The Bathers of 1887 and Renoirs Anti-Impressionism - Assignment Example

According to White, Renoir’s natural liking of women is a manifestation of creativity; hence, there is no need for Renoir to duplicate a fresco technique in his three-year painting period (107). The Philadelphia women's bath painting depicts Renoir’s innovative power.

• According to the author, how is Renoir’s Bathers “aesthetically incongruous”, with particular respect to the composition and brush-stroke? What are its effect and result? 

The bathers in Philadelphia are aesthetically incongruous because all of the women are doing different things. Two women are resting under a tree near a riverbank while another girl is threatening to splash water on them (White 110). Additionally, the other women are seen wading in the river away from the rest of the women.

• What works of art from his previous paintings of single nudes do Renoir’s Bathers recall?

Renoir recalls the Moulin de la Galette of 1876, the Luncheon of the Boating Party of 1881, and the Reclining Bathers of 1918 (White 111). The works of art were hilarious and novel that the 1887 work of art, the Philadelphia Museum Bathers. The painting borrowed Boucher’s techniques of art in order to make painting interesting.

• According to White, how did the split among the Impressionist group affect Renoir?

The split among the impressionist group led to the development of the Philadelphia Museum Bathers paint. According to White, the impressionists’ split made Renoir develop a new form of painting, which could be appealing to the public (114). In this regard, he took three years to develop the paint.

• According to the author, how may Renoir’s relationship with Aline and the birth of their son affect the Bathers? What proof does White offer? (p. 114)

Renoir’s relationship with Aline and the birth of their son affected the Bathers painting in the sense that the painting took a long time to paint than was anticipated.  The proof of this is the fact that the Philadelphia Museum Bathers painting took three years to complete while the rest of the artiste’s paintings took one year (White 114).

• How did Renoir attempt to seek progress and “irregularity” in his work during 1884-87? (p. 115) 

Renoir sought to get progressively through his unique paintings and originality in painting work. Additionally, his irregularity with regard to the techniques applied also added to his novelty in the artwork. White posits that Renoir’s relationship with great artists like Boucher led to his development, especially in the impressionism development (115).

• According to White, the influence of contemporary writers in the literary and musical world prompted Renoir’s divergence from naturalism towards a new classicism.

Boucher prompted Renoir’s divergence from naturalism to new classicism. The legend positively inspired Renoir to explore classicism from a new perspective (White 118). Additionally, Boucher also gave Renoir insight pertaining to the creativity and novelty in his artwork. The shift from naturalism to classicism exposed Renoir to more techniques of art than he had before.

• How did the influence of tradition impact Renoir’s aesthetic shift during his “sour” period? (Pp. 119-121)

Tradition played a major role in the artistic shift from primitive and archaic art conventions to modern and creative art designs. According to White, the tradition provided Renoir with guidance on the aesthetic mode to adopt in order to make his paintings, especially, the Philadelphia Museum bathers paint (White 121).

• According to the author, why was Renoir vulnerable to the popular taste of the wealthy class? Which artists did Renoir, essentially, look to in an attempt to “sell out”?  How did Renoir try to improve his financial situation?  How did his peers respond to this shift and what was the result? 

Renoir was vulnerable because associated wealth with success. Renoir relied on Boucher in order to establish himself in the world of painting artwork (White 124). Renoir tried to sell his artworks in order to obtain sufficient revenue for his financial obligations. Renoir’s peers criticized Renoir’s shift to classicism; hence, advancing his career.