The Greek and the Persians War - Annotated Bibliography Example

The Old Version of the 300 Movie Made In the 1960's Cartledge, Paul. “The Spartans”. Athens: Pan Books, 2003.Print The author in this book takes an in-depth look at Sparta a state in Greece that was known for its prowess in different battles all over the world. The author begins the book by outlining it political organization. It had a strong political organization that helped in coordination of different wars. Sparta unlike Athena believed in total subjugation of other communities. According to Cartledge, Sparta was the strongest state in Greece due to the military organization it had. The warriors believed that dying for the sake of their community was a sign of heroism, they therefore did not care losing there lives as long as it was for the good of their state. This state together with Athena fought against the Persians in a war called Greco-Persian. The author points out how the two states appointed a leader who would lead them to this war by the name Leonidas .Sparta later became great enemies with the Athens when they fought in battle entitle Peloponnesian it was not an easy battle for Sparta during to the strong military organization Athens had. This war surrendered Athens powerless and had a great impact on its economy. The author more accurately captures the version of war impact when hr define how the Spartan achieved this unending victory due to the uniqueness of their social structure and strong laws that guided all operations in Sparta. The constitution promoted harmony among the warriors and the fellow citizens who had full or total rights to the state. The Spartan society was divided in different classes. There were freed men and also slaves who were obtained from different battles. The function of these slaves was to offer entertainment services to Spartans. Different training sessions were offered to the warriors where fighting skills were encouraged. Recruitment of warriors was done through appointment of the strong individuals in the community. Cartledge argues that state was unique compared to other states in the world in the sense that, it highly regarded women more than men. Greene, Peter. “Ground warfare: an international encyclopedia, Volume 1”. New York: ABC-CLIO, 2002.print Peter Green was a Briton who mainly focused on writing about different bibliographies on the different historical issues his notable work was on the Greco Persian war. In his work Green tries to explain the different routes that were used by warriors when fighting. Another focus of Green is how Athens formulated and maintained democracy in its state expounding more on the rise and the fall of the Persian Empire. Greene’s work is quite dramatic compared to the works of his fellow historians. His narrations are full of humor hence bringing out a better understanding of what happened during the battle between the Persians and the Greeks. Burn, Andrew Robert. “Persia and the Greeks: the defence of the West”. Chicago: Stanford University Press, 2000.print Greco Persian war came about due to different conflicts between a state in the Hellenic world and the Persian Empire. According to Burn, the main conflict arose due to the control of Ionia. Every state wanted to rule over it therefore the Persians gave that duty to a tyrant who pose a great threat to the Greeks. If this was not enough Persia took control of Naxos, this called for alarm in the different states of Greece. The author explains how the Greeks decided to rebel against the Persians calling upon Ionian war. While attempting to further expand on the scope of this book Burn gives an example of another state that was highly against this conquest Eritrea and Athena, and how they joined hands in fighting against the Persia .According to Burn this action caused the Persian king to swear revenge against these two states, and hence organized war against the Athenians and Eritrea; this war saw the suffering of the Ionians. The author dedicates a significance portion of his work to adequately explain the proceedings of the war; he illustrates how Persians never managed to defeat Eritrea for they were defeated and how the Persians they give up. The author specifically identifies the King who still had interest in attacking Greece, after his death this responsibility of conquering Greece was left in the hands of his son. In attempt to expound on the characteristic of old version of war, the author depicts how the Persian had an endless interest to conquer Greece. Indeed, this book is very useful as a source of scholarly legal literature concerning war and impacts of war, it worth noting when the Persians tried another battle against the Greeks they were defeated. This defeat led to great lose among the Persians states. There property was destroyed and there soldiers killed a fact that made them even weaker. Another war was organized by the Greeks with an aim of putting a stop to invasion by the Persians. They were interested in rendering Persia completely powerless. Athens joined together with Greece coming up with a campaign that was meant to vote against Persians rule over Ionia. They succeeded where Ionia was later declared as a free state free from the Oppression of the Persians. Although written mostly in a legal prose, it can quite easily be understood by even scholars, Burn Considers history has it that the enormous wars were put to a stop though reconciliation of the Persians and the Athenians. Burn then offers evidence how they reconciled , this was realized through signing of a peaceful treaty. This treaty was referred to as Peace of callas. It helped in promoting harmonious living between Persians and Athens. The friction that existed due to Ionia came to a stop. They could now carry out trade together. The strategies Burn suggests make an interesting reading, and are bound to raise some controversies regarding their moral ground; According to him Greeks success is attributed to its organization in the warfare’s. Greeks were mostly organized in troupes unlike the Persians who had simple weapons. Greeks population was large enough to provide enough warriors. Spartans influence played an integral part in the success of the Greeks of which is a subject of discussion. Bradford, Ernle. “Thermopylae: the battle for the Wes”t. New York: Da Capo Press, 2004. Battle of Thermopylae The author in this particular book provides a background and elaboration on the Battle. The author believes this battle was organized between the Greek and the Persians. The main coordinates of this war were King Leonard and xerxes. The author also discusses how the battle occurred this battle occurred within the first few days of Persian invasion to the Greeks. Persians were fully prepared to conquer and defeat Greece. The term Thermopylae means the hot gates. The author outlines how the Greeks came up with different methods through which they could defeat the Persians one being blocking Persian troupes so that they could not pass Thermopylae. The author cite how in war, only specific routes have to be employed- the Persians had only one route they could use in the battle. . The article offers an insightful look into the essence of corporations predicting possible, unfortunately the Persians were informed about the plans that the Greeks had, therefore come up with better strategies through which they could fight against the Greeks. The author presupposes that counter strategy is the best defense, in the context Leonard was very scared of the strategies put in place by the Persians therefore organized his soldiers in different groups. The Persians seemed strong and therefore defeated the Greeks. . However, according to the author, this trend has been observed to be rapidly changing especially on how information was delivered, this book elaborates on how war triggers immigration for instance Athenians were forced to evacuate from salamis after the defeat. On learning this, the Persians occupied the evacuated region. The author’s arguments are also well organized in the book, which makes it an easy and interesting read to general readers as well as students and teachers. Moreover, the author emphasizes on the need to develop a nation. He gives suggestions that are important for the development of a nation; it calls for patriotism for a nation to succeed in any battle. Members of a nation have to love there nation and be ready to die for their nation. Good training of soldiers is another element necessary in the success of any battle. Good training provides the warriors with necessary skills to use in fighting, this training also helps in giving the warriors confidence. The warriors are to be fully armed with necessary equipments to use in attacking their enemies. George, William. “A history of Sparta”. Indiana: Duckworth, 2008.print History of the Sparta In this book, the author takes a deep analysis and describes the end of the state by the name Sparta a Greek state that was well known for its prowess in different war expeditions. The author, in addition, discusses extend to which the general success was clearly shown during the Persian wars when it defeated the Persians. The author explores how the Greek leader had indeed pinpointed out this state as the best in Greece. Unfortunately this fame came to an end when Sparta falsely accused Athena of secretly invading Sparta after occurrence of an earth quake. It received high recognition after the defeat of the Athens. After a period of time this state could not maintain its supremacy when it was defeated in a battle called Leuctra. Due to this failure the king ordered that Sparta be dissolved. This book is an invaluable scholarly resource to both students. The organization and prose of the book are also simple enough for the general reader to grasp the argument of the author Read More