Download file to see previous pages...
It also looks at how Alexander Hamilton’s policies wanted to use the wealthy, manufacturers and the US National Bank to turn around the economy that was affected by a series of civil revolutions; as well as why his proposals were criticized. Finally, it discusses the impacts of his policies. Top of Form
Alexander Hamilton was the first treasury secretary of the United States government headed by President Washington (Swanson, 43). When he was appointed the treasury secretary, the United States government was facing hard economic times following the American revolutions. The government was faced with huge debts, inflation and the majority of economic sectors seemed to be doing badly. It is then that President Washington tasked Alexander Hamilton with the duty of stabilizing the United States economy. Alexander Hamilton was to come up with fiscal policies that would revive the economy of the federal government. He advocated for modern capitalism to turn around the United States economy (Hansen, 166).
In his first steps, towards reviving the economy, Hamilton proposed the chartering of the first United States National Bank. The bank’s mandate was assisting the government in coming up with monetary and financial solutions, serving as the main depository arm of the federal government as well as regulating state banks. He also recommended that the outstanding Confederation Debt be funded at face value. The paying of these outstanding state debts would ensure stability and commitment of the government in restoring its economy. To finance the paying off debts, Hamilton proposed an issue of new bonds to investors who would gain profits when the government was able to pat the new bonds (Swanson, 43).
In his approach to financial and monetary policies, Hamilton targeted the wealthy individuals within the US. He wanted to align the business class, manufacturers, creditors and all the wealth with the federal
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
In addition, Christians began to deemphasize themselves with the set up approach to worship at a time which resulted to a general sense of resonant and complacency among Christians and instead, they adopted a way comprised of great emotion and
This constitution will bring with it equal opportunities for citizens across our country thus enabling all the citizens to have an opportunity to achieve their dreams. (Maier.2011)
As a strong supporter of federalism, I agree with the constitution’s Federalist stand on
The Missouri compromise in 1820 was a measure presented in the congress to find a way to determine whether slavery would be made legal in the new territories admitted as States to the union or not. The Missouri compromise elicited debate in the congress but once passed,
president making a tremendous change through drafting and passing of many policies, he was characterized by use of force through the powers that were embedded to him in order to satisfy his interests. In addition, although there was a standing cabinet, the president went ahead
Mumford (1998) contrasts modern Western cities with those build around conflicts, dictatorships and poverty among other demanding conditions. Nonetheless, the author does not criticize the city, but rather
The countries had just got rid of wars and they were picking up what was left behind. There were many people who had plans to travel to the nations that had been victorious in the war for better economic opportunities. I had once met an Italian, who was a businessman in his own country but the issues had aggravated, he had to leave everything behind.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic History Discussion for FREE!