Primary Differences between Carthage and Rome - Essay Example

History Primary Differences between Carthage and Rome There are fundamental differences between the Carthage and Rome, which relate to the arrangement in terms of the general forms; Rome had a different constitution in regard to war of the Hannibal, whereby Roman constitution was considered better than Carthaginian constitution (Polybius, 67). In this case, the government and operations had three successive periods, which entailed of growth, perfection and decay. Moreover, during the period of perfection, there was a considerable strength depicted and this became a distinction between Carthage and Rome. Therefore, this section of the paper will focus on exploring the difference between Carthage and Rome, which contributed to the Romans becoming more successful than the Carthaginians. The other difference relates to the duration taken to attain a high point of vigor, which was referred to as the perfection stage. In this case, the Carthage was able to reach the stage before Rome; through they proceeded to decay stage at the same time. Therefore, this implies that Carthage spent a longer period in perfection stage compared to Rome. Nevertheless, Rome achieved more in perfection stage compared to the Carthage since they managed to raise their constitution unlike Carthage; thus, this was establishing a difference in relation to achievements in the stage. Consequently, people in Carthage republic had a greater sway in their deliberations while the Romans had a senate, thus in Carthage the measures depended on the multitudes, while in Rome, the measures depended on the prominent citizens. Therefore, in Rome, there was a substantial force related to the conducting their affairs, through there were instances where this led to losses and dangerous. Nevertheless, the force in Rome, involved in the process of undertaking their affairs led to superiority in war compared to Carthage since had wisdom gathered from their counsels. The other difference between the Romans and Carthaginians relates to military science, whereby Carthaginians were more skillful in managing the naval war, In fact, Carthaginians were known to acquire information from their ancestors, and they exercised during the maritime dealings. However, the Romans had more superiority in numerous things related to the establishment of disciplines and their armies. In fact, these disciplines were observed by the chief and other objects of care that were neglected by Carthaginians. Nevertheless, the Carthaginians bestowed insignificant attention upon the cavalry, and it establishes the difference that between the two republics. In addition, the Romans employed armies that were composed of citizens and people in their country while Carthaginians used foreign mercenaries; thus, making the Roman government be more preferred that Carthaginians. The other difference relates to the confidence of both Romans and Carthaginians, whereby the Romans entrusted their confidence on their own bravery and help of their friends while Carthaginians had a lot of confidence on the preservation of liberty in care of their venal troops. Romans had a conviction that those who were defeated had the ability to renew their war while Carthaginians a believed that armies are repaired through many difficulties. Nevertheless, the Romans appeared to be inferior to Carthaginians, but their persistence was derived through a spirit of becoming superior to their enemies in order to protect their children and women. In fact, despite the lack of skills and expertise in naval knowledge, the Romans were able to achieve their war objectives due to their bravery. 2. Developments Described in these Readings that Undermines the Medieval World and Lay the Foundations for the Modern World Some of the developments described in the readings that seem to undermine the mediaeval world are the tribulation experienced by Anon after deliverance of the King of Navarre. These tribulations were experienced in the monarchy of France in places such as in Laonnois, the river of Marne and Beauvoisin, and this was a period attributed to villages lacking leaders, whereby they were gathered in Beauvoisin (Froissart, 1). Moreover, there was a shame on the realm attributed to destruction of immense wealth since the knights had gathered together with no counsel and armor. In fact, their houses were attacked, and their wives and children were killed. Another instance involved a knight whose wife and daughter were raped while he was watching; they were all killed and the castle burnt down. In this case, these are some of the acts described in the reading occurred during the Medieval World, and they are undermining the era. Therefore, this section of the paper will focus on describing various developments, which occurred during the Medieval World that undermines that appear to be undermining, but they initiated the process of modernization. On the other hand, this development in the Medieval World were taken as a foundation for the modern world since it led to the diversion to other good houses and there was multiplication of six thousand while men fled and took their families with them. In addition, there were other shameful acts did during the Medieval World, and mischief was praised with their masters. Some of the other cases indicated in the readings are the horrible actions, which were done to ladies and damsels, whereby they knight was killed, and his body was roasted in the midst of these ladies his wife and children. Afterwards, they were enforced to eat off the roasted body, and they would be dying an evil death to women and her children. Foundations of modern world were initiated by destruction of Brent in Beauvoisin, whereby well-built houses were constructed in Amiens and Montdidier for knights and squires. There was another initiative that was setting pace to a modern world is the relocation of the knights and squires in the country to other places such as Brie. In fact, these movements were fostering a form of interaction among people from different parts of the world that could facilitate modernization process. Nevertheless, there were people in Paris, Noyon and Soissons who were not courteous, and this was attributed to the land of Coucy in Valois and other parts of Laon and Nyon. Therefore, despite the shameful acts attributed to Medieval World, they acts influenced the decision that initiated the process of modernization. Works Cited Froissart, Jean. The Medieval World (c. 476 – c. 1450) From the Fall of Rome to the Eve of the Reformation: Chronicles (Late 14th century). 199-205, Available at http://cuwhist.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/hist103reader3-medieval-world.pdf[Accessed on December 5 2012]  Polybius. The Medieval World (c. 476 – c.1450) From the fall of Rome to the Eve of the Reformation. 62-72 Available at: http://cuwhist.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/hist103reader2-classical-world.pdf [Accessed on December 5 2012] Read More