Free

The balance between freedom and truth- a dialogue - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
On November 06, 2009, God arranged for a discussion or dialogue among five randomly chosen individuals (long dead) to be telecast live by practically every TV network in the United States and the rest of the world. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER98.4% of users find it useful
The balance between freedom and truth- a dialogue
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The balance between freedom and truth- a dialogue"

The balance between freedom and truth- a dialogue On November 06, 2009, God arranged for a discussion or dialogue among five randomly chosen individuals (long dead) to be telecast live by practically every TV network in the United States and the rest of the world. It is believed that the purpose behind this act was an attempt at bringing a relative sense of truth that needs to be imbibed into practical politics in the twenty-first century. The technicalities on how God managed this worldwide telecast is beyond the comprehension of this writer, but the net result is that it happened on the above mentioned date. The randomly chosen participants are as follows:
John Winthrop – Puritan and Governor of Massachusetts (1588-1649).
Christopher Columbus – Well, every American has heard about him.
Ioann (John) Veniaminov- Russian missionary in Alaska (1797-1879)
Roger Williams – Founder of Rhode Island and religious seeker (1603-1683).
Jean Nicollet – French fur trader (1598-1642).
The participants in the dialogue were introduced by President Barack Obama. Christopher Columbus, as the discoverer of America, started the dialogue.
Columbus: I need not remind anyone here that I was the one responsible for the colonization of this land. The native people of this land were pagans and the only way to bring about a change was through enforced rules that made them see the truth of our religion. I presume, everyone here agrees with the statement that religion is concerned with truth – and hence the true religion should be enforced by the state: those who do not believe or deviate in their beliefs, from what the state says is the religious Truth ought to be punished, as severely as necessary to convince them of the errors of their ways.
Veniaminov: Glory to God our savior. I agree with this illustrious gentleman. I believe from my experiences with Aleut Indians that Christianity, as a unified religion, is the best way to govern a state. I have, with the grace of God, been able to bring about a civilized society for those people without damaging their culture and language. The truth in the teachings of Christ also helped to bring about peace and harmony between the native Indians and the white settlers. What more could an administrator, king or politician wish for? But I am for a more moderate approach. I believe that punishment be less severe and a change be brought about through love and patience and not through fear.
Williams: Could both of you expand a little more on what you have opined. I do agree wholeheartedly that religion is concerned with truth. But there are many religions in the world and they are now present in this modern world. When you say that religion should be enforced by the state, which is the one that should be enforced.
Veniaminov: As for me, there is only one religion and it is the one that I have taught my Indians.
Columbus: I agree
Winthrop: With due respect, all of you may be aware that Judaism and Islam are also exist in this world. It is a fact that the followers of these two religions along with others like Hinduism may outnumber those who follow Christian faith.
(Both Veniaminov and Columbus express surprise at this statement)
Nicollet: Gentlemen, I am but a layperson in this regard. I was a trapper and a clerk and do not have much knowledge in this area. But could someone explain in simple words, what you mean by the word ‘truth’?
Columbus: Well, truth means ‘not telling a lie’.
Veniaminov: To me, truth means standing by what a person believes (to be true).
Williams: But this brings up further questions. The honorable Winthrop brought up the names up two other faiths. They believe in different Gods, but does that mean that their followers are liars. They have different practices and beliefs, but are fundamentally similar to our faith in the sense that both Islam and Judaism also adheres to principles like love, piety, and charity.
Nicollet: I have interacted extensively with the Native American Indians during my fur trade days. These pagans as described by Columbus had their own beliefs and practices. For one, they worshipped nature in many of its manifestations. The Algonquin, for example, worshiped a fire dragon. From their explanations, the fire dragon was a meteor. Is there something wrong in this? Is it falsehood for these people to follow their beliefs?
Columbus: They are not living truthfully as far as their beliefs go. The state should intervene and force them to change their beliefs. Those who refuse should be punished.
Veniaminov: If I was in your place, dear Nicollet, they would have been made to see the truth.
Nicollet: Sorry, I was a fur trader and not a preacher. Anyway I do not see them to be untruthful in any way. They led a peaceful and loving life and had good relationship with the white setters and other tribes.
Columbus: I stand by with what the Saint says. Spain conquered many parts of the world and had converted many pagans by force or other means.
Williams: Gentlemen, it appears at this stage that truth is relative. Yes, it does involve not telling lies and standing by one’s beliefs. But it does not entail a forceful acceptance of beliefs and practices of a particular religion. The world of today is not the one that you saw in your times. It is too globalized. That is the word being used today. Some people also refer it to as a global village. Truth should be limited to goodness, honesty and patriotism which can be enforced through statues. An enforcement of truth through religion in my eyes is persecution. In 1644, I had written that “the permission of other consciences and worships that a state professeth, only can (according to God) procure a firm and lasting peace, (good assurance being taken according to the wisdom of the civil state) for uniformity of civil obedience from all forts” (Gaustad and Schmidt 156).
Winthrop: You have just expressed my view on the topic, Mr. Williams. The constitution of our country is based upon the teachings of Jesus Christ, but we allow religious freedom and do not see other faiths as not following the truth. It might come as a surprise to all of you that modern day statesmen like Michael Dukakis and Ronald Reagan have quoted my views on this. Freedom and truth should go hand in hand.
Nicollet: I agree with Mr. Winthrop and Mr. Williams
President Obama (n his concluding remarks): Well, a democratic vote shows that the argument for freedom to practice any faith along with enforcement of truth through statutes wins. Good night and thank you gentlemen.
(Columbus walks out in a huff, Veniaminov smiles and the other three clap heartily)
References
Gaustad, E S & Schmidt, L E. The Religious History of America. Harper, 2002 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The balance between freedom and truth- a dialogue Essay”, n.d.)
The balance between freedom and truth- a dialogue Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1559344-the-balance-between-freedom-and-truth-a-dialogue
(The Balance Between Freedom and Truth- a Dialogue Essay)
The Balance Between Freedom and Truth- a Dialogue Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1559344-the-balance-between-freedom-and-truth-a-dialogue.
“The Balance Between Freedom and Truth- a Dialogue Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1559344-the-balance-between-freedom-and-truth-a-dialogue.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The balance between freedom and truth- a dialogue

