Nobody downloaded yet

Foreseeability. Negligence and Tort - Assignment Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
Summary
Foreseeability
In an event that the plaintiff fails to prove any one element, then he or she loses the entire tort of negligence claim. The following elements should be proved: factual and legal causation, duty of care, damages, and breach of duty…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.3% of users find it useful
Foreseeability. Negligence and Tort
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Foreseeability. Negligence and Tort"

Download file to see previous pages The essence of existence of specific relationship between parties to establish negligence claims is based on the logic that such a claim can only arise in acts and omissions relating to these elements (Cooke, 2005, p. 12). Normally, it is assumed that such claims can be levelled against a third party because such party is liable for acts or omissions that led to harm, injury, or loss. However, in some circumstances, an individual may be in specific relationship with a third party and have a duty to control the conduct of the third party so as to prevent harm, injury, or loss to the claimant (Kidner, 2006, p.25). Control over the third party includes but not limited to the following: parent and child, car owner and a drunken or incompetent driver, mental hospital and patient, parent and child, and gaoler and prisoner. The need for control over a third party is informed by the position taken by Lord Goff in Smith v Littlewoods [1987] 1 All ER 710 at 731 when analyzing the rule of mere- omissions and making considerations for the exceptions to this rule. Lord Goff argued that there are some circumstances where the courts have established affirmative action duties. One of these circumstances is that the defendant has control over a third party who has caused damage to the claimant.
Control over a third party is an affirmative action that has been given rise by a number of relationships. Examples of these relationships are parent and child and employer and employee, where the defendant has an affirmative duty to prevent harm (Kidner, 2006, p. 71). Normally, there should be a chain of causation between the negligence of the defendant and the damage caused to the claimant, as decided in Rouse v Squires [1973] QB 889. In such circumstances, the third party may be held liable for the claimant’s damage. However, where the defendant has control over a third party, or in circumstances where the third party is ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Foreseeability. Negligence and Tort Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1396024-foreseeability-negligence-and-tort
(Foreseeability. Negligence and Tort Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1396024-foreseeability-negligence-and-tort.
“Foreseeability. Negligence and Tort Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1396024-foreseeability-negligence-and-tort.
  • Cited: 1 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
fr
franktreutel added comment 1 year ago
Student rated this paper as
This paper saved me today. I liked the style. It was very useful for my law course.

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Foreseeability. Negligence and Tort

Tort of Negligence

...that even the most virtuoso experts in jurisprudence do tend to overlook and appreciate the sophistication and beauty inherent in the concept of ‘the man on the Clapham Omnibus’. However, the reality is that this legal idiom not only validated the concept of negligence in the English Tort Law, but also attempted to quantify and contain it in as realistic and rational a manner as possible. As per the English Tort Law, the essential elements of Negligence are: A Duty of Care- Donahue vs. Stevenson (1932) laid a three step test for the establishment of a duty of care on the part of a defendant, as per which the defendant must have been able to reasonably...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Negligence and tort law

...? Negligence and tort law of Outline 0 Part I 1 Negligence and tort Law 1.2 Structure of Negligence 1.3 Duty of Care 1.4 Breach of duty 1.5 Legal and Factual Causation 1.6 Harm 1.7 Damages 2.0 Part II 2.1 Case analysis 3.0 Conclusion 4.0 References PART I Negligence and tort law The branch of Tort law covering negligence involves harm that results from a failure to take due care that a prudent person in the same circumstance as the tortfeasor would have.it is part of English Common Law and as such its development is hinged on judicial decisions. It does not cover injury that results from...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Tort of negligence

...?Question Presented What is the role of the chain of causation in the tort of negligence? A tort is a civil, as opposed to criminal, wrong that isrecognized by law as grounds for a lawsuit and is redressed by an award of damages. Smith v. United States, 507 U.S. 197 (1993). The wrong must result in some sort of injury that is compensable by monetary damages. Some of these include: loss of earnings capacity, pain and suffering, and reasonable medical expenses. (Cornell University School of Law, Legal Information Institute). Torts fall into one of three categories, intentional, negligent and strict liability. (Id.). Tort law is considered...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Law - Tort of Negligence

