Download file to see previous pages...
Through listening carefully and analysing Juror 8 point, other jurors think critically, which changes the verdict of all jurors to “not guilty.”
On several instances, jurors change their verdict after listening to curiously and critically. In one case, on seeing juror 4 rub his nose from the irritation of his glasses, he recalls than the second witness in the case, a woman, wore glasses. The woman claimed to have seen the murder form her bedroom window when she was sleeping. Juror 8 asks juror 4 if he wears his glasses when sleeping, which he confirms that he does not and that no body does it. Listening carefully, juror 8 then makes a judgement that the woman in question could not have time to put her glasses on to witness the swift events of this case.
Listening between the lines helps uncover the reasoning of the eleven jurors who initially voted for the boy to be convicted. Some of them just voted this way to dismiss the case and attend to other personal issues like watching a game. Others accepted the face value of the witnesses because they seemed innocent. Listening between the lines, helps uncover some lies, twists, and logics to this case giving the boy a fair verdict.
This movie gives a lesson to all jurors to consider everyone “not guilty” until they have the facts of the guilt. The fact that case looks straight forward and the witness convincing does not amount to guilt. Listening and critically analysis issues can lead to saving a life, which would otherwise be sentenced to
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Thereafter, he describes the challenges that Mexicans encountered during the war. Indeed, most of the activities that shaped the present-day Mexico are attributable to the Mexican revolution. The disputed elections and unfair treatment by the authorities, led to the revolution (Reed 1).
O’Sullivan is seen to strongly hold onto his opinion and provides a strong backing for it, Contrary to the reasons provided by the opposers such as the provocation of war with Mexico, O’Sullivan says that the annexation of Texas would not result to a war if rightly handled.
Thus, my everyday activity or interaction occurs within the community context of my family and my principles of behavior become palpable in an understanding of the various activities that I undertake. In my family environment, we share our experiences and interactions.
The author states that research is the first step. Writer should think on the material available for essay writing and also get the material from internet and books. Second step is analyzing the relevance of topic. Brainstorming for framing the ideas and questions and then answering them is the third step that should be considered.
Thankfully, there are ways to make the job easier. First of all, in order for someone to be able to write, he has to know the basic information about the subject matter and there is no better way to do this than to do a research. This could
Paul was a Pharisee who fervently followed the Law of Moses. During his 30s Paul sees a vision of the Christ which transforms him into a new individual blessed with a spirit of wisdom and revelation that finally lead to a
Apparently, John Jeremiah Sullivan does various researches on music using different resources. Notably, Sullivan relied on telephone calls to analyze different musicians and genres of music. He initiated telephone calls with music
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Write an essay examining how paul sullivan explains the caste war in yucatan for FREE!