Greek Sculptures - Assignment Example

Art history Question one: It becomes more difficult especially to sculptures that have no identity to know their existence. Greeks statute is different from the roman sculpture in terms of style and characteristics. The two sculptures that were discovered are almost similar to each other, but they only have some distinct features that differentiate them. it is also true to say that the art of ancient Greek and Rome have scaled almost the same heights in the sculptures that are presented. Some features that are used to identify Greek sculpture cannot apply sometimes due to difference in the sculptures. The ancient Greek sculpture has always been able to stand on without any support. Roman sculptures were created or curved in such a way that they cannot stand without a subjection of support or broad base to them. The two sculptures have shown distinct features such as possibility of broad base from the second sculpture that shows a crowd of people around a man on horseback. The 6 feet marble relief of standing man is a Greek sculpture, since the background of the sculpture looks like it has been made from bronze. Both the two sculptures are made from bronze and marble but the heights are different. Greeks used to make slightly taller curving than the Romans. The first statue is more idealistic and has an athletic figure than the sculpture of crowded men behind a man with the horseback. Greek artists concentrated more on their mythology in the creation of the statues, and unlike the Romans they gave more importance on athleticism making them produce idealistic statues. The second curving of crowded men behind a man on horseback looks more real, and it does not seem like one that believe in mythology. Only the Romans believed in creating sculptures that looked real and they didn’t believe in mythology. The Romans gave much importance to realism that made them create sculptures of real people. One bigger thing about the Romans is that they believe and cropped into history. The work of the artist from Romans has always described more of historical nature than the Greek’s artists. The second sculpture that shows crowded people around a man on horseback seems to be very ancient than the first sculpture. The background of the statue shows old but real creativity of old trees and the relation seems historical. The Romans became popular of their statue cravings due to their creative style on historical background. The first statue of a standing male is very plain and has no background that can describe a historical creativity or evolvement therefore it represents a work from Greek artists. Greek artist started by creating small sculptures but they evolved and created statues of mythological character, and as well they upgraded themselves as the creators of marble sculptures as well. The Greeks awhile evolving from making small sculptures to mythological once they created tall but not that much taller than the Romans structures, that is why you can suggest that the first sculpture is that of a Greek artist’s work rather than the Romans. Sometimes it is very hard to differentiate statue of the Romans from that of the Greek, it is because the Romans have tried to preserve the statue culture and tradition and as well they have followed closely the work of Greek artists. And due to time passing they developed statue of their own with a very unique style of creativity. If you look carefully at the second statue of crowded men around a man on horseback is more unique and if you take a closer look you will realize that the background is very unique compared to the first sculpture of a standing man with a very plain background. Compared to other works with the lifelike statue of the classical era, a good Greek sculpture is rigid and stylized making it seems so obvious but distinctive from other work. Sculptures that are more culturally and traditionally linked are the Roman statues. But to some extend some of the Greek sculptures do show cultural affiliations just like the Roman statues. In the two sculptures that were discovered by the archaeologists only one indicates cultural affiliation and more so it is that of ancient Roman culture. The background of the second statue as discussed before indicates traditional relationship and culture of the people curved in it. Question two: Constructing a building using ancient form and method requires a lot of consideration since the costs and materials are too expensive and difficult to acquire. The argument between the two scholars is necessary since it gives a good basis on what method and strategy to choose in building the congress house. The use of pantheon or Parthenon depends on the physical features and the cost of constructing the building and the time of its stay. The pantheon style is one of the most preserved of all building styles of ancient Rome. The interior of the building built using this kind of style presents a breath-taking view of huge volume and is based on the pure geometry of a hemisphere resting on top of a cylinder of the same diameter. The Parthenon style was developed while constructing a temple of the Doric order with eight columns at the facade, and seventeen columns of the flanks, thus conforming to a ratio of 9:4 of construction. The ratio is used to govern the vertical and horizontal proportions of the building, as well as many other relationships of the building such as spacing between the columns and their heights. The method that I will use does not really matter if the construction materials requirements are not met. A congress building requires a bigger plan and a huge space within it, like the structure of Parthenon was unusually large to accommodate the oversized statues. The hemispherical dome of the pantheon structure represents the universe according to the Romans. The structure has the same length and height of diameter of the interior space measuring about 142 feet 5 inches. A pantheon structure has only one source of light which is a build circular opening that is 30 feet in diameter at the top of the room and it was referred by the Romans as the oculus, from Latin that meant eye. The attention of the congress men should not be diverted by the stroke of a single light coming into the room from tiny ventilation at the top of the house. The pantheon style is just used to ultimately express the extraordinary ability of the Roman engineers and architects the use of domes was an innovation of the buildings uniqueness and they were used in secular context. There is a unique masterpiece consideration of Doric metopic that are the combination used to decorate the walls of Parthenon building structure. These designs include the figure of God, animals, and more than 360 humans. As the architecture I can use this design to draw the heroes of the country on the wall since it is large and can accommodate a bigger number of the fallen heroes. To construct this building I require a sacred or a highly levelled ground to build since the structure has got a big meaning to the Greek people therefore a mare decision made on where to put the building will be like an insult to them. I have made a comparison between the Parthenon structures to one that is built using pantheon I realized that the structures are quite different in that the ventilation system is different. The viewers’ who have not entered the Parthenon building can only see its goodness and beauties from the outside or by using the available ventilation unlike the pantheon the outside is the beauty of the structure since it lacks many ventilation system. The Parthenon is being built in such a way that the aesthetic elements allow the smooth transition between the exterior and the interior of the house. The Parthenon building was built to serve the function of sheltering the monumental statue of the Athena that