Nobody downloaded yet

Questions on Law - Assignment Example

Comments (1) Cite this document
How the prosecution is likely to respond to the motion and how the judge is likely to rule
The suspects were booked after the police followed a tip of their involvement in a crime. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Questions on Law
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Questions on Law"

Download file to see previous pages The police officer who witnessed their act together with his back up team issued citation for the suspects. The gang moved a motion for dismissal of their cases on the ground that their citations were issued by officers who lacked probable cause. Legal principle: Prosecution’s reasoning The case is based on the principle of probable cause for making an arrest. Under the principle, a police officer can make a warrantless arrest, and citation, if there is a sufficient probable cause. A police officer can justify the move under probable cause in two circumstances. The officer must be able to explain the information that led to the assumption that the suspect was involved in a criminal act and the officer’s move must have been based on the suspected cause (Bergman and Berman, 2011). The likely ruling In the cases of Maryland vs. Pringe, Ybarra v Illinois and the case of State v. Sokolow, it was held that the presence of an incriminating evidence and reasonable suspicion form ground for sufficient probable cause to arrest a suspect. It was further held, in the case of Alabama v. White, existence of probable cause is sufficient. The judge is therefore likely to uphold the case due to sufficiency of probable cause that the officers had (Bergman and Berman, 2011), (Carmen, 2009), (Meeker, 2004)....
The gang can use this principal to suppress the paper (Meeker, 2004). Prosecution’s likely argument The law exempts the need for warrant before a search in cases where the searches are immediately related to an arrest. In the case of Colorado v. Bertine, the courts held that searches of a person’s possession are admissible if the search is done within the immediate scope of the arrest. The prosecution can thus argue that the retrieval of the paper was incident to the issuing of citations and therefore admissible (Carmen, 2009). The judge’s likely decision The judge is likely to uphold the evidence. This is because the suspects were under the authority of the police and the case of Colorado v. Bertine would be more applicable (Carmen, 2009). Question 3 Search of Ma’s car Tony accepts citation and gets into Ma’s car. A police officer then asked to search Ma’s car and she sped off. Legal status of the search Ma was obliged to let the police officer search her car. Reason Search on motor vehicles are governed by the Fourth amendment. Under warrantless search and frisk, a motorist can be searched on two grounds. The motorist must have been reasonably suspected of association with a criminal act. A search is also called for if the police officer feels threatened. The basis of a motorist’s association with a criminal act was established in the case of Pennsylvania vs. Mimms in which it was held that there must be a legal ground for stopping the car (Carmen, 2009). Persuading the court that the search was invalid A search, considered as a breach of a person’s privacy, is valid if it is done legally. The general rule for warrantless searches is that they have to be done with free consent of the suspect ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Questions on Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Questions on Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Questions on Law Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (1)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
howewalker added comment 5 months ago
Student rated this paper as
I had an issue with a assignment types of works. All until I came across this website and this particular document. Even though "Questions on Law" is far from my studies, the structure is so great that I use it all the time as an example for my own works.


Law questions

...? Assignment Law Order Issue Whether Barkley can enter into Contractual Obligations on his own Barkley is the son of Knarles and he is aged 17. When the father had gone for the Green Facilties Management Trade Show, Barkley was responsible for handling the issues of the firm. The question which arises here is whether Barkley is legally tenable to enter into contracts on behalf of the firm. One of the most fundamental principles of Contract Law is that an individual who is below the age of 18 cannot enter into contracts with other parties. This law also applies to situations which consist of an individual entering into contracts to represent a firm which has been established under law. Applying the law to the facts, we understand... the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Law Problem Questions

...? Law Problem Questions Word Count: 1500 Evidence Problem Question ???? Max is charged with several counts of being concerned in the supply of Class A controlled drugs. ????The prosecution believe he is very important in the supply chain and have been watching him for some time. They have evidence of a very extravagant, expensive lifestyle with no other clear source of income to fund it, association with known dealers and suppliers and they have found a small quantity of drugs in his possession. He also has a very large number of text messages on his cell phones saying things such as: ????“Can you bring a bag for ?20 and meet me?” ??“Any chance of my usual, Friday 8 pm?” ??“Are you ‘big Max’? Any chance bag ?50 Thursday... before, the new...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Questions on Law

