The China-Japan Conflict over Senkaku and Diaoyu Island - Term Paper Example

The China-Japan Conflict over Senkaku and Diaoyu Island The dispute between China and Japan over the dominion of the Senkaku and Diaoyu islands is seen as a major factor that might lead to war escalation in the two countries. The islands, which borders the two nations are important for economic resources due to the presence of petroleum fuel and fish. Therefore, each country is trying to possess the islands. However, there is are differing view to this query. The occurrence of the conflict connecting the two nations may lead to the fall of their economy. There are many factors that if triggered may influence the decline of the growing economy. The fear of investors, both local and international, on their properties may make them shift to other countries that are safe for investment. International monetary funds and government interests may cut their support of the countries at war leading to decline of the economic growth. Considering these effects, the China and Japan governments may opt for a diplomatic way of solving their disputes rather than opting for a war. The government of China began to take an interest of the island since the discovery of oil was pronounced. China acknowledges that the island is within their boundary. The argument is the continued fisheries that were practised in the earlier years by their forefathers. Their interest though began in the 1970s had been growing, and a counter attack from the Japanese government in 2010 towards the Chinese fishermen proved the escalation of the disputes. The attack by the Japanese soldiers assured that they were in control of the island and ready to take any form of challenge (Pan). When this kind of attack happens, the Chinese government would likely respond. The response to this matter could be worrying. Chinese fishermen are sometime held in custody over the allegation of trespassing and carrying out the fishing activity in the Japan ese territory. For this reason, the Chinese government might respond with war as a way of revenge or in an attempt to rescue them. Therefore, any kind of respond that does not involve the use of a diplomatic action that will lead to a long lasting solution will cause an outbreak of international war. China has been a silent country in terms of conflict with the neighbouring and far countries. The country have not involved itself with other nation’s internal or international conflicts. The nature of the nation has been taken advantage of the rivals. Their leadership of the country is now evolving and coming up with strategies that will ensure a military activities of the country is empowered. The maritime activities of the national army are also undergoing a metamorphosis that will ensure competence in the military actions. Therefore, the country is getting ready to secure its margin. The sketch of the boundary is already complete. The conflict area of on the east of the country that is disputed by the Japanese country is under a strategies formulation by the defence ministry. The East China Sea Air Defence Identification Zone (ECSADIZ) is a marked territory on the east of the country (Harmer). The Senkaku and Diaoyu landmasses are included as the territory of the country under this plan. Therefore, there is a great possibility of a claim of the island by the use of the military action from the government. When the military action is used by the Chinese government, the Japanese government will automatically respond leading to a serious crisis. The result will be an international war engagement between the two countries. In fact, the Japan ese prime minister have refuted the Chinese activity. The Chinese government have said that after the formulation of the zone, no aircrafts from Japan will be allowed to fly over the island’s airspace. The continuous engagement is an indication of the escalation of a conflict that most likely will lead to war. China has been sending its warships to the Senkaku and Diaoyu Island to counter attack any Japanese ship that hinders her citizens from fishing on the bank of the islands. The action is viewed as the most dangerous and may trigger a war between the two nations. The Japanese government has been assured support from the United States government on the military base if China offends them in terms of military action. The long lasting relationship between Japan and U.S. leads to the military support (Lind). The United States government is well known for its engagement in war on the international front. The backing may be very dangerous to China. On the other hand, China and the United States do not have a good relationship. Their action to support Japan may lead to a war as the China may try to show that they too have a great army that can engage into war with the United States (Lind). The delivery of the military ships to the island means that the country is ready for the war. Therefore, the aspect of escalation of conflicts that may lead to the way are vivid, and the action may as well begin in the near future. After the 2010 capturing of the Chinese fishermen, there have been a continuous deterioration of the Sino-Japan ese relationship (Pan). The protests in the Chinese major cities over the capturing of the Chinese have led to the worsened relationship even in trade between the two countries. The Chinese government have cut its supply of the raw material to Japan and also disallowed an import from Japan. Japanese businessmen in the Northern Province have also been arrested. The response to an approaching war is thus the formation of alliances from the neighbouring countries. Each of the two countries is looking for a special support from the neighbouring countries. The support is mainly based on the military resources such as arms and human personnel. Japanese claims that the alleged fishermen from China were exploring for oil resources while the Chinese government claims that they were mere fishermen. Therefore, the two countries are aiming at outdoing each other, and a possible war may eventually outbreak. On the other hand, Japan and China should not engage into war over the disputed island. There are various avenues that can be followed to achieve the accreditation of the disputed island than just moving to the war. The war may bring a lot of harms to both countries and to the international communities who engages into the war either directly or indirectly. The