Nobody downloaded yet

The death penalty is not a deterrent - Research Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The Death Penalty is Not a Deterrent Introduction Society should judge conduct, not human worth. If we punish a criminal, it is because of what he had done to his victim, not because he was that bad and society must punish him. Criminal law states that society must judge conduct and not souls…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92% of users find it useful
The death penalty is not a deterrent
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The death penalty is not a deterrent"

Download file to see previous pages Pillsbury argued that it is the violence of our crimes that is the problem and not the number of crimes. And in dealing with the American homicide problem, we need to approach it squarely with all the help we can muster from social scientists, lawyers, police officers, community leader and activists, even novelists and movie makers. Each of these people provides a different perspective on what makes people commit crime, and each provides a different solution in dealing with the criminal who committed the crime. (Pillsbury 3) A police officer who apprehended the criminal may want conviction and incarceration. The psychiatrist may ask for psychiatric treatment, while a social reformer may ask that the offender be given family support which he/she lacked when the crime was committed. Each professional or actor in the justice system may want a different approach. But this will hold only for as long as each respects the other. The criminal, after a psychiatric treatment, may find himself a promoter of social reform, but not capital punishment. This paper will provide an answer to the question whether the criminal deserves punishment and not the death penalty. Is capital punishment a deterrent to a convict’s commission of another crime? Or is it a deterrent for others to commit a crime? Literature Review Proponents of the death penalty provide four fundamental rationales in imposing it: ‘deterrence, instrumental perspective, retribution, and incapacitation’ (Lambert and Clarke, qtd. in Elechi, Lambert and Ventura 110). Proponents argue that people can be stopped from committing crimes by imposing severe sanctions and executing criminals deters others who planned to commit crimes from doing so. Proponents also advocate that the death penalty is an ‘effective deterrent than life imprisonment’ (Elechi et al 110). Retribution is vengeance (Mitchell 480). Statistics about homicide rates in conjunction with execution rates Since 1999 the murder rate has remained unchanged despite the decline of death sentences, executions, and the size of death row. (“Death Penalty Information Center” para. 1) In the so-called execution capital of the nation, Texas, executions go up the same thing with homicide. For example in Bexar, San Antonio, with a population of about 1.4 million, the murder rate is 14.91, executions registered at 18 and executions per 1,000 murders are 4.3; in El Paso, a population of .7 million, the murder rate is 6.60, execution 1; in Tarrant (Ft. Worth), population of 1.5, murder rate is 12.78, executions 22, and executions per 1,000 are 6.5; in Dallas, a population of 2.2 million, the murder rate is 19.33, executions 26, and executions per 1000 murders are 3.1. The hiatus in executions during 1972 to 1976 was brought about by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Furman v. Georgia, which states that capital punishment in America was cruel and unusual punishment. (“Mortal Justice: The Demography of the Death Penalty” 40) Statistics about homicide rates in conjunction with life imprisonment States, which do not have the death penalty and only have life imprisonment, have reported lower murder rates. In 2010, the murder rate in death penalty states was 5.00, while the murder rate in non-death penalty states was 4.01 or a difference of 25%. In other words, death penalty or life imprisonment has no deterrence on violent crimes like murder. The murder rate is calculated by dividing the total ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The death penalty is not a deterrent Research Paper - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(The Death Penalty Is Not a Deterrent Research Paper - 1)
“The Death Penalty Is Not a Deterrent Research Paper - 1”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The death penalty is not a deterrent

Death Penalty maintain a criminal in the prison for the rest of the life (Paternoster and Bacon 91). Those against argue that the financial amount required is pegged on the long court procedures, legal wrangling and many endless appeals. A criminal can be on death row for up to 20 years (Baumgartner, Boydstun and De Boef 47). This is very expensive for the state due to the said legal procedures. Supporters of the death penalty state that it is better to use state resources to penalize the murderers in order to save lives of innocent people. They categorically state that this action creates crime deterrent. Crime would always be on the increase if there is no any stern action taken...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Death penalty

...?Death Penalty In a world characterized by all forms of crimes, law and justice are very important aspects in the society. There are different levelsof crimes. Some are civil while others are capital. Governments and religious organization dictate the course of justice to the offended and the punishment to the convicted in the society. There are various forms of justice and punishment applied by governments and religious groups. Different crimes require different punishments. Among such punishments is the death penalty. However, in also most all cases the power to prescribe a punishment rests with the courts of law that are arms of the government. Death...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The Deterrent Effects of the Death Penalty: Tangible or Mythical

