For this particular essay paper, I have chosen to discuss the successful nomination and confirmation process that Associate Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan underwent as a nominee of Pres. Barack Obama. Looking into the history of the person and her climb up the justice ladder,…
Download file to see previous pages...
Kagan became Pres. Obamas official nominee to replace retiring Associate Justice John Paul Stevens in 2010. It was easy to see why he would nominate her to the position. In his own words, Pres. Obama described her admirable character traits (Scherer, M., 2010) that led to her nomination as :
“Elena is respected and admired not just for her intellect and record of achievement, but also for her temperament, her openness to a broad array of viewpoints, her habit — to borrow a phrase from Justice [John Paul] Stevens — of understanding before disagreeing, her fair-mindedness and skill as a consensus builder.”
Ms. Kagan was nominated during a time of trial for our nation. America was in the grips of the worst recession to ever hit its people, the economy was in shambles and the previous Bush administration had often circumvented the law in order to fulfill its own political agenda. She was in effect, coming into a wounded supreme court that needed to be rehabilitated for hits own good. With her nomination, the president was merely trying to put the best person he could find in to fill the job. By his standards, she fit the bill to a T. There was no political agenda behind it and no lobby group behind her nomination. If there were, she would not have eventually been confirmed.
That is not to say though that her nomination was without controversy. there were accusations coming from the GOP, who were actively campaigning against her nomination, that Kagan often defied the constitution by disallowing the military access to students on the Harvard campus during her tenure as Dean at the prestigious university. Columnist Phyllis Schlafly claimed that Kagan had “defied the Solomon Amendment" -- a statute requiring schools to provide the same access to military recruiters that they provide to other potential employers or lose federal funding”. While Foxs Sean Hannity also reported that she had “led an effort to "kick
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“U.S. Supreme Court Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1611977-us-supreme-court
(U.S. Supreme Court Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“U.S. Supreme Court Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1611977-us-supreme-court.
The cases are granted by the Supreme Court based on certain guidelines put forward in the Article III. II) The Paramount Article III Importantly, the authority to adjudicate constitutional disputes comes within the scope of Article III. According to Article III, the judicial power in the United States is vested upon the federal courts.
The court ruled by a narrow 5-4 margin that the Arizona program promoting school choice can continue − dismissing a lawsuit waged by the American Civil Liberties Union on behalf of taxpayers who disliked the program.
Question 1 Facts In the case of Davis v. Washington, U.S. Supreme Court, (2006) where McCottry had been assaulted by Davis the boyfriend who had later on fled the scene. McCottry was supposed to testify for charges of felony violation of domestic order. This led to using hearsay from the 911 call recording that was made by McCottry despite Davis objection of not doing it.
The Warren Court's landmark 1963 opinion in Gideon revisited the issue confronted twenty years earlier in Betts v. Brady - the scope of an indigent defendant's constitutional entitlement to government-provided assistance in state court.
was a banner a student held up at a school event—an Olympic torch relay in Alaska—that read “Bong Hits 4 Jesus.” Because of the unusual and eye-catching sentiment expressed in the banner, and because of the debate over whether students had the right to express anything
There goal was to encourage diversity and they effectively bused children to different school districts depending on the colour of their skin. The court—which was very closely split along political and ideological lines—decided
these differences, anytime Congress was on the verge of establishing the legal structures necessary for the implementation of a direct tax, it behooved the legislative body to divide the duty among the American constituent States, as provided for by the laws of apportionment. In
Throughout the process, the republicans and democrats fought head on tossing arguments with each other by the rule of the law making it a situation that necessitated the intervention of the highest courts. This has been
Court and United States Congress constitutions are responsible for protecting the United States citizen’s rights against police officers’ abuses (Campbell, 2002). The United States Congress’ tasks include creating laws that ensure the citizens’ rights against illegally
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic U.S. Supreme Court for FREE!