The Roe versus Wade Case Introduction This present study focuses on the Roe versus Wade case, which was decided in 1973. The discussion presented in this essay will seek to provide valid facts refuting the judgment that was issued in this case. The Roe versus Wade case The Roe versus Wade case is a landmark case that was decided upon in 1973 by the United States’ Supreme Court and the judgment issued in this case has still been a topic of discussion 40 years after the controversial judgment was issued…
Download file to see previous pages...
The judges vote on the ruling was 7 to 2 with majority choosing to have abortion legalized basing it on the right to privacy, which is spelt under the clause of due process in the 14th amendment. In the written ruling by Justice Harry Blackmun, he justified the legalization of abortion because of the fact that illegalization infringed upon women’s right to privacy and the ruling subsequently, overruled all other state antiabortion statutes. According to Alcorn, the ruling issued in this case permitted the state to intervene during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy when there is an urgent need to protect the pregnant woman and/ or even the unborn child (28-31). However, it is important to note that the trimester consideration was struck out leaving the main fact about the ruling as that a pregnant woman had the right to abort until ‘viability.’ Murti stated that despite the numerous cases being filed to repeal this judgment, a ruling made 1992 in the case of Planned Parenthood versus Casey reaffirmed the right to abortion that had been granted under the Roe versus Wade case, but it permitted further restrictions (33-36). ...
The pro-life group refers to those who are against the ruling while the pro-choice refers to those who support the ruling citing the fact that a woman has the right to decide whether she would want to keep the pregnancy or not (45-56). Without including matters of the law or legal principles into the discussion, Murti stated that the greatest opposition to the ruling made by in the Roe versus Wade case has been based around religious and moral ideologies or views (88-89). The pro-life advocates have continually stated that the ruling given in the Roe versus Wade case goes against religious teachings in all the faiths where abortion has been openly condemned and classified as a sin against the Lord. With reference to religious teachings, Alcorn stated that the Bible has openly refuted the act of abortion since the Lord referred to children as a blessing and therefore, it would go against the Lord’s wishes if a pregnant woman terminates a pregnancy thereby failing to give the unborn child the right to life (67-73). For example, Amos chapter 1 verse 13 states, “the help of the Lord is essential, for He has dominion over human life and its origin. Parents cooperate with God in bringing forth life. Because this whole process is under God’s dominion and therefore, it is sinful to interrupt it.” This versus was written with reference to the violent acts that were taking place in Gilead where attackers were ripping open expectant mothers, thus killing their unborn children. This verse by Amos clearly indicates that pregnancy is under the dominion of God and therefore, it is a sin before the Lord. Additionally, Biblical teachings repeatedly in several versus condemn the killing of the innocent while other versus refer to the
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Supreme Court case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/history/1488719-supreme-court-case
(Supreme Court Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Supreme Court Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/history/1488719-supreme-court-case.
The ruling of the high court in respect of this case brought a major change, leading to the legalization of abortion.Today, abortion is considered to be the right of the woman in respect of the fourteenth Amendment of the US constitution. The following sections of the paper are dedicated to discussing the Roe v. Wade case.
The Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, in the so-called “Takings Clause,” allows the government to mandate the sale of property for purposes of eminent domain provider the owner is justly compensated (Kelo). This was specifically added to the Bill of Rights in order to prevent the sovereign (government) from arbitrarily seizing property for illegitimate or corrupt purposes.
This applies to the arena of marriage as in most cases, it is under some type of religious authority that marriages take place. Additionally, the government should not be able to dictate who may or may not
Court made an important decision that stated it was legal to have separate facilities for African American and White American patrons, including bathrooms, entrances, and even theatres, so long as those facilities were equal. States used the decision to create segregated public
ulfilled its responsibility to interpret the meaning and intention of the involved law and the consenting judges in no way resorted to judicial activism.
One has to be a non-activist to divest the charges of activism oft levied on the consenting judges in this particular case.
After the start of the war there was an increased demand that Japanese individuals residing in America including those who have migrated and even those who were born in the nation were to be looked upon as saboteurs and needed to be evacuated from the Western Coastal regions
Any person accused of any crime is entitled to a fair trial to avoid administration of unjust punishment (Siegel 185). The court should conduct the trial in public “free of prejudice, passion, excitement, and tyrannical power.” In the case of Sheppard v Maxwell
In the Commissioner v. Tufts, 463 U.S. 1215 (1983), the Supreme Court arrived at the decision that when a taxpayer disposes the property encumbered by a nonrecourse indebtedness that exceeds that which is deemed to
to handover her purse to the principal. While searching her purse the vice principal found an array of unreasonable things in her purse like cigarettes, rolling papers commonly used to smoke marijuana, small amounts of drugs, ample cash and incriminating documentary
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Supreme Court case for FREE!