We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Corporate Structures and Governance Arrangements - Coursework Example

Comments (0)
Corporate Structures and Governance Arrangements Course and code Date Introduction It is important to study the way corporations are structured and governed to avoid possible cases of mismanagement. It is possible to note that even in a country; there are many differences in terms of the corporate administration and management…
Download full paper

Extract of sample
Corporate Structures and Governance Arrangements

Download file to see previous pages... In the pre-bureaucratic corporate structure, there is a centralized structure with the role of strategic decision making left to the top management leaders, which is the best for solving very simple problems. This system is very common among the small corporate and mostly communication is done on one-on-one basis. Though, it lacks a fundamental role, that is, standardization of roles and responsibility, the consequences of this structure on managerial accountability is that it helps the strategic director to influence and control development and growth of the corporate organization2. How Appointment Rights and Removal Rights Differ and Their Consequences Having looked at the Hampel Report, one comes to consensus that corporate structures and governance arrangement vary from one country, an individual can use the same rights differ across the jurisdiction. The main explanation for this is that the structure of a particular and how it is governed would define how decisions and appointment rights come about in that particular corporation and as a result each decision comes about with its consequences3. It is how rights are allocated that would ensure that the corporation gives quality performance. For example, in a corporate structure where decision rights and appointments are left in the hands of the shareholders, there is a common tendency that the organisation would experience some positive effects in its operations. That is, the shareholders are at times driven by the desire to reap the highest revenues and profits from the company4. Therefore, it would make sure the appointment and removal of directors from the corporation is done in a transparent way and the appointments done based on merit. In countries where decision making and appointment rights are left to the chief executive officer because he/she has broader business knowledge than the shareholders. The main argument for the proponents of this structure is that the chief executive officer knows how effective the mangers are in their daily business operations. In fact, they know when and how to make strategic decisions. However, the consequences of this structure are that it takes a lot of time to transfer certain decision making information to the rest of the organisation. It is also tedious to make all the decisions by oneself, and in case of the appointment and dismissal of directors, then one can consider the action taken to be personal and bias, and this can bring about some unnecessary, tension, conflict and tension in the organisation5. Another different structure is that which foresees all the decisions and appointment rights based on the management, especially if the corporation is a family enterprise. This method is always considered cheaper in terms of experts/employees hiring costs. However, this structure and governance arrangement has its own demerits. Despite the savings on expenditure, decision making in this case is guided more by emotions and this out rightly affects the corporation negatively6. It also seeks to over centralize powers and rights to make decisions to the family members, this would mean that there might be lack of relevant information flowing down to other stakeholders of the corporation. However, it is important to note that decision rights and appointments have their own effects. Therefore, one should not be ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Corporate governance
The CEO represents a management not a board. However, the board is represented by a chairman, who is authorised to oversight the management and make certain strategic decisions about a company. Corporate governance is defined as how the companies are controlled and directed.
4 Pages(1000 words)Coursework
Corporate governance
As a result, it felt necessary to provide some rules and advice in various areas of company management. Cadbury Report (1992) Greenbury Report (1995), Hampel Report (1998). Turnbull Report (1999) and Higgs Review (2003) were issued to address some specific corporate objectives.
4 Pages(1000 words)Coursework
International corporate governance
e maximisation of shareholder value.”3 The corporate sectors of the US and UK are typified by a comparatively huge number of ‘quoted, a liquid capital market where ownership and control rights are traded frequently, and few inter-corporate equity holdings.’4 On the contrary, Japan’s and Germany’s corporate sectors are typified by a comparatively few ‘quoted companies, an illiquid capital market where ownership and control rights are traded infrequently, and many inter-corporate shareholdings.’5 Therefore, the corporate sectors of the US and UK have ‘outsider’ corporate governance system, whereas the corporate governance systems of Japan and Germany are ‘insider’ ones.6 T
14 Pages(3500 words)Coursework
Corporate Governance
An attractive theme of corporate governance is its mechanisms that try to avoid the principal-agent problem. In recent years, especially after the collapse of American corporate giants like Enron, WorldCom, and Parmalat, organisations have been vehemently working to improve their corporate governance.
6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework
Corporate Governance
Discuss one way in which you would improve the current scenario in regard to corporate governance. Introduction The corporate world is full of stories and events- some good and some bad, some which make the news and some which never see the light of day. Competition, personal greed, pressure from stakeholders and other sources are some reasons why business managers, owners and CEOs indulge in bad and unethical business practices like embezzlement and misappropriation of funds, false accounting records, misleading valuations of assets and liabilities and a whole lot of other things that bring a bad reputation to themselves and the companies they represent.
6 Pages(1500 words)Coursework
Corporate Structures and Governance Arrangements Vary Widely From Country to Country
In practice, to what extent are those differences of any consequence? Introduction As per Dalton and Dalton (2005), in recent years, managerial accountability has attained a fast increase in accountability pressures particularly on large multi-national companies.
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay
Regional integration arrangements
The world is becoming more and more interdependent and whether people think globalization is a good or bad thing, it is here to stay. Along with globalization, regional integration is a force to be reckoned with in the twenty-first century. As the world becomes increasingly interdependent, different regions of the globe are becoming increasingly integrated.
17 Pages(4250 words)Coursework
Collaborative governance arrangements. Background of collaborative governance
Confrontations have grown to be usual associations, whether aligned with violence, drugs, or else scarcity. The idiom of struggle has grown to be tangled amid the faction of collaboration, as even the most antagonistic acquirement strategy is prepared to emerge like the company moreover matrimony.
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay
Corporate Governance
ensation policies for the top level executives of the company, managers will feel motivated consequently, making them remain committed to the implementation of the company’s strategies (Hitt, Ireland & Hoskisson, 2012). Moreover, by allowing independent audits of financial
1 Pages(250 words)Coursework
Corporate governance and audit
The managers have full information about the company and the mangers focuses on the short term goal rather than long term goals of the organization. The main purpose of reducing the agency theory is that the theory states that
9 Pages(2250 words)Coursework
Let us find you another Coursework on topic Corporate Structures and Governance Arrangements for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us