StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

American Invasion on Iraq - Essay Example

Summary
The paper "American Invasion on Iraq" states that Many Americans themselves hold negative views for the Iraq war suggesting that this war was an unnecessary step. Still, some of America’s own claims are also substantial like cracking down on the intense terrorism activities that happened in Iraq…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
American Invasion on Iraq
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "American Invasion on Iraq"

Issue paper: American invasion on Iraq 03 December, [Course name and code] 03 December, 2010. American occupation on Iraq: The American occupation of Iraq is one of the hottest debated issues of the present age. It is undoubtedly a highly controversial issue and the opinions related to it vary greatly from person to person. Iraq was occupied by the Americans with the purpose of ensuring peace, progress, and modernity there and rescuing the public of Iraq from heavy influence exercised by the rigid and exacting government. Even with the daily media reports announcing every day about the loss of many American soldiers’ lives and myriad atrocities affecting the Iraqi people, the Americans still have varying opinions about the American invasion. Though America presented many justifiable reasons for invading Iraq in an order to suppress the expected resistance and gain general approval from the world, it is reported now that the deteriorating condition of Iraq has imposed such a heavy burden on the economy of America that millions of families are getting badly affected owing to this purposeless war. The Iraqi people did and are still facing the worst consequences of the war that was fought for eradicating Al-Qaeda from Iraq. The Al-Qaeda terrorists who were reportedly in action in Iraq have been somewhat suppressed, but they are still at large reportedly. Though it is said that Iraq war has been fought at phenomenal financial, social and humanitarian costs to US, some Americans still claim that this war has its own benefits that have also advantaged America thus siding by the Rumsfeld’s claims. Those few advantages include less terrorist attacks that were expected from Al-Qaeda terrorists. It is identified by Rumsfeld (cited in Procon.org) that before the war, Iraq had definite connections with the terrorist group Al-Qaeda, and these connections strengthened and rose to prominence after 1998. It is believed by a small percentage of Americans that Iraq, indeed, had weapons of mass destruction that were highly sought by the terrorists who intended to attack major cities in America. Some Americans even discard the view that US invasion has created poverty and other social imbalances in Iraq after this war. Recent viewpoint of the American people based on nationwide polling shows that majority of the people are against this war and think that this has merely resulted in heavy financial crisis and innumerable other problems for America. (Harris and Muste) identify that “56 percent people in survey say that Iraq war was a mistake.” Many public speakers say that with growing skepticism in the American public about the aims and purpose of this war, it would not be an overstatement if it is said that this war has been initiated and fought at too great a humanitarian cost to be considered worthwhile by the Americans. Many Americans also claim that owing to the huge economic and financial burden resulting from the Iraq war, they themselves have to pay for the extra expenses of the war by being ordered to pay heavy taxes by the Government. It is identified in an article by (Chelala) that Iraqi people think that this war has initiated destructive humanitarian consequences that have become a major worrisome issue for Iraq at the present and that are also strengthening with every passing day. It is a fact that Iraqi people have suffered badly from the American invasion on their country. The use of chemicals by the American troops, which was initially heavily denied, has become a profound fact now and it is claimed by the US military itself that white phosphorus has been used as an explosive chemical repeatedly during the war, which has created a deplorable and bloodcurdling unhygienic condition in many areas of Iraq. Authentic research reports identify that native Iraqi doctors have been overwhelmed and exasperated since a while due to the soaring number of infants born with congenital mental and physical impairments. According to (Mouammar), some native doctors even suggest that every kind of imaginable toxic pollutant has been used in some particular areas of Iraq after the ruthless American invasion. Infant mortality and cancer rates have so dramatically increased in some particular cities of Iraq that they have far exceeded those reported by the survivors of the historical Heroshima and Nagasaki incident in Japan. According to the Iraqi people, the rate of the congenital birth defects have insanely increased in Iraq after the war. Almost all the Iraqi people say that the unjustifiable and untimely decision of America to invade Iraq has led them to put up with the “worse than imagined” consequences that are only strengthening with every passing day. Research reports suggest that there is also not a good opinion about the Iraq war by many people around the world. That is the reason, many powerful countries did not heavily finance this war and America itself, had to bear most of the finances and is still under profound economic burden. (Ratner, Green, and Olshansky 8) have comprehensively explained the real reason of the Iraq war that directly goes in agreement with what the world at large thinks about this war. Critics around the world claim that the apparent claims of America to protect the freedom and civil rights of the Iraqi people were mostly based on self-interests actually. The world thinks that this war was mainly initiated as means to acquire control on the vast oil reserves of Iraq. It is emphasized by (Ratner et al. 8) that the deeper reason of the US invasion on Iraq is quite different from the reasons presented before the war for the satisfaction of the rest of the world. It is argued that the real reason is heavily obscured and needs to be thoroughly contemplated for realizing the actual aims of then American government. It is identified by (Holt) that “Iraq has 115 billion barrels of known oil reserves that are more than five times the total in the United States.” The major actual reason for invading Iraq was consolidating the America’s power by controlling the vast oil reserves that are the pride of Iraq’s nation. (Philips, cited in Moyers and Winship) has claimed that those people who are in power in America would do anything to gain access to the precious oil reserves of Iraq without considering the lives of many Iraqi people or the earth, itself. Many unjustifiable allegations like creation of weapons of mass destruction are thoroughly analyzed after the war in different reports by various people around the world, and almost every single report has identified that the fake allegations were just used as temporary means of strengthening the US world domination by exercising a control on Iraq’s enviable oil reserves. This war is deemed as an utterly unnecessary and illegal action by the world for securing America’s freedom and power through invading a defenseless country. This much becomes clear from the above discussion that considering the present restless condition of Iraq, majority of the Iraqi people hold violent views against the American invasion. Myriad accidents are happening there every single day so, the people around the globe are forced to believe that this American invasion has done little to liberate the Iraqi public. Rather, this forceful occupation has resulted in vicious poverty and uncontrollable angry riot according to the Iraqi people. Many Americans themselves hold negative views for the Iraq war suggesting that this war was an unnecessary step. Still, some of the America’s own claims are also substantial like cracking down on the intense terrorism activities that happened in Iraq before America took action. Works cited: Chelala, Cesar. “Worse Than Imagined: Consequences of the Iraq War.” 28 July. 2010. Web. 03 Dec. 2010. Harris, John F., and Muste, Christopher. “56 Percent in Survey Say Iraq War Was a Mistake.” The Washington Post. 21 Dec. 2004. Web. 06 Dec. 2010. < http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A14266-2004Dec20.html> Holt, Jim. “It’s the Oil.” 18 Oct. 2007. Web. 03 Dec. 2010. < http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n20/jim-holt/its-the-oil> Mouammar, Khaled. “Beyond Hiroshima: The Fallujah Cancer Catastrophe.” 20 Sep. 2010. Web. 11 Dec. 2010. Moyers, Bill, and Winship, Micheal. “The Iraq War Was About Oil, All Along.” n.d. Web. 11 Dec. 2010. < http://www.alternet.org/world/90509/?page=2> Procon.org. “Top 10 Pros and Cons: Should the US have attacked Iraq?” 13 Nov. 2009. Web. 03 December. 2010. < http://usiraq.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000668> Ratner, Michael, Green, Jennie, and Olshansky, Barbara. Against War with Iraq: An Anti-War Primer. New York: Open Media, 2003. Print. Read More
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us