Points to Be Elucidated in the Article about Hydrotherapy - Assignment Example

Research Hydrotherapy refers to the use of water as treatment in order to pacify the physical pains and sufferings man is undergoing through. While making an examination of the theme described in the given article, as well as finding out the relationship and the consequences of hydrotherapy and hydrotherapeutic atmosphere at the level of engagement of the individuals with the erudition and the harsh physical deficiencies, some of the most significant points emerged as the information that were found to be unavailable in the retrieved article, and may jeopardize the legality as well as authority of the piece of writing for its readers and public at large. The following points are needed to be elucidated: The article does not reveal the level of engagement while discussing the listening and understanding on the basis of communication. The dependent variable i.e. communication level must have been clarified by interlinking it to the independent variable in order to interpret the concepts in the variables of hypothesis. The author must have been elaborated the concept communication level in a therapy so that the readers could fully comprehend with the ideas the author intended to explore. In order to examine the article and points given in it, it comes to know that the authors have failed to allude to the relevant literature as well as any research work so that the theme could be carried more weight. Further, the relevant material would have been supportive to for any new research article and expressed the broad knowledge and deep study of the writer. It has limited the views within the structure of the thoughts of the present authors. Moreover, the article looks unable to clarify the duration of the counseling they applied in respect of hydrotherapy treatment. The timings and the duration of the therapeutic counseling must be determined for the better understanding of the readers and patients interested in adopting the therapy for the cure. What the hydrotherapy sessions include, what kind of activities they use, who takes part in these activities and also how many times per week they applied the hydrotherapy. The article lacked the details of the therapeutic process and activities involved in it, as well as methodology implemented in the treatment technique. It does not focus why and when the patients should avail themselves of the hydrotherapy for their cure. The authors lack comprehension and ignore most fundamental principles while preparing a research work. They look unable to classify the variables even. They are not perhaps acquainted with the indicators and concepts involved in the variables. In order to fulfill the requirements of a research work, there must be an array of the indicators that the paper consists. As in this article, language, words, body language and sound serve as the indicators in the variable engagement level. As for as the communication is concerned, the concept serves as on of the ways while signifying the dependent variable i.e. engagement level, but it has not been mentioned what the author means by the term. Therefore, the new readers who have never been familiar with the therapy could not comprehend with the idea of engagement level even. The fruitfulness of a good hypothesis, according to John T. Doby, lies in its power to explain and predict the concepts in it. (1977: 71). But the article lacked the quality according to the definitions and writings of the scholars. The social researches are based on both qualitative as well as quantitative measures. (John P. Dean). But the authors of the given article could not explain the relationship in qualitative level. They only applied quantitative methods to identify the measures. It may jeopardize the readers’ concepts of analyzing the research findings in a specific way. Therefore, the findings reveal the fact that engagement level is not only related to communication, but also it gives a comprehensive know how of the relationship between counselor and the patient. In a social research, individuals are the nodes of measurement. Society serves as the universe in the research process and participants as the sample of the research. The participants of the research and the data collected from them must be elaborated in a systematic way. But the participants in this research have not been clarified significantly. Selection of the sample from the universe is one of the most important steps in a research process, which the authors have not mentioned in the present research. Research design is said to provide the base that holds the research project together. A design is used to structure the research, to show how all of the major parts of the research project including the samples or groups, measures, treatments or programs, and methods of assignment -- work together to try to address the central research questions. While discussing the research design in the present study, it can be observed that the article seems to be silent in respect of defining the methodology involved. The article does not describe the reasons for the selection and formulation of the research design involved in it. Thus, it keeps the readers in a fix to understand the research work and its findings. One of the most critical aspects of the research work includes the minimum possible strength of the sample selected for the research process. Though, the paper consists of case study where the respondents have systematically been studied and examined, yet the number is too small to carry weight. The participation of mere three individuals cannot justify the validity of the results of the research process. Moreover, the article offers no justification of choosing the case study method based on longitudinal research. Though it has exactly applied the deductive to inductive method, yet with the help of very little number of participants, it becomes really hard to conduct a successful research work. The article does not signify the procedure of replication. Replication is conducted in order to strengthen the findings of the research conducted and it proves or rejects either the null or alternate hypotheses as population parameters as soon as the research is conducted. But the authors have no intention of describing the replication after doing the case studies of three participants. The present article shows an upward trend while revealing the engagement level of the participants in the course of therapeutic treatment. But there appear some complications in this regard. One of the most contradictory elements involved in it includes that the increase in the engagement levels cannot be stated as a reliable one due to the fact that the operationalization of the variables involved in the study do not prove it. Furthermore, the research work looks unable to mention the relationship between engagement levels and the therapeutic environment. As it is an elementary concept, it must have been interpreted while stating the hypothesis and conducing the research. Thus, it is a significant flaw in the whole research work. In addition, the researchers do not specify at all regarding the statistical instrument, which had been exercised in the study while collecting the data. It is really amazing why the authors do not feel the need of describing the basic requirements in respect of instrument selection. Furthermore, the researchers tested the hypothesis while applying only one single statistical method that cannot be stated as an appropriate one. There must be a more than one tests and they could apply chi-square or t-test etc along with. It could strengthen the outcomes of the data collected for the current research work. Neither the researchers concentrated on the explanation regarding population from where they made sampling, nor they made any attempt to reveal the fact which kind of sampling i.e. probability or non-probability as well as cluster, snow-ball or any type has been described. It is also strange to note that the steps of the whole research procedure from choosing the research problem and stating the hypothesis onward contain many flaws that could be found out by even the students of social research methodology. One of the most important matters in a research procedure includes the selection of an appropriate environment whether controlled or not. The research findings look dumb while revealing the choosing of counseling environment for the hydrotherapeutic treatment. The researchers are unable to determine the targets, which must be set before and after each and every session. Thus, the readers find no justification of entering into and beginning the next session without analyzing the drawbacks of the previous one. Moreover, if one has not set the targets, how could he move forward to begin the new one? Thus, it is a question mark that must have been interpreted in the findings of the research work. In addition, the article does not state clearly which of the researchers implied the hydrotherapeutic treatment procedure. This is really one of the basic demerits of the research work. In addition, a more significant matter to note is that the researchers have already set up a causal relationship between independent and dependent variables, that is sure to eclipse the unbiased findings of the research work. The more fatal mistake is surely the involvement of some other variable as well as the presence of participants. Therefore, the counseling must be effected by the already determined results. That is why the researchers do not mention why they do not explain the outline of all the sessions. The actual number and frequency of the hydrotherapeutic treatment has been observed. But the article does not state clearly which were the factors that led the researchers determining six sessions in all. Why should not they select more or less than the six sessions? It is also just a question mark while revealing the findings as well as procedure of the social research. The relationship between engagement levels and hydrotherapeutic environment is significant one. Therefore, there must have been complete indicators to show the strength of the two variables as well as the addition of some other concept or even variable in the course of research work. The treatment must have been conducted within the framework of different environments. In the same way, there could be making up of new population to determine sampling. During this, the theta or other formulae could be extracted from the concept of estimation in order to make the findings more valid and reliable. The comparison of two different samples as well as two different environments may give new dimension to the research work. The participants might be acclimatized and the details could be written in the research, so that the hydrotherapeutic treatment could be presented as the most effective way of treatment of different kinds of diseases. References Doby, John T. 1977. Methods of Social research Stacey, Margaret. 1969. Research Methodology Blalock, Hurburt. 1972. Social Statistics Goode, William Josiah & Hatt, Paul Kitchener. 1952 Social Statistics Read More