Week16 discussion - Assignment Example

Everything changed on September 9/11 due to the involvement of the conservative movement in United Sates. First, in 2003,President Bush administration foreign policy changed dramatically, particularly when the management opted to go to war in Iraq. The conservative movement that included thoughtful intellectuals and declared their invasion plan for Iraq with the intention of establishing Iraq as a democratic nation. Furthermore, the Middle East was set to remark thriving democracies. The 9/11 events changed the conservative foreign policy dramatically.

The administration of Bush was oriented again in order to give an opportunity for the neoconservatives to make them more powerful over the foreign policy. Bush’s policy doctrines led to long-term interventions in Iraq in 2003 and correspondingly Afghanistan in the year 2001, and are still ongoing. Bush promised cmpassionate conservatism as far as the domestic front was concerned. He also vowed to improve and enhance education, as well as increase financial aid to undeveloped continents such as African (Faragher et al.,28-267) A number of diplomats view the doctrine of President Bust entitled “ preventuve war” was employed during the invasion of Iraq in 2003 (Kashmir, pp124-178).

However, the doctrine has a rooted intellectual history of conservative movement regarding the foreign policy. The 9/11 event did not change the traditional desires concerning the offensive foreign policy. Moreover, the development improved the judiciousness of distress, and a narrow window designated for action, that was the epitome of conservative rollback’s advocacy of the course of the cold war period. For instance, Burnham pointed out how hard it was to see the definition of trying and containing.

Nevertheless, Bush opposed the possibility of containment due to mass destruction weapons from the unbalanced dictators’ hands (Faragher et al. pp125-289).President Bush said that the danger they were facing from Iraq was significant while authorizing the Iraqi war in October 2002. Consequently, President Bush spelled out that there was no need to wait for the threat to materialize since the danger Iraqi was facing was gradually becoming worse. Within the year 2002, Bush added that the terror war relied on the self-protective technique (Hamm, pp245-289).

The 9/11 event never changes the thinking of conservative foreign policy; instead, it alters the political environment that it functioned. With the departure of President Bush from the White House or the debacle of Iraq, there has never been a rollback impulse retreat (Kashmir, pp124-178). Certain individuals were uninfluential of the primary offensive impulses on the administration of Bush.Despite claims from President George W. Bush, within or outside, which has driven the thinking on the foreign policy conservative movements for over the past 60 years.

In addition, it granted a chance to the conservatives as far as applying their ideas, which have been durable with black results, is concerned.Works CitedFaragher, John Mack, Mari Jo Buhle, Daniel Czitrom, & Susan H. Armitage. Out of Many; A History of the American People. 6th Edition ed. Vol. 2. Pearson, 2008. Chapter 17-31. Print.Kashmeri, Sarwar A. America and Europe After 9/11 and Iraq: The Great Divide. Westport, Conn: Praeger Security International, 2007. Print.Hamm, Bernd. Devastating Society the Neo-conservative Assault on Democracy and Justice.

London: Pluto, 2005. Print.Chiba, Shin, & Thomas J. Schoenbaum. Peace Movements and Pacifism After September 11. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2008. Internet resource.Rozell, Mark J, & Gleaves Whitney. Testing the Limits: George W. Bush and the Imperial Presidency. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009. Print.Schweizer, Peter, & Wynton C. Hall. Landmark Speeches of the American Conservative Movement. College Station: Texas A & M University Press, 2007. Internet resource.Bonyanian, Masoud.

 Muslims Perceptions of the Bush Doctrine: Bridging the Gap with Islam. Münster [u.a.: LIT-Verl, 2009. Print.