The U>S Legal System - Assignment Example

Legal Issue and a Strong and Substantiate Argument in Support of Your Opinion Task The case is centered on two counts: counts of murder and burglary. On the count of murder, the defendant is accused of the first degree murder. First-degree murder, in most states, is an illegal killing that is both premeditated and willful, meaning that it was committed after "lying in wait" or planning for the victim. In this case, the deceased had earlier wanted to dispose of some of her diamond rings, though not clear.

The defendant may have been involved in the deal and latter planned to kill her for the rings. That again introduces another crime committed – burglary. Based on the evidence provided, the defendant broke into Stella Blauvelt’s house. The sole disputation of the fact that the defendant makes is that the provided evidence is not sufficient enough to find him culpable. However, based on the material fact of stolen things and broken door, the jury found it beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the burglary and murder.

Task 2:What constitutes a “fair trial”? Based on the democratic ideals, in a fair trial the rights of the defendants are honored throughout the trial. This implies that the trial is handled under the established law and due process, and the ruling is handed down by a neutral body.What is the due process of law? The due process is the right to a fair treatment and the defendant has a fighting chance when confronted with a legal action. The admission of the stocking tops did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial.

Therefore, he was not denied the due process of law. What was being done was just gathering evidence, and the authorities had the right to access his house.Task 3:General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence is applicable in this case. It provides that all evidence that is relevant is admissible, although with certain exceptions, and that irrelevant evidence is not admissible. That is why even after finding the stockings in his house, it was not sufficient evidence to incriminate the accused.Works CitedThe People, Respondent, vs.

Admiral Dewey Adamson, Appellant. No. 4622. Supreme Court of California. January 4, 1946. Print.