otherwise known as the “tri-able either way” offences. However, before a case is sent to the Crown Court, the Magistrates Court shall first determine if the case is grave enough to warrant an indictment before the Crown. Jury participation is seen to have been gradually dissipated or eroded. Before 1927, a coroner’s inquests is participated by juries to determine if there is sufficient ground to indict the person accused of the crime of killing to stand trial-either for murder or manslaughter. However, jury participation in 1927 was to limited inquest cases and under the Coroners Act 19884, coroner’s jury shall be necessary only when there is reason to suspect a death occurred in prison; in police custody or as a result of police causing injury; which is reportable under separate legislation to a government department or officer or to the Health & Safety Executive; occurring in circumstances prejudicial to public health or safety; and in any other case where it appears to him that there is reason to do so. Under the guise of administration of law and speedy disposition of cases, trial by jury is restricted in minor offences and this is advocated to favour the victims of more serious or heinous crimes. Jury participation was dispensed with under the proposed Counter-Terrorism Bill 2008 where the Home Office Secretary is empowered to create special inquests for reasons of national security or when public interest requires it. Although this provision was removed from the Counter-Terrorism Bill, it was included in the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. Jury trial has likewise been abolished in civil cases except for cases involving libel and false imprisonment as well as in the Domestic Violence Crime and Victims Act 2004.5 The first argument proffered by the government that trial by jury is a slow process is indeed valid considering that it involves jury selection, interpretation of the law and summation of evidence by the judge and ending with the deliberation of the jury to either acquit or convict however expediency should not sacrifice the right of the accused to be tried by his peers summoned to make an fair and impartial ruling. This is a substantial right which cannot be withdrawn at will by the government because this guarantees that the accused’ ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Trial by Jury, Is the Lamp That Shows That Freedom Lives Assignment”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Trial by Jury, Is the Lamp That Shows That Freedom Lives Assignment)
“Trial by Jury, Is the Lamp That Shows That Freedom Lives Assignment”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Trial by Jury, Is the Lamp That Shows That Freedom Lives

The Trial of John Peter Zenger and Jury Nullification

...with the freedom of speech and freedom of the press. This paper shall look into the Zenger trial and its legacy of jury nullification and freedom of speech and of the press. The Antecedent Facts Although the case banners Zenger’s name, he is in fact a mere collateral personality in this entire hullabaloo. His participation is actually limited to being the printer of The New York Weekly Journal, no more, no less. The case traces its history way back to the arrival of Governor William Cosby into the shores of America. When Cosby arrived in August 1731, New York was under the capable hands of Rip Van Dam as Acting Governor. Van Dam, a member of the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Thw Right To Elect Trial By Jury in Hong King

...? The Right to Elect Trial By Jury in Hong Kong By Contents Contents 2 Introduction 3 The Rationale for Trial byJury 4 Historical Overview 4 The Merits of Trial by Jury 4 The Rationale for the Decision in Chiang 6 Background 6 Chiang’s Ruling: No Right to Jury Trial in Hong Kong 7 Conclusion 13 Bibliography 14 Question 2: In Chiang Lily v Secretary for Justice (2010) HKCU 698 and Chiang Lily v Secretary for justice (2009) 6 HKC, both the Court of Final Appeal and the court of Appeal agreed that " defendants do not have a right to elect for a trail by jury". How far do you agree with the courts' decisions?...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Trial by jury has no place in modern Britain

...of the jury system in England has been combined with the principle of liberty; more specifically, the presence of juries in trials in England reflected the liberty of people to participate in important issues related to the law, which, as its name notes, is common among all people in terms of its accessibility. On the other hand, the jury system in England indicates the high educational level of citizens; the latter are able to understand all the aspects of an offence but also its potential consequences in accordance with existing law (Cairns et al. 2002). This sense of freedom and of social power that the jury system offers has been the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Society and its Attraction to Jury Trial

..., allowing greater chances for fair verdicts and an equitable legal system. Disadvantages of the trial by jury system Jury bias: Deliberations on the part of the jury, is difficult to speculate and measure and it can only be assumed whether inappropriate and irrelevant factors were taken into consideration by the jurors will giving a verdict.22 Some new researches, have shown that there are chances that the jurors may be indeed be unduly affected by facts that has been asked to be ignored, thus giving it more value than the actual logical facts.23 Furthermore, the researches also showed that juries often give undue attention to prior...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Why Trial by Jury Should Be Retained

...?Why trial by jury should be retained Contents. i. introduction ii. Facts and statistics on juries iii. Objectives of the review iv. How juries operate v. Jury verdict and theory vi. Key importance of juries vii. Conclusion viii. References i. Introduction The confidence of the public in the judicial process is paramount to ensuring an effective judicial system. It is though this confidence that citizens appreciate the independence and the important role played by the judicial system. Trial through a jury has been a long tradition in the justice system that it is considered as unique approach in the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Is Trial by Jury an Efficient and Just System

..., and different perspectives (Saks). By contrast, a judge brings only one background to the case, which is their own (Saks). For example, a judge that is male, Caucasian, had an education through private schooling, and lived in an all-white neighborhood for all of his life can little understand what compels a barely English-speaking Hispanic single mother with five children at home, a spouse in jail, and no money for food, to steal a loaf of bread. However, a jury that could possibly have a single parent within its numbers would better understand the circumstances that might have led to the occurrence of the crime. In this manner, a trial by jury is a just and efficient...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Jury Trial Analysis

...of the defendant’s lawyer’s request. Thus, if the judge would agree, no defense is necessary and the case would simply be dismissed. Based on the argument of Hornberger, the judges can reasonably create a significant twist in here as they are quiet unable to distinguish the law from justice. In a sense, Hornberger points out that bias is still remarkable in a trial by jury. This can still happen even though the right for fair trial and freedom of speech are remarkable. Judge’s charge to the jury Generally, there are three main important things that the judge would do at this point. The judge would explain the jury’s jobs, the things they...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay


..., as representatives of the jury, the defendants must not to be offered with the opportunity of selecting as well as composing juries in accordance with their races and communal backgrounds. As in the case of Swain v. Alabama - 380 U.S. 202 (1965) (Justia, 1965) and Batson v. Kentucky (No. 84-6263) (LII, 1985), the judiciary composed in the trials of these cases included majority of jurors belonging from the petitioners respective racial backgrounds and communities, which led to biasness in the process decision making. The defendants, with this facility of composing juries on the basis of their choices, will certainly lead to inappropriate legal decisions and procedures....
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Petit (Trial) Jury

...Petit (Trial) Jury PETIT (TRIAL) JURY Sentence Definition A petit jury consists of a group of citizens chosen from a district that is used to question facts in a case. It tests the accusation’s accuracy via standards of proof. They are supervised by the trial judge who gives direction on the evidence to be viewed and the applicable laws, sometimes even directing the verdict. Historically, they consist of twelve members. Expanded Definition for first year student Defendants are guaranteed jury trials by the Sixth Amendment. The jury sitting in a case is technically referred to as a...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework

The Place of a Jury Trial in Modern

...The Place of a Jury Trial in Modern Introduction Throughout history, law has been the underlying factor that has governed society. The law enforced varies depending on the region and doctrine of a region, for example, a socialist and a communist region. However, every law has its provision for settlement of disputes. In any modern society, disputes are settled by virtue of a trial. A trial can therefore be described as the coming together of two parties to a dispute. The aim of the two parties is to present compelling information in the form of evidence. This evidence is presented before a tribunal which has been mandated by law to adjudicate the claims... or ...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Trial by Jury, Is the Lamp That Shows That Freedom Lives for FREE!

Contact Us