This essay focuses on comparison here is of the two articles written by Madison and Brutus. Both have extremely different opinions regarding the same question “A confederated government is best for the United States of America or not.”…
Download file to see previous pages...
The people should be divided into different interest sectors and categories so that they have little time to concentrate on issues like discrimination, disruption and being an oppressor. Madison talks about unity, a united country with united people, common interests, decisions, thinking and arguments. He states up to the extent. The main advantage of having a country under one body is the representatives selected are refined through a lot of people (and a lot of people deciding to cast a vote for the same person cannot be wrong). Such a medium of chosen bodies are the best in wisdom and may best discern and distinguish the true interest of the country. It would be more consonant and publically good to hire people who could translate their thinking and mind-set on a broader scale. The number of the elected representatives should not be increased as a selection of a lot of people brings about trouble and selection of a few results in a disaster. You get and elect trained and practiced people who decide for your future thus taking the country to a new direction the best part of such a structure is that no one can dawn upon the other, that means no bullying can be done and no tyrant can be sustainable. Also, they cannot just do wrong as they are the center of attention of a lot of people and their every movement is being recorded. Brutus in the article Anti- Federalist paper states that there should be thirteen different states with an individual executive and judiciary.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The local politicians who feared of losing their power also joined the anti-federalists. “The arguments of anti-federalists relied on rhetoric of revolutionary war era which stressed on virtues of local rule and associated centralized power with a tyrannical monarch” (Constitution of the United Status-Federalists versus ant-federalists).
On the other hand, the Anti-federalists had authors such as Brutus, Cato, Centinel and Federal Farmer. The anti-federalists also used pseudonyms in calling for the inclusion of Bill of Rights of into the new constitution while Madison in his federalist papers was of opposing view (Madison and et al 23).
The main aim of this paper was to introduce and propose checks and balances in the government to ensure creation of various aspects of political and government system with powers divided to each respective aspect. The paper also provided the right means of conducting elections at each level of the political system and appointments made at each level of government (Janda and Goldman 23).
As we say “Majority is authority”, the majority cannot vote for bad or something not of worth. They would definitely be going for someone who could translate their interests and their thinking. The people should be divided into different interest sectors and categories so that they have little time to concentrate over issues like discrimination, disruption and being an oppressor.
Hamilton would serve in the Cabinet and become a major force in setting economic policy for the US (The Federalist Papers 1997). Federalist Paper No. 10 is an essay by James Madison and the tenth of the Federalist Papers, a series arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution.
To guarantee independence like this, only one branch should not have more power then the others when it comes to choosing members of the other two branches. If this theory was seriously followed, it would suggest that the citizens must opt for the president, the legislators, as well as the judges.
f people, who are members of a particular faction and are prejudiced, assumes control of the government machinery, can betray the interests of other people. The causes of faction can be attributed to the inborn tendency in man to form groups basing on ethnic, racial or cultural
The Federalist paper chosen is “The Federalist Paper No. 1” by Alexander Hamilton and the Anti-Federalist paper chosen is “The Brutus” by Robert Yates.
If we examine the Federalist paper first, we find that Hamilton was laying out a series
, capable of increasing by means of further associations, till they arrive at such a degree of power as to be able to provide for the security of the whole body” (www.intellectualtakeout.org, Founders).
It was in 1780s in colonial America when federalism developed a political