...? LAW i) The of the court is Belgian Conseil d'Etat, the administrative supreme court in Belgium. (ii) The President during these proceedings was G.C. Rodriguez Iglesias (iii) The Court of Justice construed that the first question required a determination of whether Articles 5 and 189 of the EEC Treaty prevented the Member State so that they could not approve measures which were contrary to Directive 91/156 during the time which had been given for its transposition. The Court reasoned that in accordance with Inter-Environment Wallonie there was prescription that if a directive was transposed before the expiry of the period it should be in compliance with the said directive. It was further pointed out that...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Law Questions

...Task The key element in proving material support to terrorism is mens rea. The intention of knowingly providing financial or any other form of material support to a terrorist organization has to be sustained by the prosecution in a charge of providing material support to a terrorist organization (Abram Normans, 2002, p.6). These involves the advancement of evidence that the accused, at the time of committing the offence, knew that he/she was providing material support to a terrorist organization and knew the terrorist organization in question. 2 Terrorism has been defined by different kinds of laws including the following: 1. The International Terrorism Act of 1990 2. The Patriots Act 3. The UN...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Business Law - Questions

...?Business Law Element of Contract to UK Online Selling: In order to sell a product to s through online medium, the websites offering the goods or services needs to have an explicit contract, verifiable by the consumers with a specific log, where they can express their agreement to such a contract by endorsing a tick mark thereon. Such a contract or agreement of terms of use is enforceable by law and valid for all the online transactions. It is not necessary for the sales of goods or services in this manner, to have a traditional, written document by endorsing signature in ink for it to be legally valid. Mostly in the case of online business, an advertisement on a site suffices as “a formal offer to...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Business Law Questions

...?First information Business Law Question Eva, the owner of Finest Enterprises, is a sole proprietor. Assuch, she runs and maintains ownership of the business herself. In sole proprietorship, there is no legal distinction between Eva and Finest Enterprises that is, the owner and the business are considered as one under law (Aronoff, Ward and Astrachan 22). The first advantage is that this type of business is easy to form. The business organization is simple with minimal legal formalities that includes the license and permits in special cases. The business is also easy to dissolve if Eva so wishes. The second advantage is that this type of business only needs small startup capital. Apart...
7 Pages(1750 words)Coursework

Hypothetical international law questions

...1. Set forth at least one jurisdictional theory under which each of the three nations may properly prosecute the terrorists under international law. Answer. There are several international conventions against unlawful interference with civil aviation. Among them the following are most important : 1. Tokyo Convention(1963) 2. Hague Convention (1970) 3. Montreal Convention(1971) 4. Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Act of Violence at Airports Serving International Civil Aviation, 1988 Principle of universal jurisdiction in respect of the crime of the hijacking : The principle of universal jurisdiction is recognized in respect of the crime of piracy and war crimes. Since hijacking is generally described as aerial piracy... , the...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Law Questions

...Law Questions Law questions Q1. The issue is that the people officers were called to respond to an accident and not an investigation into Fred’s life. Did the circumstances and facts provide the police officers a probable or credible cause to consider that Fred had or was going to commit a felony? Can probable cause rely on tips? In addition, the police officers did not have the right to search Fred’s possession because they lacked a valid search warrant from the court. . The “Due Process Clause” had been disobeyed when police officers coerced Fred to take breadth test. The police officers in this matter are supposed to respond to the accident not start searching Fred’s...
5 Pages(1250 words)Assignment

Business law questions

... Section/# Law Question and Answers 11. With regards to Young bringing suit against Pileggi for nonpayment, it is not a valid defense for Pileggi due to the fact that the promissory note that discussed the amount given is not sufficient to distance Young from the wrong doing that he may have committed in the first place. Simply agreeing to pay is of course not sufficient in order to undue any past wrongdoing. One can understand this by a situation in which an individual would steal something from their employer only to go to the employer at a later time and say that they will pay it back. The employee would still be ultimately responsible for the theft that they committed regardless of the extenuating circumstances of the case... place. ...
3 Pages(750 words)Assignment

Law Questions

...GROCERY, INC. SIMULATIONS Grocery, Inc. is a retail grocery store chain. It has written contracts with many different vendors Does Article 2 of the UCC apply to the contracts between Grocery, Inc. and its vendors? Do common law contracts apply? Explain your answer in detail. Your answer should compare and contrast common law contracts and UCC Article 2 contracts. Article 2 of the UCC applies to the contract because of article’s scope that governs sale of goods in which the grocery stores deal. Common law also applies to the contract because of its scope that includes law of contracts (Cross and Miller, 2011). 2. Grocery Inc. has contracted with Reliable Construction...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Assignment on topic Questions on Law for FREE!

Contact Us