One of the aspects of current drug policy that continues to provide tension and a level of debate is why certain drugs, such as alcohol are allowed to be produced and consumed within the purview of government regulation…
Download file to see previous pages...
Within such an understanding, the following analysis will seek to compare and contrast the objective and subjective effects of the way in which existing drug policy, inclusive of alcohol allowance and taxation, creates a unique and somewhat unreasonable dynamic. Although it is not the place of this brief analysis to advocate a safe entirely new approach to drug policy within the United States, it is the hope of this research that a greater level of inference with regards to the appropriate response framework that government represents will be able to be inferred. Firstly, it must be understood that current drug policy within the United States is very much akin to Prohibition that existed following WWI. Within such an understanding, the similarities between the way in which the government, prompted by temperance movement activists throughout the nation, outlawed the production and/or consumption of alcoholic beverages within the United States is eerily similar to the way in which the ATF, FBI, and a litany of other federal and local law enforcement entities have worked in tandem since the declared War on Drugs to rid the United States of illegal substances. Anyone with even a cursory introduction to economics can realize that such a practice is ultimately futile. This is of course due to the fact that the more that a government outlaws the production, sale, distribution, and consumption of a specific good or service, then as long as that good or service is demanded, then the price thereof will increase dramatically. This jump in price is the direct result of government pressures and creates a litany of different interests that seek to capitalize on such a lucrative market. As can clearly be noted, Prohibition was soon repealed due to the fact that public outcry against it had reached a tipping point and the inability of the authorities to continue to strain the legal system with such low-level violations had reached a maximum. Yet, from an alternate standpoint, there are those individuals that reference the fact that Prohibition was ultimately effective due to the fact that it drastically reduced the amount of alcohol produced and consumed within the United States during this particular period of time; driving many would-be alcoholics into a level of forced sobriety and benefitting society by extension. In seeking to address which of these view is the more effective, it is the view of this particular author that the government was fighting a losing battle from the very beginning. Due to the fact that controlling aspects of personality and character and what an individual decides to put in their body is a personal choice, the rate of success that the government might have expected at the outset of Prohibition was limited to say the least. From a civil liberties perspective, the current government is engaging in a situation very similar to Prohibition with regards to the ongoing and exorbitantly expensive War on Drugs. Generation after generation of young disenfranchised citizens are being put behind bars for minor drug offenses; a process that ultimately hardens these young men and women and creates a much greater lasting problem for
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
The global war on drugs is an issue that has taken the entire continent by storm. The developed countries are having a rough time as their economies are slowly brought to their knees because of this trade.
It analyzes how many professionals believe that incarcerating drug offenders actually reduces crime, but what they do not know is the fact that according to the time series analysis of four crime rates in the United States, this view is not supported.
The war on drugs has implied harsh punishment on persons found either using or selling drugs, ignoring the level at which it is practiced, as is the case with high-school children looking to earn some extra money to support their families. Furthermore, persons incarcerated for minor drug trafficking find it difficult to get employment having being convicted. This leads them to refining the skills they already have in drug trade (Becker and Murphy, 2013). Established in the 1970s by President Nixon, the war on drugs has resulted in devoting of substantial government resources to law enforcement and criminal justice processes.
Efficiently confronting the drug problem involves both preventing the issue from arising through drug eradication and military involvement, as well as by providing remedial solution to the problem through different methods of treatment. A study on drug trade shows the role played by colonization in the growth of international opium and cocaine trades and the essay analyzes this. Furthermore, an analysis of the ways in which conflict and wars play an important role in establishing a drug market have also been discussed.
asures taken in terms of prohibition, there were not required results by the war on drugs, the authors like Buckley, Nadelmann, Schmoke, McNamara, Sweet, Szasz and Duke come up with new thinking on the issue. According to the mentioned authors, the war on drugs has failed. In
This war against drugs has not been very effective since the time it was started. It has gone through many challenges that make it difficult in solving the problem of drugs. This shows how difficult it is to control the use of drugs in most of the
Prohibition of the drugs is a major source of crime because it inflates the prices and invites new criminals into the illegal trade and fosters adulteration. Moreover, prohibition ties up law enforcement officers, who would be available to pursue other serious crimes, to drug related cases.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Prohibition, War on Drugs for FREE!