Calhoun supports the claim that slavery is patriarchal and leaves slaves better off than northern “wage slaves” by explaining how the white men direct the labor of slaves to result in the benefit of all, and how the slaveholders care for their slaves into old age by giving…
Download file to see previous pages...
er in the north is able to achieve the very same by choice of employment, and has more intellectual, moral, and physical benefit by being able to have a say in their field of work and in where they live. They also are able to pursue education to a much higher standard than most southern slaves would ever be allowed, and have a set of morals that is embraced by them rather than imposed on them. Despite any benefits that Calhoun may claim, I would argue that they an inherently harmful if they are imposed within the relationship of owner and slave rather than teacher and student or employer and employee.
Southerners who were not part of the “Plantation Aristocracy” still supported slavery because it was a cornerstone of their overall economic system. Without slavery, the southern economy would have to undergo massive hardship and reform, and a new system would require a much larger portion of the white population to work. These people felt that slavery was a basic part of their culture, as well, and defended slavery as a right. Furthermore, the institution of slavery gave southerners greater political power per capita, and thus their votes in Congress were represented more strongly without the input—but with the population strength—of their slaves. Slavery had an effect on every piece of the economic system of the south, as slaveholders had more money to spend because they were able to run their plantations using unpaid labor. This money went into the economy that supported all southerners in their own businesses and endeavors, and a lack of such wealth would lead to a lower amount of disposable income in the entire region. Furthermore, these southerners did not have the moral opposition to slavery that many northerners felt. The lack of abolitionist thought in their religious and moral views led to them being more passively supportive of slavery. Finally, many saw abolition as a northern movement to control the south more directly. This was an expansion of
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Analyzing and Discussing Primary and Secondary Source Documents Essay - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1582315-analyzing-and-discussing-primary-and-secondary-source-documents
(Analyzing and Discussing Primary and Secondary Source Documents Essay - 1)
“Analyzing and Discussing Primary and Secondary Source Documents Essay - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1582315-analyzing-and-discussing-primary-and-secondary-source-documents.
Primary source is an inside information linked to history or past of any material or human. It describes the origin and the initial development of any source. The terminology is used in several connotations, which describes the information, factors and elements around any source.
Slavery is the type of business which involves trafficking and selling of human beings like any other commodity that can be sold anywhere in the world market. America were among the many countries who were actively involved in slavery and slave trade during the early periods of the eighteenth century.
Slavery was exercised across the American settlements in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; these slaves served in building the economical foundations of the newly born nation. In 1793, the central importance of slavery was solidified in the economy of the South by the invention of a cotton gin machine.
The high level of connectivity that has emerged in various corners around the world is mostly because of faster expansion of the internet in the developing as well as the developed regions. The rise of the internet has transformed the world in to a highly connected one single entity.
It is uninterpreted and unevaluated not because the source does not include his/her personal interpretations or opinions of events, but because the material is not from a third person who merely comments, interprets, or evaluates the account of firsthand experience.
Finally, on April 1, with Madrid, Barcelona and Valencia in Nationalist hands, President Francisco Franco (a general) declared the war over and himself head of state. The end of the war was followed by vicious reprisals against Republicans.
What do Beeton’s instructions about the management and duties of household servants tell us about how life in modern urban societies has altered over the past century and a half?
The qualities of a good servant include observance and the invariable acquisition of the mistress
The original text is supposed to have been written in Sanskrit language in around 1st century CE. The Chinese version done by Kumarajiva in 406 CE is available at present.
Vimalakirti is an ordinary individual and not a learned scholar. One