Does TV Increase Violence among Children and Teenagers - Annotated Bibliography Example

?Does TV Increase Violence among Children and Teenagers: An Annotated Bibliography Congressional Testimony. STEREOTYPES AND DEGRADING IMAGES:STRAUSS ZELNICK. Federal Document Clearing House, , 25 Sep. 2007. eLibrary. Web. 17 Feb. 2011. The source discusses the different stereotypes and degrading images that are portrayed on television. Some of the media is said to have a harmful impact on children. The document discusses whether or not TV influences others or TV shows influence events that take place for reasons other than TV persuasion. The article also focuses on the responsibility of media companies. The document suggest that media companies take responsibilities of making sure the media does not get into the wrong hands of a child who should not be viewing the media. The document uses statistics strongly to prove that violence is not related to media such as violence on Television. The statistics show that as violence in media becomes more popular, homicide rates go down. Video Games are a big factor for the way violence is portrayed in media. The video game Grand Theft Auto San Andreas is profiled in the document. The video game shows scenes of violence, sexuality, drug use and even racial comments. The document seems to argument strongly that violent media does not influence violent behavior in children and teen youth. There are mainly statistics that favor the chosen argument. The article stresses the need to protect children and teens from weapons and other violent objects. Many media sources claim to market their products to an age group that is appropriate for the game. The arguments presented in the document are by far favorable to the fact that violent media is not subject to children, but many can argue the fact.  Anonymous. "Is exposure to media violence a public-health risk?." Lancet 9619(2008):1137. eLibrary. Web. 17 Feb. 2011. This article focuses on the danger of violent images and games. Some games show constant violence. The violence shown is a harmful exposure to children and teens. Children and young teens can be traumatized by the images of killing and violence. It is obvious that the article is suggesting that there is some sort of a regulation put on the violence that is portrayed in the media. The need for a regulation is important to minimize the amount of violence young children see. The article focuses on the importance that the television and the internet can give educational material. Aside from being able to provide educational material, there are also dangerous exposures to violent images and events. The images that are able to be viewed on the internet can have devastating affects on a child. The focus on this is to explain how important it is to regulate what children and teens are able to view in the media. The exposure is not just a risk for children and teens. The general public is at risk for health issues from all of these violent images. The article is from the United Kingdom and often references the United States. This reference to the United States explains how the violence is highly publicized more than in other countries. The article is summed up by stating that there really is no way to place blame on a certain violent media. However, it is suggested that more studies need to be performed to link violent media with violent behavior. MICHAEL PAUL WILLIAMS. "DANGEROUS MESSAGES? MEDIA VIOLENCE ABOUNDS; SO DOES DEBATE ON ITS EFFECTS." Richmond Times-Dispatch. 13 Oct. 1994: A-1. eLibrary. Web. 17 Feb. 2011. The facts recognized in the document are quite alarming. Facts show that the average child may witness 8,000- 100,000 murders just from watching television. For many that amount is way too much and shows that there is a large need for change. These facts do not also factor in other media such as games and the internet. The harmful effects that these images have on children can change the way the children act dramatically. The debate also expresses the type of children that are likely going to be viewing the violent media. It is stated that children experiencing the violent media will be seeing some sort of real life violent media at home. This is so since the parents likely do not monitor what the children are viewing. The opinions expressed in the debate are passionate toward the side that is favored. It is suggested in the debate that a man shielded his son’s eyes because of the violence in a movie. Many that share the same concern state that the violence is all around and is a sign of the times. A radio station Magic 99 FM explains that they are supposed to play all songs that are popular. Although this is their job they refused to play some songs that are to violent are include too many sexual gestures. A suggestion suggests that as long as the violence sells, those able to make a profit will continue to sell. A director of a Grace House suggests that it is time for presidents and those in charge to gain a type of social conscience. By Amanda Paulson Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor. "TV violence tough to curb despite FCC's new plea." Christian Science Monitor. 