was made out of pure gold and ivory. The cost of building the temple in of such a structure costs an estimate of 438 pieces of silver which if during the 17th century butt can costs but it’s current value is more than the former estimates. Question three Counter- reformation took place during the 16th and 17th centuries, and this was the Roman Catholic fight against the Protestants reformation and effort of internal reform and renewal. The call to draw the sculpture to inspire the congregation is one of the best ways of making the people understand what is going on. The desire that resulted in many new religious orders that promoted reform within the church was due to the calls that were made for internal reform of the Roman Catholic before the Protestants reformation began. This reform has made me as the current pope to call in two artists that can present a good work of art that can inspire my congregation. The decree of this reform has made me call for decoration in religious images that induces lust to be forbidden. The most important thing about the religious images is that they should maintain a high level of clarity, and the composition should contain nothing of confusing nature. The purpose of religion is to inspire devotion and anything that might take away from devotion is to be omitted from the sculptures that are produced or should be corrected. The artists should be able to produce a non-subjective sculpture or painting so that it can serve it purpose of inspiring the congregation. The sculptures produced should not be offensive but should be clear and follow the outlined objectives. I therefore require that any superstition in the sculptures to be be removed, all the filthy lucre to be abolished, and all the lasciviousness be avoided. The figures should be painted in a way that they can be adopted by people and also great care and diligence will be considered to be used by the bishops, as that there is nothing is disorderly or is unbecoming and or confusedly arranged or nothing that is decorous but unholy be presented in the house of God. The sculpture that will be considered is one that has faithfully observed, the Holy Synod and it has been approved by the bishop. According to me Berinini is one of the best and long-time artists who are very good at the art of work field. He has been praised for his synthesis of sculpture painting and architecture. But every artist have got his own condition, he demand that I should adjust the church windows should be so that it can spread light upon the drawn sculpture. He believes that with the light the sculpture drawn will look like Holy Spirit. The artists decided to produce a sculpture if an angel that was quite short but beautiful and very presentable. The sculpture that he produce is related to Teresa’s version. He has displayed all the passion and rapture of Teresa story to represent immortalized image of swoon. The sculpture shows that Teresa is covered in monastic habit but the garments drawing in the sculpture does not have to conceal Teresa’s internal state. Caravaggio created his painting of the entombment of Christ for various churches therefore it was necessary to consider his services for this kind of activity. His paintings are always original in that they have formed the treasure of various Vatican churches. I had the same conditions for him too regarding the kind of paint expected from him. The counter formation painting that he has produced has a diagonal cascade and cadaver’s bearers that descended to the limp, dead Christ and the brave stone where He was buried. The painting looks very real with white colour and very distinct from the one that has been produced by Berinini. According to his explanation he believes that this time of counter reforming is not a time of rejoicing but rather it is a time of mourning. In his painting he has drawn the blood that dropped from Jesus skin during his suffering believing that it will inspire these people. According to his paint he stress on the fact that it is also important to know where the arms are pointing since they also contain or portrays a different meaning from what is expected from them. Has the pope I feel so touched with the work of Caravaggio and therefore I have considered his painting to be the inspirational painting to be made and be made. Question four There were some period that when one wanted to develop a market or venture in art of work gallery he had to endure a lot of factors to make it through. The situations were even harder when you came from a new country and decided to venture in another. Setting up a gallery store is not that simple therefore it requires a lot of consultation and preparation. Coming from Italy to set up a gallery store in Dutch is complicated just like investing in Foreign Company. There have been rough estimates of between five and ten million art works that have been discovered during this century in Dutch. The works of art range from prints and copies to originals hanging in very many homes. Sources states that Dutch has emerged as a vital new political, economic and cultural force. There is a change in the balance of power during this period which has reduced the market of the art of work compared to the Italians’ market which has been doing well. Capitalistic society of Dutch has cited in relation to sudden explosion of the artistic production. During this century there have been a very good flow of funds even though the market is low. After a period of time behind the political wars more pictures have been bought and the market have shot up compared to that of the Italy in terms of work of arts sales. Many of the Dutch people wanted painting if more than the Italians in the case of the market comparison for the two. The reason as to their passion is related to the population’s quintessential affection for their land and homes after the fight. After consumption of the fundamental needs the Dutch preferred to spend their surplus on buying painting and or pictures. In this century Dutch has been recognized to be a distinctively urban form of visual expression. The market changes in Italy has also been influenced by the counter-reform that is being fought by the Roman catholic, during which many Christians bought pictures and paintings that were made to inspire them during those kind of times. The artists have relocated in some of the areas with low rate of development. In late days of the century wars in Dutch the rate of urban development has grown faster and many artists have relocated to those areas with high development rates hence the market is boost, and that has reflected the experiences and aspiration of middle class urban elites. Women artist in Netherlands are highly esteemed during these period since men were out for war of politics that is raging these times. At the same time women are self-driven and they believed that they could produce good painting than men due to lack of concentration of men. This is surprising since in Italy there have not been any woman who is an artist in the work of art. They are believed to be the weak subject in the society. Italians are based on the perception that women cannot be artist since they cannot produce a quality work that is relevant to what is expected from men. Considering the painting, sculpture, pictures, and also curving, there markets are very impressive in Netherlands than in Italy. The taste for pictures and sculptures is so high in Netherlands and has a great selling price than in Italy. After the craving war in Netherlands many artists found an opportunity to produce what happened those times as piece of art. They produced the cravings of the sad moment and also the pictures of the fallen heroes during the war. These were bought by the Dutch people to remember there fighters and the tragic that beseeched them during those time. Read More