...? Tort of negligence of Institute Introduction Though Castle Cricket Club has remedy in contract as there was no consideration given it can still sue Brunel under the tort of negligence. The tort of negligence is a tort that awards damages for a breach of duty owed by the defendant to the plaintiff resulting in damage to the plaintiff undesired by the defendant (Keenan, 2007. P. 265). The tort of negligence was created in the House of Lords in 1932. Before then, the courts studied the circumstances of the case and so if there was precedent and decided, based on all these, if the plaintiff...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Negligence

...? Negligence of Introduction Records and reports indicate that more nurses are being sued for malpractice by theday. In fact, this trend, most evident in the last decade, is expected to increase given that there have been no indications of the signs disappearing. These signs persist despite the tremendous efforts of nursing educators, trainers and campaigners to inform practicing and student nurses about their personal, legal and professional responsibilities and limitations (Phillips et al., 2004). Quite apparent in these campaigns, education, training is the distinction among malpractice, negligence, and gross negligence. This paper explores the differences among...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Psychiatrict-negligence in Tort Law

...factory. Eric is thus, a primary victim. Dwain as a defendant in this scenario is a neighbor to Eric and therefore owes Eric a duty of care. It is Eric’s legal right to live in a stress free life, and his neighbor, the knitting needle factory is liable to compensate him for any harm he experiences, which may originate from the factory’s operations. This accident caused Eric substantial physical and psychological harm and is, thus, a tort of negligence on the factory’s part because it should have ensured that all wiring would not be foreseeably harmful to any neighbor proximal to its premises. This event caused physical and psychiatric injury and eventually the demise of Eric, a member of...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Foreseeability in Law

...Does the requirement for a plaintiff in a negligent case to prove foreseeability make sense Shouldn't a defendant be responsible for all the actual consequences of the careless conduct Is it fair that an injured party might be able to recover from no one The tort of negligence is a breach of a duty of care on the part of the defendant which results in the injury of the plaintiff. One component of negligence is foreseeability. It must have been reasonably foreseeable (what a reasonable person would anticipate) that the conduct of the defendant could result in the injury of another party. This element must be satisfied in...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment

Tort of Negligence

... Tort of Negligence In order to establish whether clumsy can claim negligence against you, we will examine the case and will try to see if the tort of negligence applies in this case. We will also examine whether there is any defence available. Tort of Negligence means carelessly causing damage or injury to the other person. You may not have wanted to cause the injury but it happens as a result of certain task performed by you or the non-performance of a task that you needed to perform. There are basically three requirements which need to be fulfilled in order to prove that the defendant was negligent and the injury to the plaintiff was caused as a result of this negligence. Duty of Care – This is the first thing which needs... to be...
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment

Tort - Negligence Assessment

...to the conditions falling within the ambit of tort of negligence, the criteria which indicate that a duty of care may arise in any given situation are: the foreseeability of the damage, proximity between the party owing duty of care and the party to whom duty of care is owed, and a situation that is reasonable and just enough for the court of law to impose a duty of a specific scope on the responsible party, for the party to which duty of care is owed. Question 8 It is most likely that Lord Bridge would use these criteria as a general “test” to establish a duty of care in every situation. The reason for this is twofold. One, he sees previous cases such as Anns v Merton London Borough...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Tort of Negligence

...Tort of Negligence Table of Contents With Reference To Taha And Relevant Case Law, Identify The Criteria That Need To Be Satisfied For A Successful Claim In The Tort Of Negligence. 3 2. How Might The Courts Establish Whether Mike Can Claim For Economic Loss Against Pitcher And Co. 4 3. Both Cases Are Referred To The Court Of Appeal. With Reference To The Court Structure Of The English Legal System, Explain Which Courts The Court Of Appeal Would Be Binding Upon. 5 4. In Deciding The Cases Before Them, Discuss Whether The Judge Can Depart From Previous Decisions Made In The Court Of Appeal. 7 References 9 1. With Reference To Taha And Relevant Case Law, Identify The...
4 Pages(1000 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Foreseeability. Negligence and Tort for FREE!

Contact Us