StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Tortious Liability of Barbera - Coursework Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Tortious Liability of Barbera" states that the information was used by Barbera in the conduct of his duty as a journalist. It is in fact, part of his duty to convey information about public figures pertaining to the conduct of their duties. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.4% of users find it useful
Tortious Liability of Barbera
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Tortious Liability of Barbera"

?I TORTIOUS LIABILITY OF ALEX A. Factual matrix material to the potential lis Alex is the source of information which prima facie appears to be defamatory (See infra), is false and published; 2. Alex has disclosed the information to Barbera (who caused publishing) without knowledge of the fact that the information will be published. Hence, the information disclosed was without an intention to publish. B. Analysis of applicable Tort law The potential liability can be imposed on Alex for defamation. Thus, it is relevant to analyse tenants of Law of Defamation in Tort in order to conclude Alex’s risk of potential liability. According to Winfield & Jolowicz (Tort, 17th ed. ; WVH Rogers ed), in order to hold the defendant liable for defamation, the claimant has to prove the following elements: 1. The statement must be defamatory; 2. The statement must refer to the claimant; 3. It must be published i.e. communicated to atleast one person other than the claimant. The aforementioned principles as applies to the present context in the following manner: 1. The statement must be defamatory: The statements made by Alex were to the effect of degrading public image of the players and team manager. Besides causing harm to their reputation in public, the statement also tends to raise ethical questions on the players and the team manager and hence lowers them in the public eye. Vide Lord Atkin’s judgement in Sim v. Strech [(1936) 52 TLR 669], it is now the settled position of law that any statement that tends to lower the claimant in the estimation of right thinking members of the society can be defamatory. This position has been reemphasised in several of the recent judgements as well. Therefore, it cannot be said that the statement is not defamatory and accordingly, any defence on those lines will be valid, if at all, subject to unique situation of the present case and other factual considerations. 2. The statement must refer to the claimant: In the present context, it is undisputed and clear beyond doubt that the statement made is very specific to few players and the team manager. Hence, provided that a claim is brought by the named few, this element will apply and hold good. 3. The statement must be published: In order to ascertain whether this element can be satisfied in the present context, it is necessary to analyse how ‘publication’ is interpreted at common law over a period of time. The statement vis-vis Alex, is made only to one person other than the claimant. The question therefore is – whether such an act of sharing one’s belief with another person without knowledge of the fact that such beliefs/statements would be published, amounts to ‘publication’. At common law, the element of publication is satisfied even if the defamatory statement is made to one person other than the claimant. In Crossland v. Wilkinson Hardware Stores Ltd. [(2005) EWHC 481 (QB)], it was held that slander, which is defamatory statement made orally, made to one person can have a damaging effect. Having said that, another element that needs consideration is – the potential cause of action. It is a settled principle at common law that chain of causation breaks when a statement made is published as it amounts to repetition [Ward v. Weeks (1830) 7 Bing. N.C. 211 followed in Weld Blundell v. Stephens [(1920) A.C. 945]. Thus, in the present case, there would be two causes of action available to the claimants. The first being statement made by Alex to Barbera; the second being the article published in The Daily Truth. The implications differ depending upon the claimant’s choice of action. The defendant in such cases is not liable for the published article where she did not intend such publication/repetition [Cutler v. McPhail (1962) 2 Q.B. 292]. Thus, if the claimants’ cause of action the newspaper article only, then Alex cannot be held liable as she did not intend repetition or publication of the statements made. II TORTIOUS LIABILITY OF BARBERA A. Factual matrix material to the potential lis 1. Barbera has obtained false information from Alex, wife of a player from the club. Such information is about moral, ethical and conduct of other players from the club. 2. Barbera has published such information by way of an article in a newspaper without knowledge of the fact that such information is false. B. Analysis of applicable Tort Law For the sake of brevity, the three basic elements necessary to prove an action of defamation are not reiterated herein. However, it is pertinent to note that all the three elements seem to be satisfied. The statement, as aforementioned, is prima facie defamatory. It refers to the potential claimants and it is, beyond doubt, a publication. In fact, information contained in an article appearing in a newspaper is deemed to be ‘published’ to satisfy this element. In a situation where all three elements of defamation are satisfied, recourse should be taken to rely on general defences available for the Tort of Defamation. The relevant general defence in the present context is the defence of ‘Truth’. The concept envisages that all statements which are otherwise defamatory, is exempt from the scope of liability, if the statements are true. The article clearly states ‘sources close to the club revealed...’, thus, it is not the adaptation of the facts but a reiteration thereof. However, this would have been a good defence at common law before 1999. In Shah v. Standard Chatered Bank [(1999) Q.B. 240], the ‘repetition rule’ was evolved. This rule excludes such defence and presumes that repetition of a statement in a newspaper article is an adaption. Thus, where it is adapted, the defendant will be burdened to prove its truthfulness if he seeks to claim the defence of “Truth”. While it is true that Barbera might have believed in the truthfulness of the information received and that he did not have a motive to defame; but ‘where an act is either inherently or because of the manner of performance, an unprivileged invasion of right, the absence of malice or presence of a good motive does not render it any less a tort’ [Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Cudd 176 F.2d 855 (10th Cir. 1949)]. According to Corpus Juris Secundum [(86) §22 at P. 581], ‘liability in tort for an injury is generally determined by conduct, not by actor’s mental state or intent...’. Thus, Barbera’s intent and knowledge would be out of context and no defence in the presence case. Therefore, there is a strong case of him having to face liability in the present circumstances. However, the information was used by Barbera in the conduct of his duty as a journalist. It is in fact, part of his duty to convey information about public figures pertaining to the conduct of their duties. The information conveyed in the article is such information. Hence, in the course and conduct of his duties, if he fairly believed in the truthfulness of the information, it would certainly rule out malice and can in fact mitigate most of the damage claimed. This conclusion is also in commensuration with the rule laid down in Toogood v. Spyring [(1834) 1 C.M. & R. 181 at 193]. Hence, based on this rationale, it will be possible for Barbera to rely on the defence of qualified privilege. In a plethora of cases, American law recognises the media privilege that extends to reporting relevant information about public figures. It is the honest reporting of information received from a source about a public figure and belief in truthfulness of such information that attracts this privilege. Once, the privilege is granted, the publisher is exempt from liability for all statements made which otherwise would have been defamatory and attracted damages. Another ground of defence, is ‘apology’. In order to claim this defence, the publisher has to show that he believed in the truthfulness of information and that he did not intend to defame the claimant. Once the defence is allowed, the publisher is usually directed to publish another addendum to the impugned article wherein, he specifically apologises for that article and declares something which has the effect of an anecdote to lowering of reputation caused by the previous article. However, there are no legal principles laid down with regard to this defence and the grant of such defence depends on facts and circumstances of each case. In the present context, though Barbera will have grounds to claim the defence, but the grant thereof is completely within the discretion of the court. III CONCLUSION In light of the aforementioned I conclude the following: 1. There are strong grounds of defence for Alex; 2. Barbera’s case is prima facie that of defamation and the grounds of defence are weak in light of circumstances. Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Tort Law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1395086-tort-law
(Tort Law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
https://studentshare.org/law/1395086-tort-law.
“Tort Law Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1395086-tort-law.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Tortious Liability of Barbera