30 Apr. 2007: 2. eLibrary. Web. 17 Feb. 2011. The article is by a staff writer for The Christian Science Monitor. The article hopes that the government will soon take action for the violence that is legally allowed to be portrayed in the media. Since the government regulates so many other aspects in the lives of the public, they should regulate the negative images. It is suggested that congress decide to limit the amount of violence that is shown during prime time hours. Doing this could limit the amount of violence that children and teens are subject to seeing. In the article the obstacles that are associated with presenting the bill to limit violence are going to be tough to achieve. The article suggests that it will be hard to distinguish between different types of violence. The statistics in the article prove that there has been a 75% increase in violent crimes during prime time television since 1998. The violence portrayed during prime time hours in the news is also an issue. If television shows are not able to show and discuss violence, why should the news be able to. This point is an important argument when trying to regulate violence during prime time hours. The article thoroughly discusses the role that the FCC has on regulating violence that is shown on Television. Those wanting to stop violence in the media need to contact the FCC and push for a harsher regulation. This is important because there is not much available for parents when it comes for completely blocking violence in the media. Lavers, Daphne. "Media violence: Ugly and getting uglier." World & I. 01 Mar. 2002: 68. eLibrary. Web. 17 Feb. 2011. This article focuses on how media is already ugly but is continuing to get uglier. The title alone expresses the side that the article is on. The writer is obviously unhappy with the amount of violence that the youth is allowed to see on television. In the United States and Canada, the violence rates have gone up by half in the past 10 to 15 years since violence has been shown in the media. This is proof that allowing children to see violent images does have an impact on their decisions later in life. The evidence in the article is very strong. The article directly relates women in the media associated with violence and the amount of crimes associated with women. Violent crimes associated with women have risen by 93 percent. That is a huge number and a good indicator that violence in the media has a big influence on everyday life. The article has a focus on the way that violent media has replaced parental figures and educators. The article discusses how every new season of television series amps up the violence and sexual content more and more. If no one stops this, who knows what the images seen on TV can amount to. Soon enough, there will be no limits and no system in place to determine the limit of content. In the article it is discussed that many are shamed because of the television producers that continue to show these violent and sexual acts to over ten million children. The numbers and statistics in this article are important for one wanting to state how violence on television is influential toward children and even adults. Hurst, Marianne D. "Researchers Target Impact of Television Violence." Education Week. 17 Nov. 2004: 8. eLibrary. Web. 17 Feb. 2011. The article by Marianne Hurst is a different perspective on violence and television. The article expresses the need to not just stop the violence but also to help children distinguish between what is real and what is not. Distinguishing between the real and the portrayed violence can help children possibly make better decisions when it comes to violence. This is an important view on violence in the media. It is an actual solution to the given issue. The workshop called, “taking charge of your TV”, was developed by a local PTA. This development was from the result of many violent acts that have been occurring. The article seems to be very passionate about talking with children about the violence that they see rather than trying to hide it. This type of violence prevention in children allows for children to feel they are more able to talk about things that are being portrayed in the media. Children can then be able to understand that the violence is wrong and is only portrayed and not real. The article brings up the subject on cartoon violence rather than duplicated violence. Parents often forget about cartoons since they are supposed to be for children. Often many of the cartoons are full of violence. The opinions of those in the article are strong and likely based upon facts. The opinion of a man in the article states that 10% of violence can be blamed on media. This is a strong opinion but is likely legitimate. Earles, K A; Alexander, Randell; Johnson, Melba; Liverpool, Joan; McGhee, Melissa. "Media influences on children and adolescents: Violence and sex." Journal of the National Medical Association 9(2002):797. eLibrary. Web. 17 Feb. 2011 Some of the focus of this article is to express the needs for pediatricians and psychologist to question the amount of media that is in the child or teens life. This questioning could directly link violence in the media with real life violence. Some of the violence described is violence that has happened or keeps showing events of the violence that has happened. This mainly targets internet and news sites. These sites continue to show the violent events and are not rated like other television shows. This is a problem since the violence is more often worst then made up violence. The data shown in the article appears to be very accurate in its findings. Many of the facts from the article are credible and come from recent research performed by physicians and psychologist. It is apparent that violence in the media affects children and teens. When a child is constantly shown something negative, the outcome of the negative images will not portray a healthy outcome. If the amount of violence that is portrayed can be minimized it is likely that the amount of violence seen will be lessened. The way the article points out the use of stereotypes gives children a false sense of how men and women should be portrayed. The portraying of men and woman in a violent setting does not lead to a promising future. Children should view parent figures in a positive manner. The recommendations shown in the article should be followed through as a plan to prevent further influences from violence. Fraracci, Lauren. "Television: Teacher of violence." Social Studies Review. 