Political Dialogue between Hitler and Stalin

...? Political Dialogue between Hitler and Stalin Adolf Hitler, the notorious dictator of Germany, represents the darker side of Nazism which dragged the whole world towards the World War II. On the other side, Joseph Stalin represents the dark side of Communist ideology, which dragged the whole world towards the Cold War and it’s far reaching consequences. In Germany, the Nazi Party was under the authority of Adolf Hitler represented Nazism. On the other side, in 1922, The Communist Party of the Soviet Union became totally under the control of Joseph Stalin. The theoretical parts of both these political ideologies were similar but the practical side led the whole world to calamity and bloodshed. Thesis...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

DIALOGUE

..., and Griffiths, 2006: 143). Sometimes a show of unity, friendship and teamwork does not in reality, symbolize that the involved are actually friend. This paper will represent a dialogue in the form of a script, between two theorists, Michael Foucault, and Anthony Giddens. The dialogue will actually, be based on the theorists’ theoretical views on friendship. Anthony Giddens: In fact, friendship between people rewards many individuals, but to others, who lose it take it as punishment. It is a fact that, many people repeatedly find agreement with views of their own to be really rewarding. Michael Foucault: Yeah…! Anthony Giddens: This reward indeed, favors sentiments...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Balance Between Good for Society vs. Individual Freedom

...Balance Between good for society vs. individual freedom Safety is one of the main problems and concerns investigated and controlled by the society and the government. The main health-care problems that the government is obliged to tackle is proliferation of diseases (namely pandemics and viruses). In contrast with traditional viruses such as smallpox and poliomyelitis, new viruses of fearful scope have now appeared. HIV/AIDS and avian influenza are the main threats to safety and existence of mankind. The threat can be explained by the fact that the alterations of mutation, reassortment, and recombination, viruses could have evolved their own genetic structure. According to statistical...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Freedom and the Art of Balance

