We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Provide an in-depth analysis of the Gong Lum v. Rice - Case Study Example

Comments (0)
Rice’ case entailed a mandamus that was filed by the plaintiff, Gong Lum in the state circuit of Mississippi. Lum, a mercantile businessman, filed a case against the defendant Rice. Lum was not involved in the consular services. She was young during the filing of…
Download full paper
Provide an in-depth analysis of the Gong Lum v. Rice case
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
Provide an in-depth analysis of the Gong Lum v. Rice

Download file to see previous pages... Bayor asserts that Lum was denied a chance at Rosedale Consolidated High School because of her Chinese descent (45). This was in favor of the White students, who were allowed in this high school. The defendants in the case were responsible for her racial exclusion from the learning institution. The defendant included the Mississippi state superintendent, the board of trustees of the school, and Rice. The petitioners of the case indicate that there was no school that catered for the students of Chinese descent. The constitution of Mississippi stipulates that a common school fund should be available in every county to cater for the student needs. The fund ought to constitute of the taxation obtained from the public contributions and the apportionments from the treasury department. This fund is meant to support schools for four months.
The plea of the case is based on the breach of this requirement of the constitution. This is because Rosedale Consolidated High School was an appropriate school for Martha Lum. More to that, her father was a taxpayer who also helped to support the running of the school as stipulated in the legislative document. This implied that denying her the right to attend and learn in Rosedale high school was tantamount to racial discrimination, which was not allowed by Mississippi’s constitution. In essence, the fact that Martha was educable is substantial for her to be allowed to progress in her education and career. According to Dickson, it is Martha’s constitutional right to access education given that she was not a member of the colored race (67).
The colored race, especially Mongolians, was verboten in the Mississippi County. The court ruled that a writ of mandamus be invoked according to the petition filed to stop the hindering of Martha attending the school. The appeal of the defendants against the ruling of the supreme court of Mississippi culminated in a stern directive by the ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
Case Brief : Terry v. Ohio
This process is sometimes accompanied by a ‘pat down’ search of the outer clothing or apparel of the suspect, done with a view to ensure that the person is unarmed. While this mechanism is common place in today’s high risk world, its validity juxtaposed to the Fourth Amendment was examined by the Hon’ble United States Supreme Court in the case of Terry v.
4 Pages(1000 words)Case Study
Boumediene v. Bush Case Study
Do the prisoners have a right to the habeas corpus under the United States Constitution, and which acts is an unconstitutional suspension of that right? To which persons does the constitutional right of habeas corpus apply? Rules In January 2002, the Supreme Court of Bosnia ruled that the charges were to be dropped, and the six men released since there was no adequate evidence to hold the men.
7 Pages(1750 words)Case Study
Major Case Analysis Daughtery v. City of Maryland Heights, 231 S.W.3D 814 (MO. Banc 2007)
City of Maryland Heights Case number 321 S.W. 3D 814 (Mo Banc 2007), at the Missouri Supreme Court. Facts about the case In this case, Daugherty was employed as an officer with the police department of Mary Land Heights for over 10 years. In the year 2002, Douglas Daugherty was terminated from his job.
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Terry v. Ohio Case Brief
The act of the police officer is done upon his or her suspicion that a crime may be undertaken because of a sense or reasonable belief that the person in question may be armed and presently dangerous. This was the decision that the courts reached when they read the facts of the case as per the petition of John W. Terry, who was stopped and searched based upon a police officer's observation and conclusion that Terry seemed to be casing a store for a potential robbery.
3 Pages(750 words)Case Study
Case Comment: Bowman V. Fels
The Bowman v. Fel’s case involved money laundering disclosure requirements and litigation-related professional privilege. These requirements are outlined in the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) that was fully enforced on the 1st of March 2004.
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
Terry V Ohio case

According to the author, the Terry V Ohio case took place when a police officer stopped and checked three men because of their suspicious behavior. Occurring on October 31st 1963 when an experienced and old member of the Cleveland Police Department, Martin Macfadden, went patrolling downtown and saw two individuals acting suspiciously. 

8 Pages(2000 words)Case Study
Seigel v. Merrill Lynch Case Analysis
Seigel dragged Merrill Lynch to court for the lapse. The court, however, ruled in favor of Merrill Lynch since the plaintiff was indebted to the casinos. Seigel owed the casinos monies for the losses incurred by him in gambling. Under UCC 4-403 and 4-407, Seigel did not suffer actual loss from Merrill Lynch mistakenly making payments to the order of $ 143,000.
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
CASE ANALYSIS heart of atlanta motel v. united states
US were defined by the abominable policy of segregation, a dubious and heinous system that validated the separation of the White and Black Americans in the public sphere. Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited any sort of discrimination in public accommodations like hotels and
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
Wolf v. Colorado & Terry v. Ohio Case
takes into consideration state search and seizure practices at the time of the Fourth Amendment’s enactment and current state practices.In this regard when interpreting the Fourth Amendment,the court in defining the scope of Federal protection both trusts and mistrusts modern
2 Pages(500 words)Case Study
Mckee v. Laurion Case Study Analysis
The issue in contention is whether Dennis Laurion comments in a website called rate your doctor was genuine in relation to Dr. Mckee comments about the defendant's father. When Dr Mckee goes to a private room to review Laurion's father following a discharge from Intensive Care Unit (ICU), he allegedly made three statements.
1 Pages(250 words)Case Study
Let us find you another Case Study on topic Provide an in-depth analysis of the Gong Lum v. Rice case for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us