01 Apr. 2002: 77. eLibrary. Web. 17 Feb. 2011. Television is portrayed as a teacher of violence in the social review by Fraracci Lauren. Since many children are in front of the TV every day, the children are able to learn from the things that are seen on TV. Many of the things learned are violent and not for the eyes of a young child. In the review it is discussed how television potentially teaches children how to be violent. Teaching children violence through media is not what television was likely meant to do. The article explains how the growth of television in the home has been a contributor to how much children are seeing the violence on TV. It is interesting how the article puts blame on parents. The blame is placed on parents by stating that parents use the television as an easy way to entertain kids. This statement may be very true. It is also discussed that children may watch so much TV that they begin to think what they see on television is true. The suggestions in the article are a good topic for discussion. Parents are the ones who need to be responsible and control the things that the child watches on television. This maybe so since children often cannot make decision on their own. When the parents are more involved in the Childs life and are more focused on the child, many children would not even know of the violent images that are shown in the media. Parents can stop children from being able to view violence on TV. Albiniak, Paige. "Violent media, violent kids?." Broadcasting & Cable. 31 Jul. 2000: 14. eLibrary. Web. 17 Feb. 2011. In the article four major health groups are reviewed. Their views are expressed in ways that are not favorable to television show producers. The views are strong toward the fact that violence in media is to blame for encouraging children to be violent. Media may be the only place that a child will ever see the type of violent images. If the child was kept away from the negative events that are portrayed on TV it would be better for the child. The AMA suggests that these violent images will be carried with the child for the rest of the Childs life. Once a child views a negative image they remember the negative image and take that with them for years to come. The affects of violence on children are compared to the affects of tobacco and children. Children see others using cigarettes and become curious about them. This can also be said about violence. When a child is constantly shown violence like the violence shown in the media, the child will become curious about the violence. The article offered much insight as to how violence can affect children. The way children are affected is somewhat sickening. It is sickening to the point that many in charge are allowing this type of things to go one without any fault. The future outcomes shown in the article are eye opening and a reality as to what can actually happen from too much violent exposure. Like many articles, the article discusses that parents can prevent the way children view the violence. Jipguep, Marie-Claude; Sanders-Phillips, Kathy. "The Context of Violence for Children of Color: Violence in the Community and in the Media." Journal of Negro Education 4(2003):379. eLibrary. Web. 17 Feb. 2011 This article focused on the way violence in the media affects a given race and not just children in general. Although children of every race can view violence in the media, this is likely more common in households that contain children of color. The topics in the text describe the importance of low income children of color and various self esteem issues. Low income housing usually houses parents that are likely to not monitor what their children are watching. Since low income communities typically have more violence. The children are likely to see more violence at home and in the media. The constant viewing of this violent behavior is likely to have long term affects. Even in the 1920’s there were issues of media influence on children. The influences of concern have gone from kissing and romantic scenes to torture and hate. The change in media is an alarm for many as the actual affects have not been fully examined. The definitions of violence discussed in the article help to give a better understanding as to what the author is actually discussion. After reading the text it is certain that the author is aiming at violence in general and it affects on all children especially children of color. This article provides important information but violence in the media cannot really be linked to a certain race. Reviewing the article creates an obvious image that media influences are not the only influence of violence in children’s lives. Family life is a major contributor to the violence a child may see. Read More