need of a peaceful engagement is to reduce the damage that can occur from the chaos. The international community should rather engage in solving the dispute peacefully rather than supporting the different sides in the case of the war. The war will not solve the dispute as each side will move on the means of owning the piece of land in the future. Rather, a diplomatic solution needs to be cultivated to ensure that a lasting solution is achieved. The action will involve some sacrifices of personal interests from the two countries. The conflict between China and Japan may lead to the economic and political downfall that will not be meaningful. China is the prime lenders of the U. S. (Gao). The United States, on the other hand, would be willing to support Japan as a way of improving ties that were broken during the World War II. Their option to support Japan will, therefore, mean a decline of the financial support from China. When the economy of the United States of America goes on the wire, most of the countries that depend on the nation may collapse since they will not find the financial and political support from the country. Therefore, the solution to the ownership of the island would better follow a meaningful way of ending the conflict instead using war. China is one of the highest consumer of the United States of America automobiles. Most of the automobile companies such as Ford have a lot of benefits from the majority of Chinese consumers. Moreover, most of the United States of America consumers usually outsources their jobs in the country. The final products that are produced by the United States of America, therefore, reaches the market at a much lower prices resulting from the low labour cost from China. Low cost of production thereby leads to low cost of the product hence the commodity becomes attractive in the international market. In the case of an outbreak of the war, the United States of America will lose the advantage of Chinese trade relationship and their business will be highly affected. The ripple effect of a poor relationship will be established in the country’s economic performance resulting to people’s lower standards of living. The conflict between China and Japan over the ownership of the island will also affect the economic performance of the two states (Gao). Since the two nations play a chief role in their economic development, the battle will result to a disturbance of the two economies. Private and public companies of China have been established in Japan , and Japanese traders have established their premises in China. Therefore, the two countries enjoys a mutual trading relationship that need not be disturbed by any form of conflict (Lee). When a conflict occurs, the businessmen will be highly affected. The reciprocated relationship will be shattered leading to the suffering of their citizens. Countries that depend on the economic units of both Japan and China will also be affected. For example, India depends on China and Japan in running its economy. When a conflict occurs, India will not be able to side with one side. Therefore, its support on the economic sector will be cut, and the country will be affected. India and other countries will thus pledge for a peaceful coexistence and a diplomatic resolution in establishing the true owner of the islands. Moreover, the occurrence of the war will lead to the political instability of the three nations, China, Japan and the U. S. of America. In the case of the conflict, Japan will expect the United States of America to support them. The United States of America will have a hard time in pronouncing such a decision (Gao). The reason is that supporting Japan will mean a broken tie with China, their major financial source. If not supported, Japan will revive its rivalry concerning the historical World War II American bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The political credibility of the United States of America will, therefore, be on the scale (Lind). Japan has in the recent years been able to establish and produce powerful nuclear plants and may retaliate the action to their old foes. The decision to take a side in the battle will, therefore, be dangerous to the U.S. The political stability between China and Japan will also be tested as the countries are expected to have a peaceful co-existence in order to establish their vision on economic growth and prosperity. Japan and China need to resolve the chaos regarding the ownership of the landmasses in a calm way. The rising temperatures on the possible actions between the two countries need immediate interventions. The military action may lead to the loss of precious lives of the harmless citizens. The countries will also suffer from the broken good relationship that has prevailed from many years. Since many nations depend on the economy of the two states, a ripple effect of the war will be experienced in many other nations. The battle should, therefore, not occur at all cost (Lind). There are numerous avenues that can be used to establish a solution. The best way engage the united nation in elaborating the boundaries that were established by their colonies. The treaties that were signed should also be utilised to resolve the dispute. The united nation should also impose sanctions on both countries if there is any attempt to inaugurate the war. People’s lives and properties should be the foremost consideration in any government attempt. An economic tie between the two countries also needs to be reviewed in establishing a long lasting peaceful deals. Works Cited Gao, Victor. “Viewpoints: How serious are China-Japan tensions?” BBC News, BBC. 08 Feb 2013. 08 December 2014. Harmer, Stephen. "Forbes. Forbes Magazine." 21 August 2014. China De-Escalating The Senkaku/Diaoyu Crisis, But Will Abe Respond? web. 08 December 2014. Lee, Joyman. “Senkaku/Diaoyu: Islands of Conflict.” History Today. Historytoday.com. May 2011. Web. 08 December 2014. Lind, Michael. "The Cost of Free Trade. American Prospect." Academic search complete (2011): Lind, Michael. “The Cost of Free Trade.” American Prospect. 22. 10 (2011): 52-57. Academic search complete. Web. 19 Nov. 2014. web. Pan, Zhongqi. "Sino-Japan ese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: The Pending Controversy from the Chinese Perspective." Pan, Zhongqi. "Sino-Japan ese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: ThJournal of Chinese Political Science (2007): 71-92. Print. Read More