...The Deterrent Effects of the Death Penalty: Tangible or Mythical? Introduction The death penalty, or capital punishment, is the act of granting the state power to execute an individual convicted of certain crimes. Deterrence is the idea that the example of punishing one crime can prevent future commission of crimes by the criminal or other would-be criminals (Melusky & Pesto, p. 109). General deterrence works by convincing the general public that engaging in criminal activity will be harshly punished, thus discouraging them. Specific deterrence is whereby identified criminals are prevented from...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Death penalty

...Jane Doe Introduction Death penalty is when a government takes the life of an individual as punishment for wrong doing.This form of punishment is the most extreme punishment that a government can use on its citizens. It has been used at different times in many societies in all parts of the world, though mainly as a last resort in a small number of cases. At the beginning of the 20th century, nearly all countries practiced some form of capital punishment, but it is no longer used in most countries (Stearman, 2007). The benefits and drawbacks of the death penalty are debated widely. Can it ever be justified? And if it can, under what circumstances should it be used? Does...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Death Penalty

...Module Death Penalty Is the death penalty moral? Does it curb crime? The issue of the death penalty raises many questions and the answer on its effects varies depending on the respondent. The crucial dilemma lies on the legality of the death penalty and its effectiveness in curbing crime. Death penalty is defined as the use of death to punish criminal law offenders. It has been applied as a form of punishment since the colonial era. Recent statistics on the crime rate indicate that the death penalty is ranked amongst the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

The death penalty is not a deterrent

...? The Death Penalty is not a deterrent Introduction Capital punishment is still debated because the pros and cons won’t just stop and their arguments are as old as the issue itself. But there are studies strongly suggesting that the debate should have stopped long ago because the evidence has shown that there is no deterrent effect of capital punishment, and it is only a myth. The study of Michael Radelet and Traci Lacock conducted in 2008, a confirmation of a 1996 study of the same nature, used a sample of top criminologists who were asked if the death penalty had a deterrent effect using the empirical studies that had...
10 Pages(2500 words)Research Paper

Death penalty the killing. Regardless of the reasons or justification for killing a person, a justified killing is tantamount to the application of barbaric and vengeful instincts. In the end, it does not diminish the impact of the crime on the victims and their families; the imposition of the death penalty will not bring back their dead relative, nor will it repair the damage that the crime has inflicted upon them and their families. In fact, the death penalty can sometimes end up breeding more pain and contempt, this time from the family of the convict. It is also important to consider that the death penalty is not an effective...
5 Pages(1250 words)Research Paper

Death Penalty

...? Death Penalty Death Penalty Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, has, in the past, been exercised by many jurisdictions (Gaie, 2012). However, these days, only 58 nations actively exercise it and 97 nations have done away with it. The rest, nearly 50 states, have not utilized the law for a decade. They, however, permit it in exceptional situations for instance during wartimes. It is an issue of active controversy in numerous states and countries, and positions can differ in a single cultural region or political ideology. In the European Union (EU) member countries, the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights...
3 Pages(750 words)Research Paper

Death penalty abolish capital punishment. Supporters of the death penalty argue that murder is a violation of the most fundamental of human rights: the right to life and this heinous crime merits the deathpenalty. Their contention is that justice, which is the basic tenet of the legal system, mandates that the punishment is appropriate to the seriousness of the crime. Here, the death penalty is the only punishment which is in proportion to the crime of depriving the victim of life. As murder violates the sanctity of life, justice is served only by the award of the death penalty. 1 Deterrence...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Deterrent Effect of Death Penalty: An Annotated Bibliography

... 29 June Deterrent Effect of Death Penalty: An Annotated Bibliography The research question is: Does death penalty have a deterrent effect on violent crimes? Narayana, P.K., & Smyth, R. (2006, September 20). Dead man walking: An empirical reassessment of the deterrent effect of capital punishment using the bounds testing approach to cointegration. Applied Economics, 38 (17), 1975-1989. The goal of this study was to examine the deterrent effect of capital punishment on murder. Narayana and Smyth used a “bounds testing procedure to cointegration, within an autoregressive distributive lag (ARDL) framework” to study trends in time series data from 1965 to 2001 (p.1976). Its main difference with other studies is that it used... the...
3 Pages(750 words)Annotated Bibliography
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Research Paper on topic The death penalty is not a deterrent for FREE!

Contact Us