StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Doctrine of Judicial Review - Research Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Doctrine of Judicial Review" asserts that the actions of the Executive and Legislative arms of government are subject to review by the Judiciary. The concept supports the position that members of the public can challenge the actions of the President, Cabinet Ministers, Congress, etc…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.3% of users find it useful
Doctrine of Judicial Review
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Doctrine of Judicial Review"

Rather, Britain adheres to the principle of parliamentary supremacy which gives the Crown and Parliament [House of Lords and House of Commons after the 1832 Reform Act ] the right to make laws. These laws followed the ultra vires rule and once a given situation fell under the scope of a law enacted by Parliament, it had to be obeyed without question

Britain remained in this situation until the mid-1900s when the House of Lords was allowed to review cases that contained inherent legal disputes that could not be handled by the courts. However, one of the landmark changes that the independence of the United States brought was the creation of an independent Judiciary that is headed by a Supreme Court which was meant to act as an independent branch of government with the power to control the two other arms of government .

The landmark ruling that established the precedence of Judicial Review was issued by Justice John Marshall in 1803 when he ruled on the case of Marbury V Madison. This paper examines the ruling of this landmark case in US legal history and its role in establishing the principle of Judicial Review which subsists to this day. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“John Marshall and Judicial Review Research Paper”, n.d.)
John Marshall and Judicial Review Research Paper. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1609564-john-marshall-and-judicial-review
(John Marshall and Judicial Review Research Paper)
John Marshall and Judicial Review Research Paper. https://studentshare.org/history/1609564-john-marshall-and-judicial-review.
“John Marshall and Judicial Review Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1609564-john-marshall-and-judicial-review.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Doctrine of Judicial Review

Judicial Activism of the European Court of Justice

Name: University: Course: Tutor: Date: judicial activism of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) Introduction judicial activism refers to the assumption of legislative powers by a court by way of creating policy.... This essay explores the perceived judicial activism of the (ECJ) in an attempt to create a constitutional foundation for the European Union (EU).... judicial activism in the case of ECJ refers to the political implications of the policies made by the court in its interpretative role (Rasmussen 45) The detractors of the ECJ feel that it promotes European federalism to the detriment of the interests of Member States....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Engel vs Vitale

Author [Manager] [Subject] 27 May 2015 ENGLE V.... VITALE 370 US 421 (1962) Facts: The Board of Regents in the State of New York has allowed the recitation of a voluntary prayer “Almighty God” before the start of the day in school.... Several of the students of the public schools through their parents complained that such mandatory requirement....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

The Doctrine of Judicial Activism

The Doctrine of Judicial Review: Its Legal and Historical Basis and Other Essays, USA: The Law Book Exchange Limited, 1999.... The traditional meaning of judicial review was illustrated in two instances.... The traditional meaning of judicial review was illustrated in two instances.... The doctrine of judicial activism holds that the “federal judiciary should take an active role in using its powers to check the activities of the governmental bodies, when those bodies exceed their authorities “(Bardes, Shelley and Schmidt, 458)....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Do Judges Make the Law or Find It

In common law countries, the case law left behind by the judges is used in applying to other cases that relate to the previous ones based on the doctrine of judicial precedent.... It has been argued to a greater extent that the doctrine of judicial precedent is an indirect way in which judges make law.... The doctrine of separation of powers stipulates that each branch of the government should not interfere with the mandate and roles of the other branch and each branch should be allowed to operate independently....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

The Preservation of Separation of Powers As a Check on Autocratic Power

s such, the Doctrine of Judicial Review is theoretically vital in serving as a testament to the independence of the judiciary in its role under the fundamental constitutional separation of powers in ensuring that public bodies, such as government departments, local authorities, tribunals, agencies have not acted ultra vires5.... 2However, contention has remained as to the concept of justiciability and the constitutional limits of judicial review.... This paper highlights the judicial review of the legality of acts of the executive represents the central method by which courts control the exercise of governmental power; which in turn operates as a central underlying facet of the separation of powers principle propounded....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The Renowned Case of Marbury vs Madison

Madison case is based on the judicial review of the Article III of the US constitution.... This paper "The Renowned Case of Marbury vs Madison" focuses on the review of the case of Marbury v.... The evaluation of this would lead to an understanding of the loopholes in the US judicial System and improve the US judicial System.... The Article III suggests of the establishment of the judicial Branches in the US judicial System....
9 Pages (2250 words) Assignment

O'Reilly v Mackman

O'Reilly v Mackman is also credited with extending and qualifying the general rules and ambit of judicial review.... 2The most salient feature of the O'Reilly case, the procedural exclusivity rule determined that all matters concerning public law issues had to be litigated by way of judicial review.... Moreover, the decision in O'Reilly maintains that judicial review exists to ensure that those decisions are exercised on a legally correct basis....
6 Pages (1500 words) Case Study

Do Judges Make the Law or Find It

In common law countries, the case law left behind by the judges is used in applying to other cases that relate to the previous ones based on the doctrine of judicial precedent.... It has been argued to a greater extent that the doctrine of judicial precedent is an indirect way in which judges make law.... The doctrine of separation of powers stipulates that each branch of the government should not interfere with the mandate and roles of the other branch and each branch should be allowed to operate independently....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us