Analysis of The Grapes of Wrath Book by John Steinbeck - Essay Example

The institutions that yielded from World War Two were regarded as denials of human dignity and sustenance in The Grapes of Wrath which was John’s most controversial work in his writing career (John, 2011). The novel condemns the generation for all wrong reasons and its inability to uphold and guarantee human sustenance and dignity. This description of the 1930s and 1940s generation although strict has shifted the paradigm to the current generation.

The current generation is by far significantly different from the one described by John in the 1930s. The current generation does not entertain and permit slavery and another form of dehumanizing practices like what happened then. A departure from the past generation, the current one is offering economic, socio-cultural, and political freedoms to countries and regions, unlike the only capitalism that was preferred with all its inadequacies. Currently, countries may choose any form of the socio-economic system from capitalism like the United States to communism like China (John, 2011).

However, a common characteristic between the two generations is how they handle natural disasters. The preparedness is not adequate considering how John’s generation handled the Great Depression is not any different from how the current generation handled the Great Recession in 2007/2008. The difference is the perception and perspectives of how the current generation approaches issues and natural disasters due to the advancement of technology, unlike the past. A point worth noting is the responsiveness to natural disasters and economic recessions, the current generation has improved mostly due to sophisticated ways of information transfer.

Respect for human rights has greatly improved with the current generation compared to that of our parents and grandparents. In conclusion, the current generation differs significantly virtually in all aspects from our parents and grandparents' generation. This difference is reflected in socio-economical, cultural, political, and ethical perspectives and approaches (John, 2011).