...Ethics. In this Aristotle pointed out the virtue ethics which demarcated the proper functioning of every article of thing. He said that what is fact is truth for e.g. an eye is only a good eye as long as it can see as the proper function of eye is sight. Also, he identified the best activity of the soul as eudaimonia (a sense of happiness that suffuses the good life) and in order to attain the good life one must live a balanced life and avoid anything in excess. This excess could hold different meaning for different people and also for different situations and exists as a golden mean between the two vices- one is an excess while other is a deficiency (Nichomachean Ethics). This is...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Balance Between Work and Family

...Sociology Essay Order Number: 125192 Many Australian s have undergone significant changes, work and family, in particular, have been forced to alter dramatically to cope with the demands of modernity. The aim of this essay is twofold; how are the roles of men and women adapting to changes in work and family life in Australia? And are we moving towards more gender equality in the balance between work and family, or something else? The major changes examined here are attitudes to work and family, the creation of new occupational categories and how this facilitated greater female participation in the workforce. Increased female participation and how this has changed the very nature of the family. Labor...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Dialogue

... exists. Rather it is replaced by an acquaintance, colleague or a person one does not know. Along with this change, there is another change that relates to the replacement of certain emotions. Excuse me from elaborating, but I believe that in today’s world, honor takes the place of loyalty; loyalty is only seconded by personal affection. Furthermore, sincerity takes the place of authenticity, which refers to the notion that the other person be open and a well-wisher. Therefore a friend may not be expected to deliver the truth at all times. Conversely, a friend is someone who safeguards the emotional prosperity of the other person. In the olden times, people used to define a good and sincere friend as someone who is willing to help... the...
10 Pages(2500 words)Essay

Dialogue

...Dialogue between Walter Benjamin and Myself Me: The concept of Aura is among the most famous theoretical by WalterBenjamin. However, first describe who is Walter Benjamin is? Benjamin: Walter Bendix Schonflies Benjamin is a German-Jewish essayist, literary critic, translator, broadcaster, and social critic. I am famous for combining Romanticism, Jewish mysticism, and historical materialism to make the influential contributions to Western Marxism and aesthetic theory. Within the communication realms, Benjamin is known for the ‘aura’ concept (Benjamin 19). Me: That is a very amazing description. So what is the ‘aura’ concept? Benjamin: In recent times, the concept of aura has had many definitions...
2 Pages(500 words)Assignment

Imaginary dialogue between Parmenides and Heraclitus

...is fundamentally changing. The universe is the same now as it always has been and as how it always will be. Heraclitus: That is absurd how is it possible for the universe to be the same now as it was a hundred years ago, clearly things have changed? Parmenides: No that is only an illusion. Time is also an illusion. I promise you Heraclitus, the universe does not change. Heraclitus: But what about my memory? I have no recollection of the future, thus it has not occurred. The difference between the present and the future then demonstrates that the universe is changing. Parmenides: I recognize that you make a strong argument Heraclitus. I agree with you that humans have no understanding of the future. However, this...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Dialogue between Two Women

One major difference between the two centuries is the industrial revolution that changed the whole social dynamics of the world. Flora: But it has changed. Nowadays seeking a profession for a woman is not taboo. But most of the professions that women get areas housemaids or if they are good at reading and writing, they can be teachers or they can become novelists like me. Jane: Well, that sounds nice, even though your century seems more open, but still women are not equal to men in social dynamics. I don’t know about the specific roles in your society but here in the eighteenth century, we women, usually after the age of 23, wait for their prince charming to knock at their doorstep. We have to show shyness and have to act de...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Dialogue

...Dialogue It is often that some people do not possess the ability to converse topics that are important to them without getting into a dispute. This can get even worse when people are holding onto their personal interests. It’s often that positional versus interest-based communications will result into a conflict due to such individual stands. Personal stand is where one party holds on a particular opinion of an issue often conflicting with a common underlying interest whereas interest-based communications’ focus is on utilizing the common interests with an aim of benefitting the resolution process (Furlong, 2005,). Dialogue is a way of conversation in which conflicting parties relate and converse in search of for an understanding... . In this...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic The balance between freedom and truth- a dialogue for FREE!

Contact Us