Download file to see previous pages...
His tribe is almost becoming extinct (Cherokee, para 2).
The state of Georgia, our neighbors, is forcing us to relinquish our possessions for their benefit. It is unfortunate that also the President of the United States has failed to come to our aid, and has instead ruled in favor of the Georgians. We are left wondering what other rights do we enjoy if we cannot allowed to enjoy living peacefully on our God-given land, the land we inherited from our forefathers (Cherokee, para 4).
The Cherokees have always fulfilled their engagements with the United States and have never reclaimed the portions of sovereignty which was surrendered by the treaties of Hopewell and Holston. Our people have always trusted their country to the guaranty of the United States. If this guaranty fails, we do not have anybody to trust, and we do not even know where to look for protection (Cherokee, para 6)
Out of these atrocities and insecurity, we are pleading to the General Government to offer us new homes, and should also propose to pay the whole expense of the removal and settlement. We hope our pleas will be acted
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The obsession that Andrew Jackson had with the Indian Removal Act somehow stemmed from the fact that the Cherokees themselves were equally relentless in their pursuit for independence. For the Cherokees, “independence” did not mean becoming a separate nation from America but simply a geographical area exempt from the laws of the state of Georgia and those of the federal government (Remini 48).
The indigenous population was progressively reduced in a variety of ways. They were killed directly by firearms during organized wars and individual acts of vigilante violence and were killed indirectly by the addition of European diseases such as smallpox, measles and influenza.
While Jacksonian democracy emerged to promote the rule of the ‘mass’ and the ‘common’ of America, the policies that substantiated Jackson’s regime and their impact apparently became the chief determinants that aid in the assessment of his presidency and the truth of its underlying ethics.
Native American history constitutes a large portion of the American history as studied by different students across the United States and beyond the American continent. Several Native Americans tribes had lived in continental America for centuries; was before the first Europeans first arrived there.
This essay will discuss both strategies, how they overlapped or differed, and how they resulted in different outcomes for the respective tribes.
As an initial matter, the passage of the Indian Removal Bill on May 26, 1830 established a legal mandate to extinguish the title to Indian lands and remove them west of the Mississippi River (Perdue & Green, 1995).
Rather they were displaced by Jackson's enforcers. The Cherokee were brutally forced to walk on foot or rode their horses. Their journey started from the mouth of the Hiawassee in Tennessee across the Cumberland Plateau to McMinnville and then north to Nashville where they crossed the Cumberland River.
Three years ago, in 1833, an illegitimate treaty was signed which agreed to our removal as a people from our lands. The signers of the so-called Treaty of New Echota (“Removal Act “) were not legal representatives of the Cherokee nation and therefore the
One of the controversial policies he is known for is the Indian Removal. The said action started with the Removal Act of 1830 that is aimed to relocate the eastern tribes in the trans-Mississippi West. The said act failed to successfully promote actions related to the said
Greed of revenge, paternalism as well as fear contributed greatly as projected factors leading to removal. Dissenting arguments as well as divergent opinions both from United States and amongst Cherokee
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Jackson and The Cherokee ( The Trail of Tears ) for FREE!