Florida State Court

This assignment "Florida State Court" shows that the Florida State Court would have jurisdiction over the civil case if the complaint filed was for tort and the amount of damage is $5,001/$15,000 and the parties have sufficient contact with the state of Florida.... .... ... ... The Court acquires personal jurisdiction over the plaintiff through the pleadings filed such as complaint and serves the defendants the summons and copy of the complaint....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment

Hair Care Limited: A Case under Law of Torts

The paper also discusses the liability of the hair dresser Barber towards compensating Joan for her injury and suffering.... (Cornell Law School) The torts may be classified as specific torts pertaining to trespass, assault, battery, negligence, products liability and intentional infliction of emotional distress.... Tortuous liability arises from the breach of the duty primarily fixed by law.... ther factors in accessing that reasonable care are:Probability of the thing occurringSeriousness of the event at risk if it did happenPracticality and precautionsConsideration of the social value of the defendant's activitiesProduct liability and Manufacturing Risks:A manufacturing defect will attract liability....
8 Pages (2000 words) Case Study

Book - The Police in America 8 edition

In their argument, they emphasize that this would be a viable way to improve police attitude and their performance.... However, the Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and.... ... ... Nevertheless, postsecondary education would have a favorable effect on abuse of authority by police.... College education equips officers with the Americas Police and their Education Scholars stress on the need for education and college degrees for law enforcement (America Police)....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Analysis of the Book Food Politics by Marion Nestle

The paper presents that a person who ingests indecent quantifies of darling on an everyday basis, as I do, understands that convinced things can be too sweet.... Sodas and other bottled food and drink, which the nourishment realist Marion Nestle, the writer calls "liquor candy.... .... ... ... Americans can be hopeful about rule interventions' effectiveness in address fatness because little changes in flows of calories can contain enormous impacts on persons....
14 Pages (3500 words) Case Study

Law Governing Tortuous Liability for Negligently Inflicted Pure Economic Loss

This paper "Law Governing Tortuous liability for Negligently Inflicted Pure Economic Loss" focuses on the fact that till the 1970s the law on liability for economic loss due to negligent acts was easy.... The "absence of any unifying principle drawing together the different heads of economic tort liability has often been remarked upon.... , In this case, The House of Lords thought that unions have the liability in tort for aiding workers to strike for improved pay and working conditions....
10 Pages (2500 words) Assignment

Analysis of John Fay Accident

The paper "Analysis of John Fay Accident" highlights that based on the injury incurred by John Fay which crushed his chest, he may sue the Alaska West Express, Inc.... or the Anchorage-based Lynden Inc.... for the tortuous act of the truck driver for personal injury and to recover damages.... ....
7 Pages (1750 words) Assignment

Auditor's Liability in China

The paper "Auditors' liability in China" is a great example of an assignment on finance and accounting.... The paper "Auditors' liability in China" is a great example of an assignment on finance and accounting.... The paper "Auditors' liability in China" is a great example of an assignment on finance and accounting....
12 Pages (3000 words) Assignment

Personal Wealth Management

The paper "Personal Wealth Management" is a perfect example of a finance and accounting case study.... Ensuring sustainable living standards is one of the ways that effectively steer planners towards the achievement of the set goals.... The couple currently has a relatively large amount of credit card bills accruing....
17 Pages (4250 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us